Kyle D said:
I'm not saying that sports should only be on sports stations. What I'm saying is, if a company owns play by play rights and it owns a sports station, and the sports station isn't already airing other play by play, it makes the most sense for the play by play to be on the sports station.
It makes sense to YOU. Radio isn't about you. It's about money. CBS has made a business decision to put the games on 1210. I'm not a big Ike Reese fan (yet), but on WIP it doesn't matter. The timeslot makes money. 1210 makes a MINT off of the Phillies, way more then they can make off of the regular programming.
It's not about me. It's about making money. I never said anything else. Having consistent brands and formats is part of making money. So is not having two stations canabalizing each other over the same demos.
Of course the Phillies make lots of money for CBS. I never said CBS shouldn't air them. The question is whether CBS should air them on WIP or on WPHT. You're making a false comparison between 1210's regular programming and the Phillies. That's not the choice CBS has to make. It's going to air the Phillies - the question is where.
The choice, IOW, is to air Phillies on 1210 + Ike Reese on 610 or Phillies on 610 + Dom Giordano/Anthony Mazzarelli on 1210.
Which combination will result in more listeners (in demos that matter) for the two CBS stations combined, in that time slot? I'd bet Ike Reese canabalizes more Phillies listeners than would Giordano/Mazzarelli, so I'd think the Phillies ratings would be higher on 610 than they are on 1210. Enough to make up the difference between Ike Reese and Giordano/Mazzarelli? I have no idea what the spread is between them or even if Reese's ratings are higher. I suspect, though, that the consistent branding of a sports station and a talk station will increase ratings for both.
And that's just for night games. For day games it makes even less financial sense to pre-empt Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity (who make money for WPHT, right?) to air the Phillies, instead of pre-empting Anthony Gargano and Glen Macnow. To pre-empt both, like CBS is doing tomorrow, seems even sillier.
Kyle D said:
When you learn that radio isn't about "making sense", you'll be a whole lot better off. CBS would be complete idiots putting the Phillies on 610, thus slashing profits.
You've yet to demonstrate how Ike Reese is so much more profitable on at the same time as the Phillies than talk programming on WPHT would be.
Kyle D said:
As for your little New York anecdote, do you think 880 makes any money off of airing Yankees games? Thought so. I'm guessing Yankees baseball probably pulls in more cash for CBS than the news product, during evening hours. Just a hunch...
I sometimes wonder why I waste the keystrokes...
Where did I say WCBS shouldn't air the Yankees? Of course they make more money than news does at night (especially where CBS splits news audience over two stations).
If WFAN somehow lost the Mets rights, do you think CBS would wait more than 10 seconds before moving the Yankees to WFAN? Of course not. Why would you air sports talk against the Yankees on your own sister station, when you can attract a non-sports audience with news instead?