• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

This week in media...

In this past week, particularly within the realm of talk radio, I feel we've reached a threshold. I've been particularly impressed with the Sheehan story in Crawford while the President is on vacation. It's August and everyone is out of D.C. while the electorate enjoys there vacations and peruses the issues of the day. Alot of important political impressions have been made upon the American voter during the dog days of summer. The Watergate hearings in 1973 come to mind, Chicago in August of 1968 and then, of course, MLK on a scorching day in Washington D.C. back in 1963 provided the spark that set the agenda for civil rights at the dusk of the Kennedy era.

Could this issue with Cindy Sheehan, the mom camped out in Crawford demanding a meeting with Bush, be the flashpoint that's bound to inflame passions and further the divisions so apparent in this country. Those of us who remember the Vietnam/Civil Rights era of the 1960's (and 70's) can see the writing on the wall. As someone who oppossed going into Iraq in the first place back in 2002, I remember telling friends and family that this is what was bound to happen. That a mom, respected in her community, a youth counselor within the Catholic Church and a greiving parent of a dead soldier, was going to ignite the debate.

It's now a late Sunday summer morning and the pundits and talking heads have given there views on the T.V. How do you feel about how talk radio has addressed this issue?

In Thursdays News-Tribune the Sheehan story made the front page. All day Thursday and Friday right-wing talk radio, and the T.V. soundbite media, tried to pin Sheehan on two issues and they were whether she was a tool of the Michael Moore radical left wing and whether relatives within her family supported her position or not. Everyone across the board all over right wing talk and T.V. had the same two questions. And someone named Dana Brown got a letter to the editor printed in the Trib expressing those exact same thoughts ONE DAY after the story appeared.

Instead of questioning, reporting, investigating and being objective, the pundits simply attack. I doubt Sheehan even really cares about Michael Moore but someone, somewhere co-ordinated the talking points within the corporate media. As a broadcaster I know, and you GOP talking heads know as well, that there's planted calls, media strategy sessions and, if need be, book deals, appearance fees, and general ass kissing.

What the American public is asking this summer is whether talk radio is even viable and can be trusted or is it all some sort of game driven by dollars and ego. And has right wing media gone too far attacking the only voice you, in the media, failed to recognize until now. That voice is of a greiving mother.

The polls say your ratings could plummet.
 
Alan Prell on KIRO (who everyone here seems to think is awful) did this same topic last week.

He said that sometimes its the odd things or the odd person (Rosa Parks, that guy in Tieneman Square, John Lennon) that is the major turning point in huge historical events.

He did it for his entire show and it was some of the best readio I've ever heard in seattle.
 
I usually miss Prell since I work when he's on. For those of you who might think I'm a mouthpiece for his show well..

I work for a living.
 
> In this past week, particularly within the realm of talk
> radio, I feel we've reached a threshold. I've been
> particularly impressed with the Sheehan story in Crawford
> while the President is on vacation. It's August and everyone
> is out of D.C. while the electorate enjoys there vacations
> and peruses the issues of the day. Alot of important
> political impressions have been made upon the American voter
> during the dog days of summer. The Watergate hearings in
> 1973 come to mind, Chicago in August of 1968 and then, of
> course, MLK on a scorching day in Washington D.C. back in
> 1963 provided the spark that set the agenda for civil rights
> at the dusk of the Kennedy era.
>
> Could this issue with Cindy Sheehan, the mom camped out in
> Crawford demanding a meeting with Bush, be the flashpoint
> that's bound to inflame passions and further the divisions
> so apparent in this country. Those of us who remember the
> Vietnam/Civil Rights era of the 1960's (and 70's) can see
> the writing on the wall. As someone who oppossed going into
> Iraq in the first place back in 2002, I remember telling
> friends and family that this is what was bound to happen.
> That a mom, respected in her community, a youth counselor
> within the Catholic Church and a greiving parent of a dead
> soldier, was going to ignite the debate.
>
> It's now a late Sunday summer morning and the pundits and
> talking heads have given there views on the T.V. How do you
> feel about how talk radio has addressed this issue?
>
> In Thursdays News-Tribune the Sheehan story made the front
> page. All day Thursday and Friday right-wing talk radio, and
> the T.V. soundbite media, tried to pin Sheehan on two issues
> and they were whether she was a tool of the Michael Moore
> radical left wing and whether relatives within her family
> supported her position or not. Everyone across the board all
> over right wing talk and T.V. had the same two questions.
> And someone named Dana Brown got a letter to the editor
> printed in the Trib expressing those exact same thoughts ONE
> DAY after the story appeared.

Ain't that the cons for ya? Cold blooded insensitive bastards go and turn the heartbreak of a grieving mother into her personal inquisition. A tool for Michael Moore! HELLO?! It wasn't Michael Moore that killed her child-DIMWITS!

...and, if that wasn't enough, they try to divide her family in their darkest hour.

You know, some people can suck up to this bozo in the Oval Orifice all they want, but when they become so blind in their zeal and lust for power that they would pull crap like this, it's time to stick a fork in their asses and turn 'em over, they're done.
>
> Instead of questioning, reporting, investigating and being
> objective, the pundits simply attack. I doubt Sheehan even
> really cares about Michael Moore but someone, somewhere
> co-ordinated the talking points within the corporate media.
> As a broadcaster I know, and you GOP talking heads know as
> well, that there's planted calls, media strategy sessions
> and, if need be, book deals, appearance fees, and general
> ass kissing.
>
> What the American public is asking this summer is whether
> talk radio is even viable and can be trusted or is it all
> some sort of game driven by dollars and ego. And has right
> wing media gone too far attacking the only voice you, in the
> media, failed to recognize until now. That voice is of a
> greiving mother.
>
> The polls say your ratings could plummet.

Right said Stang Buddy!

Bush promised us accountability during his presidency. Why have we seen so little of it? How can he understand the average American if he won't get off his ass and MEET one?

If Bush has any microgram of decency in him, he must face Cindy Sheehan. And give her straight, no bulls--t, no double-speak answers to ALL of her questions because she has every right in the world to demand an explaination for her son's death. As well as every mother of a dead soldier in this unjust, uncalled for and unexcusable invasion. If he can't do that, face it America, we've got a coward for a leader.

Look at this (from CNN.com http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/08/14/peace.mom.ap/index.html ):

"Tensions flared Saturday at the protest site outside Bush's ranch, with one heated exchange between a Bush supporter and a veteran who opposes the war in Iraq. When the veteran shouted about his war experiences and yelled, "I earned the right to be here!" several of his fellow protesters pulled him away as he sobbed and his knees buckled...."

Here's a typically ignorant Bush supporter, telling a veteran who has seen more hell in one day than this creep can even IMAGINE in 20 lifetimes he is wrong for opposing the war. Talk about supporting the troops!

I know a couple retired high ranking military guys and they both tell me the same thing: Bush has no actual war experience (the Champagne Unit doesn't count), so he has NO RIGHT sending troops off to war. Only a president who has been in the line of fire, who has personally witnessed the horror of war and knows it's consequences for both sides first hand can make that call. That is why the vast majority of actual war veterans believe war should only be the VERY LAST resort and there MUST be a VALID reason. War profiteering is NOT an acceptable reason.

None of these chicken-hawks in the Bush administration has actual war experience.

All of this could the catalyst that brings down the Bush administration and the rest of the cons for good. We may be blocked from seeing flag-draped caskets coming home on the TV news, but all we need are the numbers of dead soldiers and the faces of their sobbing mothers. If they try to block the people from seeing that (which will probably be the cons next desperate move in saving their rusting, sinking ship), there is going to be an outbreak of protests and demonstrations not seen in the US since the '60s (or even in American history.)

Cons may say they hate the liberalism of the '60s, but at the rate they're going, I can't think of a faster way of bringing it back.


>
<P ID="signature">______________
Seattle Hempfest, August 20-21, Myrtle Edwards Park, http://www.hempfest.org/

[email protected]


</P>
 
One question...

Are those of you who's opinion is that Cindy Sheehan is right, proud to be inline with David Duke?

http://www.davidduke.com/index.php?p=350

I think her grief has been hijacked for political reasons.

Just my $0.02 worth.<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by gearjammer on 08/16/05 01:15 AM.</FONT></P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom