johndavis said:10:25AM: KTRH is talking Republican presidential debates. KROI is wall to wall severe weather & flooding coverage.
For breaking news, Houston doesn't depend on KTRH anymore.
johndavis said:10:25AM: KTRH is talking Republican presidential debates. KROI is wall to wall severe weather & flooding coverage.
For breaking news, Houston doesn't depend on KTRH anymore.
johndavis said:10:25AM: KTRH is talking Republican presidential debates. KROI is wall to wall severe weather & flooding coverage.
For breaking news, Houston doesn't depend on KTRH anymore.
poops said:I guess Rush is more important than keeping the local listeners informed during a major weather event
radiogooroo said:[EDIT]
I work in the market in a management level position, but not for Clear Channel or Radio One. I just call them like I see them.
From my perspective, when it comes to News 92 threads here, there's one of two types of posters cheering News 92 - washed up has-beens who were clearly flushed out of KTRH at some point, or people who simply hate right-wing talk radio. It's really less about praising News 92 and more about bashing KTRH. The new station simply gives these people a vehicle for their vengeance.
I gave the coverage on News 92 a shot yesterday, and what I heard was awful. I heard calls from listeners that were either poorly screened, or a radio station airing calls that weren't really qualified because they were desperate to fill the airtime with something. I heard a host letting morons ramble on and on with their opinions of the weather. Is that news? I'll admit that I didn't listen long. I suffered through a few minutes of that before punching out and tuning in to one of my music stations, which was doing a much better job with the callers it was airing.
The difference was the hosts on the music station were interviewing the listeners and asking specific questions about what they had seen. They kept the calls short unless the caller was especially witty or entertaining. If this is what News 92 thinks news is, they should probably listen to some of the personality driven morning shows on the music stations and take notes on handling callers.
Drucifer said:And your bias for KTRH is so obvious, Stevie Wonder could see it. Thanks for the preaching though. Regardless of which category you want to put me in, A.) KTRH-Hater, B.) KTRH-Has been, C.) Right-wing talk hater, or whatever, the fact remains that News 92 is DOING news much better than Cheap Channel's heritage AM.
radiogooroo said:Drucifer said:And your bias for KTRH is so obvious, Stevie Wonder could see it. Thanks for the preaching though. Regardless of which category you want to put me in, A.) KTRH-Hater, B.) KTRH-Has been, C.) Right-wing talk hater, or whatever, the fact remains that News 92 is DOING news much better than Cheap Channel's heritage AM.
I have no bias for KTRH. I do enjoy talk radio. I enjoy right-wing talk, home improvement shows, car shows and that gun talk show that airs weekends on 950. KTRH is the vehicle for most of that type of programming here in Houston. I also enjoy listening to Clark Howard on 650, and get to quite a bit during baseball season. (I wish the Astros could find their way onto a sports station and not screw up the talk radio I enjoy for so much of the year.)
Being a fan of talk radio, I simply see no point wasting time airing call after call from listeners who are talking about something as obvious as rain and flooding.
When it comes to news, I want to hear it - in small, well packaged pieces. KTRH screws that up fairly regularly with their pre-recorded, outside the market talent, but I'll tolerate it to hear the talk radio that I enjoy. Do I wish KTRH would do a better job with the news they carry? Yes, I do. I wish they would utilize local talent exclusively, and pay some experienced local talent what they're worth to do it right. I think most of their talk radio audience would appreciate that.
I don't however see any benefit to the talk radio listener to bump Rush Limbaugh off the air to carry rain reports from Billy Joe and Bubba.
Well gooroo... I guess you've schooled this "nimrod" in what real radio is supposed to be in your world... but in mine, a couple friends and family members were trying to navigate thru Houston during the rains, and they tuned in to KROI at my urging, and it seems that News 92FM was of some help. So... if what KTRH is doing is News.... I'd much rather listen to static (or someone running their fingernails down a blackboard).radiogooroo said:poops said:I guess Rush is more important than keeping the local listeners informed during a major weather event
Well, yeah, he is. Any nimrod could look outside their window and see it was raining - hard. Not surprisingly, the low lying areas that always flood got flooded too. Shocking! If that's "news" it's awfully boring, and it certainly wasn't "news" to me. I don't need to tune into a station and hear a bunch of wannabe reporters on their cell phones telling me it's raining hard in their neighborhood.
I'd liken KTRH cutting off Rush for coverage of the rain to TV meteorologists breaking in on top of primetime programming for the same type of stuff.
KTRH obviously presented coverage of all the weather info that was actually news as they're the EAS LP1 for Houston. If an official watch or warning went out from an official source, like the National Weather Service, they carried it. What they didn't carry was hours of Billy Joe and Bubba calling in to report that there was water falling from the sky in their neighborhood.
stan said:Good questions. I don't recall seeing any tv ads for news 92 while in Houston last week, but they would be in order. Perhaps footage of cars stuck in high water, with the voice over 'avoid this next time by listening to news 92 fm'.