Another ridiculous use of "Woke" by someone who has no clue what it means.
Actually, I do understand the terminology of equality and so-called "progressive" (there is a term that means nearly the opposite of what it used to) because I am actively involved in consumer research here and outside the US. And most of that research is among Hispanics, one of the supposed beneficiaries of wokeness and which whom I mostly deal in Spanish.
Whether you think woke means "socially aware" (as in "awake to what is happening") or "believers that there are systemic injustices in American society and the need to address them" the term fundamentally revolves around "awareness".
To an undocumented immigrant from El Salvador, "woke" or its Spanish equivalent means "willing to accept me into their country". To a disabled person, it means "understanding". "Woke" is one of those terms that depends a lot on the color of the lens the person involved is wearing.
Ronald Reagan never understood Springsteen's "Born In The USA" either.
But, intelligently, by feigning misunderstanding, he defused the argument or point of the song.
Bottom line -- since Musk took over, Twitter has lost 66 percent of its value.
The funny thing about shares of stock is that you really do not loose anything at all unless you sell the shares.
A good example is the fact that the only people who actually lost money in the 2008 recession are the ones who sold their shares at the time. Those who held, on average, were ahead of the pre-recession levels just a few years later.
Or some did what I did: I sold everything and on the same day bought other similar issues. Sort of selling, in New York Central in the 1950's and buying Santa Fe the same day. In the process, I got a tax loss I carried forward for half a decade while the new purchases appreciated, on average, along with the market.
Musk will survive and so will the Earth if Twitter disappears...
Most people's lack of understanding of equities markets is astounding.