Good news for the folks who were set to be laid off: http://www.austin360.com/music/content/music/stories/2007/02/24beat.html
intx said:Good news for the folks who were set to be laid off: http://www.austin360.com/music/content/music/stories/2007/02/24beat.html
dallasboyz said:In all reality, it isnt much of a signal. You can bet that station (less than 3 thousand watts) hired the old Beat staff back for about half of what they were already making. It wont make much difference in the long run. They will be just strong enough to take about 2 shares away from Hot 93.
Posted by: MINDonDAradio247-I give the New 104.9 The Beat a year at the most.
JimmyATX said:dallasboyz said:In all reality, it isnt much of a signal. You can bet that station (less than 3 thousand watts) hired the old Beat staff back for about half of what they were already making. It wont make much difference in the long run. They will be just strong enough to take about 2 shares away from Hot 93.
If i'm not mistaken, I believe there is an application to move 104.9's tower several miles closer to Austin (currently just East of Dripping springs), to just west of the "Y" in Oak Hill (about 10-12 miles W of downtown Austin). It will have more of a directional signal pattern, but it can't hurt. I dont know about the timing of this move, and it could be too late by then.
radioeye said:JimmyATX said:dallasboyz said:In all reality, it isnt much of a signal. You can bet that station (less than 3 thousand watts) hired the old Beat staff back for about half of what they were already making. It wont make much difference in the long run. They will be just strong enough to take about 2 shares away from Hot 93.
If i'm not mistaken, I believe there is an application to move 104.9's tower several miles closer to Austin (currently just East of Dripping springs), to just west of the "Y" in Oak Hill (about 10-12 miles W of downtown Austin). It will have more of a directional signal pattern, but it can't hurt. I dont know about the timing of this move, and it could be too late by then.
The move is so directionalized that it is a flat top to the north and equally severe to the east. Both directions that they MUST cover to hold on to loyal listeners of The Beat. Hot should win this one, hands down.
Judge it for yourself.... old pattern http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/FMTV-service-area?x=FM1048711.html
new pattern http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/FMTV-service-area?x=FM1167857.html
You don't cut back a signal in the area that you want to cover. If they want to "optimize" an antenna, you can't do it. The directional pattern must be field tested to "prove" that directional pattern is correct. That leaves no room for "improvement". It really seems like a very bad move.