• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Thoughts on proposed upgrade for Class A FMs

You might be happy with the upgrade if you owned a fully spaced Class A.. On the other hand, you might be quite displeased if you owned a Class B and a Class A increased power and moved 8 kilometers closer to you on your frequency.
I'll go one better: Some AM 'hate-talk' formatted new FM moving in next to my Pop or AC station would be the equivalent of Mary Kay Letourneau and her former student/husband Vili Fualaau moving in next door to your home.
 
Many of the 80-90 allotments were tickets to bankruptcy. However, I found much more valuable channels and got to own some FM's.
Where they were located, usually to COLs in the middle of nowhere, it was impossible to have the potential of one with a large population count. Some that fit in to near the center of larger cities are doing quite well, and have stronger signals than many Class Bs and Class Cs which barely cover the COL with a City Grade 70 dBu signal.
 
Remember, we're just talking a 2.2 dB stronger signal under this Petition. And C3s and proposed C4s are only allowed in Zone II. A more general and applicable revision to rules in order to upgrade or relocate is in order. The NAB and Big Group Owners will hold this up anyway, so there should be something more than this which would allow more general changes.

A complete analysis of the proposed Class A10 needs to be done to see if the separations are acceptable under current interference rules.

Again, some changes may be good, but this needs to apply more generally. The NAB and Big Group Owners will squawk anyway. "Let's give them something to squawk about" that's more general. Big stations and large group owners eventually see benefits themselves, like they did with Part 73.215, now one of the most popular rules for stations big and small.
The Zone I equivalent of a C3 is a B1, but with a more generous protection contour.
 
I attribute that to in most instances, the much earlier move by governments away from AM. And honestly, the U.S. consumer market doesn't directly relate to other cultures regarding media consumption, including Europe, Asia, or South American countries where the government is much more involved.
There was no movement "away from AM" in Latin America except the case in the last 10 to 15 years in Brazil where they created an extended FM band where channels 2 to 6 were.

When Mexico took up the issue, they realized due to lobbying by the CIRT that AM was declining and offered ways for AMs to migrate. A somewhat better solution than translators in the US, and achieved by relaxing second adjacent spacing.

Everywhere else, AMs are on their own, from Guatemala to Chile.
And that's because of what influence? The government. Do you honestly think U.S. listeners 18-34 would be interested in government-centric talk programming? There's one already on radio and TV and streaming. It's called CSPAN. CSPAN has never exactly lit the world afire.
Throughout the rest of the Hemisphere, talk takes many shapes and forms... not just political and not just partisan. This is a social issue, I guess, but most markets have around six or more talkers doing a variety of "focus" aspects of talk.
 
We can't afford the radio stations we currently have. Adding more won't help.
This is more about improving the competitiveness of existing stations, not adding more.
 
There was no movement "away from AM" in Latin America except the case in the last 10 to 15 years in Brazil where they created an extended FM band where channels 2 to 6 were.

When Mexico took up the issue, they realized due to lobbying by the CIRT that AM was declining and offered ways for AMs to migrate. A somewhat better solution than translators in the US, and achieved by relaxing second adjacent spacing.
But still required the government to push for a move away from AM. Just because some countries didn't, doesn't mean it didn't happen in others.
Throughout the rest of the Hemisphere, talk takes many shapes and forms... not just political and not just partisan. This is a social issue, I guess, but most markets have around six or more talkers doing a variety of "focus" aspects of talk.
Funny, I thought we were talking about a proposal in the U.S.
 
But still required the government to push for a move away from AM. Just because some countries didn't, doesn't mean it didn't happen in others.
It happened as stations either sold to religious groups, migrated to FM or signed off.

With some exceptions in Mexico, the rest of the nations to the south of us never authorized daytimers or directional stations (unless the station wanted to be directional). So most stations were fully competitive but wanted to move to FM

Some of us early-on saw the future potential; I got licenses for over a dozen in Ecuador in the late 60's. AM station owners who did not see the future got slaughtered.
Funny, I thought we were talking about a proposal in the U.S.
What I am saying is that such a change towards more talk programming on FM has occurred all across Latin America. The over-congestion of AM due to daytimers and deadly directional stations and the FCC's insistence in community stations (Old Class IV AMs and current class A FMs) made a lot of stations non-viable; it was due to regulations.
 
Some of us early-on saw the future potential; I got licenses for over a dozen in Ecuador in the late 60's. AM station owners who did not see the future got slaughtered.
And that's the bottom line: Here in the States, there are plenty of owners who have had ample time to gamble that AM would remain viable forever. When it doesn't look good for the band, Commissioner Pai gives them a gift, but it's still not good enough.
As BigA and I have mentioned, they managed to trash the AM band by needless overcrowding over the years, now they want to do the same to the FM band. What's the definition of insanity?
What I am saying is that such a change towards more talk programming on FM has occurred all across Latin America.
But, you're savvy when it comes to Spanish and English. What new talk programming is being suggested by existing U.S. AM broadcasters which is being proposed for the FM band that would be so popular? Again, we're not talking about Latin Countries.
Answer: there isn't. Existing AM broadcasters will/are moving their syndicated political talk programming to translators just because it's cheap to do.
The over-congestion of AM due to daytimers and deadly directional stations and the FCC's insistence in community stations (Old Class IV AMs and current class A FMs) made a lot of stations non-viable; it was due to regulations.
So, you don't think it had anything to do with lack of compelling programming on these stations? The Commission didn't force these licensees to file for, or purchase these shoehorned stations onto the band. If there's no room, it doesn't make any sense to make more by changing separations.
 
It's amazing how well some extremely directional AM stations have done in ratings over the years though, even though part of the market is not well served.

Some stations have relocated to try to get more area served where the nulls were, but it's rarely an unmitigated improvement, even with 50000 watts. One theory is that areas further out are higher elevation, drier, and lower conductivity, than the flatter, wet areas within a few miles of large bodies of water, where most cities and high population density are located.
 
That is still an A in a market that is composed of many counties. It only covers a portion of that market.
True, but it was worth several million dollars at the time. One needed to be born 10 years before me to be able to grab a Class B.
If one came into this world 10 years after me, opportunity would have been very limited.

So before any of us gets the big head about our success we need to give credit where it is due. Some call it lady luck. Or was it the grace of God?

This was the Land of Opportunity back then. Maybe it was the Golden Age of America that I grew up in?
 
Last edited:
True, but it was worth several million dollars at the time. One needed to be born 10 years before me to be able to grab a Class B.
If one came into this world 10 years after me, opportunity would have been very limited.

So before any of us gets the big head about our success we need to give credit where it is due. Some call it lady luck. Or was it the grace of God?
I think it was "vision" but we don't think the same way about our own mistakes!
This was the Land of Opportunity back then. Maybe it was the Golden Age of America that I grew up in?
It was the golden age for an FM if you got a bunch of "free" licenses in the 60's and managed to make them work.

As mentioned before, I filed for the first FM anywhere in northern South America (Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela) and put it on the air in 1966. It was profitable in its first year, and I applied for a whole bunch... 6 just in Quito alone. I spent half my time building transmitters and antennas!

The most amazing thing was to flip "plates on" and go to a tuner and find you have the only signal on an entire band.

Fortunately, at the time we did not even have a commercial TV station in the market but most of those "stereo consoles" everyone in the middle and upper income groups had at home came with FM. So there were, in 1966, more FM sets than TV sets and they were all waiting for something to listen to. But at the next Broadcaster Association meeting, I was called an "idiot" for putting "stupid" stations on the air and "distracting advertisers" from the stations that actually had audience.
 
As mentioned before, I filed for the first FM anywhere in northern South America (Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela) and put it on the air in 1966. It was profitable in its first year, and I applied for a whole bunch... 6 just in Quito alone. I spent half my time building transmitters and antennas!

The most amazing thing was to flip "plates on" and go to a tuner and find you have the only signal on an entire band.
Kind of like WIAA Interlochen and WWTV-FM Cadillac in Northern Michigan in the early 1960s. There weren't that many stations until the 1970s and then Docket 80-90 stations in the 1990s. Still wondering what you could have DXed with a good 10 element FM antenna and receiver there in the early 1960s. Even until in the 1980s, it was possible to get scores of distant stations regularly near Pellston. Now it's really jammed up with all the new stations and translators. DXing FM is more difficult now.

Under more recent rules, most of the Class As have been able to upgrade to Class C2 there. Very few are Commercial Class As now.
 
Kind of like WIAA Interlochen and WWTV-FM Cadillac in Northern Michigan in the early 1960s. There weren't that many stations until the 1970s and then Docket 80-90 stations in the 1990s. Still wondering what you could have DXed with a good 10 element FM antenna and receiver there in the early 1960s. Even until in the 1980s, it was possible to get scores of distant stations regularly near Pellston. Now it's really jammed up with all the new stations and translators. DXing FM is more difficult now.

Under more recent rules, most of the Class As have been able to upgrade to Class C2 there. Very few are Commercial Class As now.
I had the Radio Shack Archer Supreme Antenna and a JVC tuner on the east side of Indianapolis in the mid 70's. I could hear the 100 KW station on 98.9 from Petoskey, Michigan just about every night. It was 400 miles away and it came in in stereo.

 
I think it was "vision" but we don't think the same way about our own mistakes!

It was the golden age for an FM if you got a bunch of "free" licenses in the 60's and managed to make them work.

As mentioned before, I filed for the first FM anywhere in northern South America (Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela) and put it on the air in 1966. It was profitable in its first year, and I applied for a whole bunch... 6 just in Quito alone. I spent half my time building transmitters and antennas!

The most amazing thing was to flip "plates on" and go to a tuner and find you have the only signal on an entire band.

Fortunately, at the time we did not even have a commercial TV station in the market but most of those "stereo consoles" everyone in the middle and upper income groups had at home came with FM. So there were, in 1966, more FM sets than TV sets and they were all waiting for something to listen to. But at the next Broadcaster Association meeting, I was called an "idiot" for putting "stupid" stations on the air and "distracting advertisers" from the stations that actually had audience.
Kind of had to become the expert yourself to succeed. It's also been said ,"It's not just what you know. But, who you know." I can't forget those who were more successful who befriended me and shared there expertise.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom