It's also entirely possible that, for those who haven't heard it, Conway's first hour would be a better, more energetic hour than a fourth live hour would have been.
Yes, and it's probably why linear radio is losing audience.
As far back as the 1960s, Dick Whittinghill at KMPC in Los Angeles didn't do a four-hour show as much as he did two two-hour shows. Different records, but the same bits---on the assumption that the audience there at 6:00 a.m. was gone by 8:00.
And by the late 1970s, it was a three-hour show instead, with Whittinghill ending at 9:00am, followed by three hours each of Geoff Edwards, Wink Martindale, and Gary Owens. Which had to be easier on Whitt.
You remember it better than I, Mike, and I defer to your memory.
I didn't listen to KMPC until Gary Owens came aboard.
Yes, there is no indication that 9-10 pm is a repeat...Is it a deception? Are they suggesting the 9-10 hour is live when it's not?
Easier, maybe. But at minimum they've saved the production costs for an hour. At this stage in radio, budgetary concerns are always among the considerations.
OK, fine...back to griping about KRTH's playlist!
It would be more productive to gripe about KFI's playlist.OK, fine...back to griping about KRTH's playlist!
It would be more productive to gripe about KFI's playlist.
Songs (oldies and now current songs too) tend to be shorter than they were in the 70s-90s - I remember most songs were between 3 and 4 1/2 minutes long. Now they are almost all on the short end of 3 minutes or less than that. I remember without ads, most stations could get through 14 or 15 songs per hour, so I usually base that on 15 songs per hour (might be even more now) - so if a station playlist is based on a week between rotations, that station would have over 2,500 songs in their playlist. Most stations have an A rotation of top songs, a B rotation of lesser played but still familiar songs and maybe a C rotation of rarities that are nonetheless still remembered fondly or not so fondly. So I think most stations want to showcase their A and B songs more than anything else. I personally love wider varieties, but even looking at the 80s decade, I'm sure there are only about 200 or 300 "Top songs" - maybe less. These are the songs that you are most likely to hear on any particular station every day, peppered with a good variety of B songs (maybe another 200-400) and then the rarities, which probably number less than 200. Even with that, you're looking at maybe 900-1000 songs tops.An oldies station that covers muttiple formats and literally hundreds of artists with thousands of titles to choose from should go at least a week without repeating a song.
Once again, check the avatar. 🤯Y'know, it's been like-----FIFTY YEARS since I heard Steve & Eydie on KFI. What the hell?
I am not quite as old as you guys, but yes, I will take Lohman and Barkley over Handel's marginal legal advice and even more marginal humor in the mornings.Y'know, it's been like-----FIFTY YEARS since I heard Steve & Eydie on KFI. What the hell?
Bill Handel is best when he is serious and intelligently discussing a topic. The self deprecating curmudgeon jokes between him and Neil Saavedra are tiresome.I am not quite as old as you guys, but yes, I will take Lohman and Barkley over Handel's marginal legal advice and even more marginal humor in the mornings.
Bill Handel is best when he is serious and intelligently discussing a topic. The self deprecating curmudgeon jokes between him and Neil Saavedra are tiresome.
We know each other, remember? I wasn't being serious, either.Once again, check the avatar. 🤯
It seems like 55 years since Steve and/or Eydie have been relevant in any way. (Except maybe as a Vegas nostalgia act.)We know each other, remember? I wasn't being serious, either.
I was also wrong.
It's been more like 55 years since I heard Steve & Eydie on KFI.
Oh wow. ANOTHER example of how radio used to be both fun and entertaining. These days, it may be entertaining, but they took the fun out a long time ago.Bill and Neil should have listened to their predecessors: