Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Get involved. We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post. If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
I've searched in vain to find the antenna gain for a Shively 6812-3 Medium Power Circularly-Polarized FM Antenna. It's being fed 234 watts through ~114 meters of 7/8 heliax....
A two-bay CP antenna has slightly less than unity gain. A three-bay antenna would have a gain slightly less than 1.5.
Taking into account the line length, the combination of coax and antenna is probably close to unity.
Using 114 meters of Cablewave 7/8th air Heliax ( efficiency 72.85%), the ERP is 264 watts, assuming the antenna is mounted as a full-wave, with the listed 1.52 gain. If the cable is 7/8th foam, will mean a slightly lower ERP.
Checked the calculations--would be 258 watts. My program automatically entered the gain for the Shively antenna as 1.55, not 1.52. If 7/8th foam was used, minor difference, 257 watts ERP rounded.
Better picture. Looks like it uses interbay line, so the angle of the first picture may be deceiving--that top bay may be connected. I would guess that the gain of the half wave spaced antenna would be closer to 1.3, which would then indicate the ERP is close to 220 watts.
The Shively website doesn't list gain figures for the half-wave configuration of this antenna.
Looking at the un-cropped picture and mentally shifting the array up to align the bottom bay with the tower section's flange; I'm thinking you are right. Supposing the sections are 20 feet and that would put the top bay at the upper flange..... 10 foot spacing!
Remember seeing similar Shively antenna on the ground before it was installed for a B-1 station (11 kw ERP). Really tiny looking, especially compared with my 4 bay ERI (ERP 17 kw)
Tough to make a 100% call on this due to the angle. Remember that the zoom lens creates an effect that makes things look bigger than they appear... like when the batter looks giant compared to the pitcher when the zoom from center field is used.
Any way you can get a pic that's zoomed in but taken from farther back so the angle isn't as severe?
Well, according to your own license app, if it is constructed as prescribed, then it is full wave spaced as I suspected. The angle of the photo makes it look funny.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.