• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The Scheduling Of The November Sweeps Should Be Changed

J

Joseph_Gallant

Guest
I am going to go up on my soapbox and rant that the scheduling of the November "sweeps" by Nielsen be changed.

What I'd like to see if the sweeps rescheduled so that they always end the night before Thanksgiving (since sweeps always start on a Thursday and end on 28 nights later, which is always a Wednesday. That's why the final night of the prime-time TV season is always the Wednesday night before Memorial Day in late May).

Why do I advocate such a change??

(1) On Thanksgiving weekend, many millions of people travel "back home". In some markets, I think that one-third of the people normally residing in the market may not be in that market. Today, three generations of a family are likely to live in as many different parts of the country. With many people not in their "home market" for the weekend, viewing patterns get disrupted.

(2) And even if people are home for Thanksgiving, thanks to family activities, TV viewing is "out of whack". For instance, it's my understanding that on a typical Sunday afternoon during the NFL regular-season, more people nationally watch a CBS or Fox 4:15 P.M. (ET) game than a 1:05 game. But on Turkey Day, thanks to Thanksgiving dinners, it's reverse: The 12:35 (EST) game gets more viewers than the 4:15 game, because many are sittting down to dinner during the time the 4:15 game is being played. The exceptions are probably Dallas and whatever is the home city of the Cowboys' Thanksgiving Day opponent.

(3) I suspect some "prime" (read: weeknights at 6 and 11 P.M. ET/5 or 6 and 10 P.M. CT/MT on ABC/CBS/NBC stations and weeknights 10 P.M. ET/PT, 9 P.M. CT/MT on Fox, UPN and WB affiliates) local news, weather and sports anchors probably have it written into their contracts that they get holidays off. But if Thanksgiving occurs during the sweeps, "prime" news/weather/sports anchors might not be able to get Thanksgiving or the day after off, even if it's written into their contracts (and any anchor should be able to negotiate a contract that gives them all holidays off). I believe that unless there is a major news story that day which warrants their being there, "prime" anchors should get Thanksgiving and the next day off.

(4) While a couple of networks broadcast college football games on the day after Thanksgiving, I am curious if viewing levels during both daytime and prime-time hours are lower than usual due to the fact that it's also the traditional start of the Christmas-shopping season (although in my case, I've already done a lot of my shopping for this year).

(5) I would also think that prime-time viewing levels on the Sunday after Thanksgiving may be lower than a typical late Fall Sunday night due to the fact that many people are enroute home after Thanksgiving weekend.

I personally believe that changing the schedule of the November "sweeps" so they always end the night before Thanksgiving would be helpful to the industry because:

(1) Thanksgiving weekend, with it's disrupted viewing patterns, is removed from the sweeps.

(2) "Prime" local news anchors would be on the air all 20 weeknights of the November "sweeps".

(3) Networks would not have to broadcast a lot of first-run prime-time programming (except for brand-new seasonal specials) during Thanksgiving weekend.

What do you think??
 
> I am going to go up on my soapbox and rant that the
> scheduling of the November "sweeps" by Nielsen be changed.
>
> What I'd like to see if the sweeps rescheduled so that they
> always end the night before Thanksgiving (since sweeps
> always start on a Thursday and end on 28 nights later, which
> is always a Wednesday. That's why the final night of the
> prime-time TV season is always the Wednesday night before
> Memorial Day in late May).
>
> Why do I advocate such a change??
>
> (1) On Thanksgiving weekend, many millions of people travel
> "back home". In some markets, I think that one-third of the
> people normally residing in the market may not be in that
> market. Today, three generations of a family are likely to
> live in as many different parts of the country. With many
> people not in their "home market" for the weekend, viewing
> patterns get disrupted.
>
> (2) And even if people are home for Thanksgiving, thanks to
> family activities, TV viewing is "out of whack". For
> instance, it's my understanding that on a typical Sunday
> afternoon during the NFL regular-season, more people
> nationally watch a CBS or Fox 4:15 P.M. (ET) game than a
> 1:05 game. But on Turkey Day, thanks to Thanksgiving
> dinners, it's reverse: The 12:35 (EST) game gets more
> viewers than the 4:15 game, because many are sittting down
> to dinner during the time the 4:15 game is being played. The
> exceptions are probably Dallas and whatever is the home city
> of the Cowboys' Thanksgiving Day opponent.
>
> (3) I suspect some "prime" (read: weeknights at 6 and 11
> P.M. ET/5 or 6 and 10 P.M. CT/MT on ABC/CBS/NBC stations and
> weeknights 10 P.M. ET/PT, 9 P.M. CT/MT on Fox, UPN and WB
> affiliates) local news, weather and sports anchors probably
> have it written into their contracts that they get holidays
> off. But if Thanksgiving occurs during the sweeps, "prime"
> news/weather/sports anchors might not be able to get
> Thanksgiving or the day after off, even if it's written into
> their contracts (and any anchor should be able to negotiate
> a contract that gives them all holidays off). I believe that
> unless there is a major news story that day which warrants
> their being there, "prime" anchors should get Thanksgiving
> and the next day off.
>
> (4) While a couple of networks broadcast college football
> games on the day after Thanksgiving, I am curious if viewing
> levels during both daytime and prime-time hours are lower
> than usual due to the fact that it's also the traditional
> start of the Christmas-shopping season (although in my case,
> I've already done a lot of my shopping for this year).
>
> (5) I would also think that prime-time viewing levels on the
> Sunday after Thanksgiving may be lower than a typical late
> Fall Sunday night due to the fact that many people are
> enroute home after Thanksgiving weekend.
>
> I personally believe that changing the schedule of the
> November "sweeps" so they always end the night before
> Thanksgiving would be helpful to the industry because:
>
> (1) Thanksgiving weekend, with it's disrupted viewing
> patterns, is removed from the sweeps.
>
> (2) "Prime" local news anchors would be on the air all 20
> weeknights of the November "sweeps".
>
> (3) Networks would not have to broadcast a lot of first-run
> prime-time programming (except for brand-new seasonal
> specials) during Thanksgiving weekend.
>
> What do you think??

Good points, I agree with you. I'd like to see the NFL schedule a prime time game each Thanksgiving on NBC to get them in the mix, although the Egg Bowl (Ole Miss/Mississippi State) is usually aired during that time on ESPN.
>
 
The networks recognize it's a holiday, so they schedule (usually) repeats during the holiday -- if not that whole week.
 
XL commented:

> The networks recognize it's a holiday, so they schedule
> (usually) repeats during the holiday -- if not that whole
> week.

Last year, the November "sweeps" extended through Thanksgiving weekend, and I recall that the broadcast networks aired first-run episodes of most of their prime-time series throughout the four-day weekend.

Sometimes, the November "sweeps" do end the night before Thanksgiving, and in that case, prime-time schedules for the four day Holiday weekend are usually reruns except for brand-new seasonal specials.
 
If it was up to me, all "Sweeps" would be gone and we the tv audience won't have to endure the crap that the networks pull during "Sweeps", like preempting regular scheduled shows for some stupid special or whatever the suits think up. That really angers me when they preempt my favorite shows, whether it be a rerun or not, for some silly old awards show. I don't care for awards shows, except for MTV's and even then I don't watch it if boy groups or whomever I don't like are on it.
 
Silent Greg suggests:

> If it was up to me, all "Sweeps" would be gone....

If Nielsen could somehow get continuous local ratings in every single TV market every single day of the year (at present, Nielsen does take ratings every day of the year in major markets), the "sweeps" as such can be eliminated. You would then have, in effect, a 365-days-a-year "sweep".

But specials that pre-empt regular proghramming would not vanish if the sweeps disappear. They would be more spread-out throughout the year instead of being concentrated in three periods of four weeks each in November, February, and May.
 
> Silent Greg suggests:
>
> > If it was up to me, all "Sweeps" would be gone....
>
> If Nielsen could somehow get continuous local ratings in
> every single TV market every single day of the year (at
> present, Nielsen does take ratings every day of the year in
> major markets), the "sweeps" as such can be eliminated. You
> would then have, in effect, a 365-days-a-year "sweep".
>
> But specials that pre-empt regular proghramming would not
> vanish if the sweeps disappear. They would be more
> spread-out throughout the year instead of being concentrated
> in three periods of four weeks each in November, February,
> and May.
>


So no matter what we do, sweeps will always be around in some form or another. That sucks. Well then, I won't watch tv when they pre-empt my shows in Nov., Feb., and May. I wish those stupid award shows would go away, but I imagine someone out there loves them for some reason. And even if they did, whatever that replaces them is probably going to be a lot worse than they can ever be.
 
> I am going to go up on my soapbox and rant that the
> scheduling of the November "sweeps" by Nielsen be changed.

Here is what I would do, I would not tell the networks when the sweeps periods would be. This would allow for a more accurate sample of viewership of normal programming. Then again, polls of any kind are never accurate or scientific.<P ID="signature">______________
WCBS = We're Crazy Buffoons and Schmucks
<a href=http://chuck.spotteddogs.org/tv/>Spotted Dog TV Talk - for all your non-news TV Talk</a></P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom