Postponed, not preempted. This is really not the right thread for this.
It’s not remotely odd nor unfair.
I agree. The "how close to live sports" thread seems to have things like thatPostponed, not preempted. This is really not the right thread for this.
I agree. The "how close to live sports" thread seems to have things like that
They better start soon, currently up 20-3.Correct, and as of now, that game is still scheduled to be played. Although CLE is missing 4 wide receivers.
And I expect the Jets will still lose.
They better start soon, currently up 20-3.
The players don't care. The coach is gone so he doesn't care. The fans and ownership are the ones that care.That's going to kill chances of getting a good draft pick.
And they're going to get a good draft pick no matter what, mostly likely No. 2.The players don't care. The coach is gone so he doesn't care. The fans and ownership are the ones that care.
Jags are losing, Jets will get no worse than 3rd pick.And they're going to get a good draft pick no matter what, mostly likely No. 2.
How is it not unfair that they scheduled a new episode of a show that features LA locals in a slot where it had a >50% chance of getting JIP'd over a show that's airing non-continuous reruns from ~13 years ago specifically because they expect pre-emptions on this day, especially when they normally don't air in that order?It’s not remotely odd nor unfair.
Because in a market the size of Los Angeles -- or any rated TV market, really -- whether the friends and family of the contestants get to see the complete show doesn't mean diddly in terms of ratings success or advertising revenue. There is NO conspiracy against WOF, and never has been. You are living in a fantasy world. Too bad for the folks who know the contestants, but as they say: Suck it up, Buttercup. Life goes on.How is it not unfair that they scheduled a new episode of a show that features LA locals in a slot where it had a >50% chance of getting JIP'd over a show that's airing non-continuous reruns from ~13 years ago specifically because they expect pre-emptions on this day, especially when they normally don't air in that order?
Because it’s a business. Always has been. Whatever strange personal obsessions one may harbor has no impact on making a business decision. And if one sets aside said obsessions, they might understand exactly why these Jeopardy episodes are important, rerun or not.How is it not unfair that they scheduled a new episode of a show that features LA locals in a slot where it had a >50% chance of getting JIP'd over a show that's airing non-continuous reruns from ~13 years ago specifically because they expect pre-emptions on this day, especially when they normally don't air in that order?
Thank You I have said this in the past when I said local TV stations are expanding newscast for breaking news reasons and then get hit with the Wheel of Fortune pre-emption rants. It's just that Syndication TV is going to have to be reconsidered going forward. We know with Primetime shows they can easily go to various on demand apps. In the case of Sony going forward they will have to make their syndicated game shows streaming only if local TV stations have to keep extending newscasts to remain relevant.Because in a market the size of Los Angeles -- or any rated TV market, really -- whether the friends and family of the contestants get to see the complete show doesn't mean diddly in terms of ratings success or advertising revenue. There is NO conspiracy against WOF, and never has been. You are living in a fantasy world. Too bad for the folks who know the contestants, but as they say: Suck it up, Buttercup. Life goes on.