oldmanradio said:Shoot From Hip said:oldmanradio said:Based on this type of thinking, no station would ever hire AccuWeather or The Weather Channel because every forecast they offer originates in either State College, PA (AccuWx) or Atlanta (TWC). How could they possibly know the weather in your local city, I wonder...could it be technology?
Call me stupid, but how a company believes someone who lives in Dallas can report traffic for several other cities as well as reporters who know those cities' streets and highways is just beyond me.
Regarding weather, when the National Weather Service in Fort Worth issues severe thunderstorm
or tornado warnings, do you tune to the Weather Channel or a local TV or radio station?
Most of us tune to a local TV or radio station, and on that, I would bet good money.
Tony
Tony Lyndell Williams
It's all I can do not to take you up on your offer. We don't live in the days of pony express. Using current digital tracking technology, freeway and street cameras, and other devices I won't identify, I can see traffic patterns more clearly in your city from where I sit 2000 miles away than the people working for certain traffic services in Dallas. And using your thinking, Clear Channel wouldn't be able to voicetrack from market to market, or use their own hub-and-spoke system for delivering news (San Diego stations, for example, get news from KFI/LA now). It's not the occasional freak storm we're talking about...it's the day-in and day-out delivery of information. The steamroller of change is coming; be careful not to stand in the way.
Shoot from the Hip,
We're talking apples and oranges.
And you truly are shooting from the hip ... sometimes with blanks.
Sure the technology exists to do the traffic from another city. That is not my point.
Regardless of what information you can obtain via sensors and cameras, etc., the local person still has more intimate knowledge of streets, highways, alternate routes than someone who lives out of town.
You're touting technology which I support. But the human factor is just as important, and you completely ignore that aspect.
If you think it is advantageous for San Diego stations to receive their news from KFI, KFWB or any other LA station, if you think voicetracking has improved radio, then you and I will just have to agree to disagree.
Airing Ryan Seacrest instead of a live and local show is, ironically, part of the reason radio is "old school" to younger listeners.
Tony
Tony Lyndell Williams
I don't recall giving an opinion on whether it's good or bad. I'm simply saying that's the reality, and you can either accept it or not. I think I'd prefer a major market quality traffic anchor doing reports for Omaha than someone who's never going to have the skills to leave Omaha...and the feedback from smaller market stations when they get a Dallas or Phoenix or Los Angeles or New York talent doing their reports supports that. It's also the reason many smaller market stations carry syndication: aside from saving money on local talent, the quality of the product is better.