This is not simply about "change" (which I reiterate: isn't always good); no, it's about idiotic programming choices. What's the goal of lazily running the same eps of Rosanne over and over again? Followed by the same episodes of Andy Griffith, over and over again? And the occasional "reality" series mixed into that. Series which, by the way, stink even by 'reality' show standards?
Honestly, how can you possibly defend that? Or the muddled way in which Viacom has lost positioning for most of its cable channels? Look at MTV's schedule. It's wandered so far off the mark that it's not even funny. Movies on MTV? Again, laziness and frugality on the part of Viacom.
Too bad Viacom isn't alone in this as even the Travel Channel is reduced to showing movies now. That's NOT what people expect of that channel either.
Yes, for the record, I thought that TV Land was a much better channel several years ago and, had they not changed course, I'd still be watching them. Judging from the comments here, I am not alone in that. However, this discussion goes way beyond whether they should have 'freshened up' the programming or not. Right now, they're a mess. That's what this is about.
Honestly, how can you possibly defend that? Or the muddled way in which Viacom has lost positioning for most of its cable channels? Look at MTV's schedule. It's wandered so far off the mark that it's not even funny. Movies on MTV? Again, laziness and frugality on the part of Viacom.
Too bad Viacom isn't alone in this as even the Travel Channel is reduced to showing movies now. That's NOT what people expect of that channel either.
Yes, for the record, I thought that TV Land was a much better channel several years ago and, had they not changed course, I'd still be watching them. Judging from the comments here, I am not alone in that. However, this discussion goes way beyond whether they should have 'freshened up' the programming or not. Right now, they're a mess. That's what this is about.