quote author=rbrucecarter5 link=topic=113989.msg959114#msg959114 date=1232741458]
If we ran Christian radio like a business, we would insist on some cold, hard numbers to support that assertion. We have the best "product" in the world - salvation by grace through Jesus Christ. Yet we don't have the foggiest notion of how to "sell" that product to the world, even though the price is monetarily free.
I suspect the numbers of salvations, like the ratings numbers of the translators, are very very low. This is a waste of the radio spectrum. Something that the government is too scared to confront us about, but I guarantee the Lord will. Most Christian stations - useless in terms of new converts. The fault - the old fogies who run them.
[/quote]
One of the good things about the time and energy we spend in discussion groups is that what we say is sometimes handed back to us by someone who says: "Try out some of your own dog food here. See if it really does go down well."
It happens to me often. And I learn from it. So. Let me hand you back a bowl or two of your own dog food, and let's both learn something from it. ;D
If we ran Christian radio....... I would contend that the national, long-time Christian broadcasters do excellent research and that is why they remain in operation. Local stations probably DO NOT use the kind of logic that a good business would. But I have a question about this. Jesus in parables and teachings sometimes used examples of how humanity and civilization work (How business works?) to make a point, but aren't many of his teachings, his examples, contrary to the ways of the world....CONTRARY TO GOOD BUSINESS?
We don't know how to sell the product? When I look around at the mega-church and multi-point church phenomenal growth, I have to conclude we may know too much about how to SELL the product. Is the Gospel about SELLING the product, or is it about sharing the product? Church in America is SELLING something today.... but I am not sure we are SHAREING THE "PRODUCT".... whatever that means.
The government is too scared to confront the church about the poor use of radio? Are you ready for the government to decide what is effective results of Christian radio? If that works.... should we ask the government to also decide what is effective results of Christian church buildings? If a church is using too much electricity, gas heat, etc for the results it is getting, shouldn't the government shut it down? Are we then going to invite the government to examine the productivity of our ministers so we can know which ones to remove from service? Try this on for size: If the Muslims choose to have radio broadcasts, would you want to government to also rate their effectiveness? One set of rules for all, or one set for Christians, one set for Muslims, one set for.... (on and on and on)?
And finally... back to "cold, hard numbers to support our assertions: Can you document that old fogies are indeed responsible for the poor performance of Christian radio? And can you document that Christian radio is useless in delivering converts. And can you document that delivering converts is the best use of Christian radio?
I got a lot more picky and put a lot more what-ifs into this post than I started out to do. This is NOT a "I'm right and your wrong" message. It is intended as an invitation for every reader to ask: What should we expect from Chritian radio? How will we measure the results. How will we set our expectations for five and ten years from now?