bpatrick said:
azumanga said:
anotherguy said:
I think daylight time should be year round and nationwide, or not have it at all.
Russia is experimenting with year round Daylight Savings Time this year. But personally, I'd rather just have nationwide Standard Time all year long.
I (and a lot of you) lived through DST in the winter of 1974; I was a freshman at the University of Georgia at the time and was going to my first class (9 AM) in the dark. I'd take year-round standard time (which we had in North Carolina until 1967, and you couldn't tell that much difference in sunrise or sunset) over year-round daylight time any day.
I thought year round DST was the best thing ever. It was "technically" proven that less energy was used when
it was still dark in the mornings vs afternoon, based on typical lighting habits.
But the only places it made a big difference (for good or bad, as perceived by each person's preferences),
was near time zone divisions and places where time zones are way too wide.
This provides the residents the choice of an "unacceptably" dark morning or evening, as perceived.
I was fine with going to school while it was still dark and leave as much daylight as possible for after school.
But it did worry too many parents.
Seems it started gettting light while I was on the bus to school in 74...which would mean that 30 miles east, the kids got to
school in the eastern time zone and it must have been dark for most of the first hour of school.
For a real mind-twist put this into your search engine: "What time is it in Indiana?"
There's an exhaustive, mind boggling description of Indiana time. Arizona would have just as good a story, I bet.