• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

TV in Baltimore and Washington DC

Speaking of markets that should be eliminated, I was thinking of Baltimore. It shouldn't be merged into D.C. Though it seems the defined Nielsen DMA is otherwise protecting a suffering market. Though the Census has done opposite, and other indicators - dying malls in the suburban Baltimore area (Owings Mills among others), and lack of good jobs seem to be showing Baltimore lacking an strong identity of its own. There is considerable overlap of signals in Baltimore, and the growth in the Baltimore market and everything good economically speaking is because of being nearby to D.C., Montgomery County, etc.

No doubt stations like WBAL 11 (NBC) and WJZ 13 (CBS) have a purpose. The VHF stations do serve an advertising and local news purpose for those working or living in Baltimore or Northern MD. But, some of the lesser watched Baltimore stations are newless identityless mid-market looking imitations of top market stations. Example being that Sinclair is there. Not only that, satellite customers are unable to receive the better D.C. PBS signals and network channels, to protect Baltimore.

A Howard County or Anne Arundel cable system will have D.C. channels lower than Baltimore on the dial. It was only recently that WBFF and WTTG swapped positions, making WBFF more noticeable. Over the air, D.C. stations penetrate north of Baltimore, and where they leave, WGAL and Philadelphia stations come in.

In the Washington D.C. immediate areas, no Baltimore stations have coverage.

TBN seems to be doing very well from its supporters, and with its evangelical Protestant shows, they have a strategy of getting nonbelievers into believing or atleast helping them grow. Some quickly famous TV telecasters include Joel Osteen and Joyce Meyer.

When TBN bought WGTW 48, it's addition of Philadelphia puts itself at contrast, in an otherwise Democratic Mid Atlantic. But, it might be viewed that the MidAtlantic is an area for TBN to work on.

Might they see opportunity to purchase a Baltimore UHF station, and bring TBN into the Baltimore/Washington region?

Broader question - Might Baltimore's lesser watched Us eventually serve a broader area of D.C. and Baltimore either going Spanish or religious, whereby the D.C. WB, UPN and Fox are imported to fulfill the network presence on cable?
 
Well sure....THe 24th largest TV market should be abolished!!!! Then TBN could get its hands on channels 2, 11, or 13 and start saving souls, and collecting money, from the godless Mid-Atlantic.
 
> Speaking of markets that should be eliminated, I was
> thinking of Baltimore. It shouldn't be merged into D.C.
> Though it seems the defined Nielsen DMA is otherwise
> protecting a suffering market. Though the Census has done
> opposite, and other indicators - dying malls in the suburban
> Baltimore area (Owings Mills among others), and lack of good
> jobs seem to be showing Baltimore lacking an strong identity
> of its own. There is considerable overlap of signals in
> Baltimore, and the growth in the Baltimore market and
> everything good economically speaking is because of being
> nearby to D.C., Montgomery County, etc.
>
> No doubt stations like WBAL 11 (NBC) and WJZ 13 (CBS) have a
> purpose. The VHF stations do serve an advertising and local
> news purpose for those working or living in Baltimore or
> Northern MD. But, some of the lesser watched Baltimore
> stations are newless identityless mid-market looking
> imitations of top market stations. Example being that
> Sinclair is there. Not only that, satellite customers are
> unable to receive the better D.C. PBS signals and network
> channels, to protect Baltimore.
>
> A Howard County or Anne Arundel cable system will have D.C.
> channels lower than Baltimore on the dial. It was only
> recently that WBFF and WTTG swapped positions, making WBFF
> more noticeable. Over the air, D.C. stations penetrate
> north of Baltimore, and where they leave, WGAL and
> Philadelphia stations come in.
>
> In the Washington D.C. immediate areas, no Baltimore
> stations have coverage.
>
> TBN seems to be doing very well from its supporters, and
> with its evangelical Protestant shows, they have a strategy
> of getting nonbelievers into believing or atleast helping
> them grow. Some quickly famous TV telecasters include Joel
> Osteen and Joyce Meyer.
>
> When TBN bought WGTW 48, it's addition of Philadelphia puts
> itself at contrast, in an otherwise Democratic Mid Atlantic.
> But, it might be viewed that the MidAtlantic is an area
> for TBN to work on.
>
> Might they see opportunity to purchase a Baltimore UHF
> station, and bring TBN into the Baltimore/Washington region?
>
>
> Broader question - Might Baltimore's lesser watched Us
> eventually serve a broader area of D.C. and Baltimore either
> going Spanish or religious, whereby the D.C. WB, UPN and Fox
> are imported to fulfill the network presence on cable?
>

Huh? Are you nuts? First off, you're talking about eliminating network affiliates from a city that's large enough to host the Ravens and Orioles. And, a relatively large market that provides Maryland with it's only real statewide news coverage.

And, how do you know that Baltimore is doing so badly? From what source did you get this information about the eventual demise of Baltimore?

Yes, its more blue collar than Washington and has a completely different atmosphere. Which is why it is actually UNDERSERVED by local radio and TV. But, it's a vibrant city with plenty of its own charms (pun intended).

Then, you start trumpeting that crap about felonious wasters of electricity like TBN as a suitable replacement for REAL channels. Joel Osteen is needed in Baltimore? Pullllleeeaaaazzzee! His infomercials make good money for struggling broadcasters, but are a total tune out for all but the least intelligent among us.

Yeah, and if I had my way, TBN, Daystar and all of those damn shopping channels would get their licenses pulled. There's enough garbage on TV as it is - that crap is such a waste of space.

No offense, but come on - are you for real?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom