• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

TMO Changes

A

Aries328

Guest
This is my first post on these boards, and after reading all of the comments on the changes TMO made with their "FM ChannelCast," I just had to put in my two cents.

I am so saddened by the loss of WLIR -- not once, but TWICE! -- and this time it seems for good. I was one of their many loyal listeners, and while I had difficulty picking up the 107.1 signal, it was comforting to know they broadcast on the internet (when the stream was working). You just couldn't find this unique mix of music anywhere else, and the DJ's were also what made the station special. R.I.P. 'LIR, you are sorely missed!

The new mess on 107.1 is unlistenable. Really, truly is. I heard some standard on there the other night with the title to the effect of "It's getting better all the time..." or something (should've written it down, it was pretty funny -- in a sad way). A mix of chill music would be fine -- and from what the press release said, I thought it may not be so bad. I was wrong.

I liked Party 105 -- definitely more of a dance fan than R&B/hip-hop -- but the station had an energy, as others have said, that, even if most of the music survived to "Not Really Party Hits, FM Channel 105," would most likely still be missing. I have no problem with a "Hits" station, but if that's how you're going to program, don't mislead the listeners! Yes, I like Kelly Clarkson, but no, her ballads are not "party" music. Unless they have a warped view of what constitutes party music...which is entirely possible. Just glad I still have 'KTU to listen to! (Speaking of which, Vic Latino did a very classy shout-out to Party 105 the night after its demise, and played a couple of great dance songs in their memory and to honor the former DJ's -- not sure if anyone else caught that?)

98.5 came out of this the least "injured," so it seems. I didn't really listen to The Bone, and from what I've heard of the new 98.5, it does seem pretty similar.

So the big question is: How is it possible that TMO managed to misrepresent not one, but two of the three new stations (sorry, "channels") so badly in their press release? Not much positive has come of these changes, at least for the listeners...or now former listeners.

One last thought -- it's quite depressing that if this is the future of terrestrial radio (hoping beyond hope that it's not!), where does that leave all of those aspiring DJ's who listened to their favorite voices that are now for the moment silenced? Perhaps this is a bit overly dramatic, but let's face it -- classic airchecks are sought out for the DJ's, not some automated playlist! Let's hope other companies have more sense than TMO!

T.J.
Fairfield, CT
 
Hey TJ,

I really enjoyed reading your post. You bring up very good points. I've not yet listened to these stations, but the information that I'm reading on the boards indicate that they are not as well programmed as they said they would be and nobody's really come out and said what am amazing transformation it's been.

I can definitely understand your view of TMO "misrepresenting" the changes and it's absolutely true. Not to defend them, but just to play devil's advocate, they wouldn't come out and say that these changes are a PR attempt and they really suck. But yeah, they did absolutely misrepresent their changes. This isn't really the first time that's happened, though. When "The Box" did the "Flashback Weekend" Labor Day weekend 2004, they said there would be guest DJ's, vintage concerts, and much more (I can't recall exactly what it was). In reality, there were no guest DJs (hell, barely any DJs - it was motsly automated) and the concerts were edited poorly and the sound was lacking (factoring in that they are ~20 years old). The DJs were almost nonexistant and there weren't very many announcements.

It will be interesting to see what happens with these changes. Ultimately, it will be up to the advertisers who will be footing the bill. I wonder what they are going to do with existing contracts, which should be interesting, because the advertisers are paying for ad time that they can't really get, so I guess it's applied to the "blocks of time" on the stations.

If you look on the "FM Channel Casting" website, you'll see how they are also misrepresenting these changes as "pseudo-satellite radio" by saying that it's the "nation's ONLY competely FREE music source." Last time I checked, I never got an invoice from a radio station for tuning in.. This move is basically playing on what they're hoping is listener stupdity.

I guess we'll see how it plays out over time..

> This is my first post on these boards, and after reading all
> of the comments on the changes TMO made with their "FM
> ChannelCast," I just had to put in my two cents.
>
> I am so saddened by the loss of WLIR -- not once, but TWICE!
> -- and this time it seems for good. I was one of their many
> loyal listeners, and while I had difficulty picking up the
> 107.1 signal, it was comforting to know they broadcast on
> the internet (when the stream was working). You just
> couldn't find this unique mix of music anywhere else, and
> the DJ's were also what made the station special. R.I.P.
> 'LIR, you are sorely missed!
>
> The new mess on 107.1 is unlistenable. Really, truly is. I
> heard some standard on there the other night with the title
> to the effect of "It's getting better all the time..." or
> something (should've written it down, it was pretty funny --
> in a sad way). A mix of chill music would be fine -- and
> from what the press release said, I thought it may not be so
> bad. I was wrong.
>
> I liked Party 105 -- definitely more of a dance fan than
> R&B/hip-hop -- but the station had an energy, as others have
> said, that, even if most of the music survived to "Not
> Really Party Hits, FM Channel 105," would most likely still
> be missing. I have no problem with a "Hits" station, but if
> that's how you're going to program, don't mislead the
> listeners! Yes, I like Kelly Clarkson, but no, her ballads
> are not "party" music. Unless they have a warped view of
> what constitutes party music...which is entirely possible.
> Just glad I still have 'KTU to listen to! (Speaking of
> which, Vic Latino did a very classy shout-out to Party 105
> the night after its demise, and played a couple of great
> dance songs in their memory and to honor the former DJ's --
> not sure if anyone else caught that?)
>
> 98.5 came out of this the least "injured," so it seems. I
> didn't really listen to The Bone, and from what I've heard
> of the new 98.5, it does seem pretty similar.
>
> So the big question is: How is it possible that TMO managed
> to misrepresent not one, but two of the three new stations
> (sorry, "channels") so badly in their press release? Not
> much positive has come of these changes, at least for the
> listeners...or now former listeners.
>
> One last thought -- it's quite depressing that if this is
> the future of terrestrial radio (hoping beyond hope that
> it's not!), where does that leave all of those aspiring DJ's
> who listened to their favorite voices that are now for the
> moment silenced? Perhaps this is a bit overly dramatic, but
> let's face it -- classic airchecks are sought out for the
> DJ's, not some automated playlist! Let's hope other
> companies have more sense than TMO!
>
> T.J.
> Fairfield, CT
>
 
Judge for yourself, Channel 107 is Streaming

Channel 107 is streaming. Its the same old horrible 20 kilobit stream for now at least, but let the comments fly on the format.
 
Re: Judge for yourself, Channel 107 is Streaming

> Channel 107 is streaming. Its the same old horrible 20
> kilobit stream for now at least, but let the comments fly on
> the format.
>
I just noticed this myself. I think the signal is cleaner now. No more distorted audio.

They kept the same URL for the stream http://www.streamaudio.com/stations/asx/WLIR_FM.asx

Remember folks, sampling counts as listening. Mark this in your Arbirton Book!
 
Ewww

I only listened to their stream for about 45 seconds. I couldn't stand it. It sounded like the most bizzaro thing I've ever heard.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom