landtuna said:After really enjoying the show through the first six seasons I gave it a jaundiced eye during the 7th (when Charlie was acting like a 7-year old off screen) and dumped it entirely when Kutcher came aboard. I dumped it for all the reasons you cited and the one that upset me the most was the virtual absence of an excellent supporting cast. How the producers could make a mistake like that is not fathomable.
I don't know how the show maintains its high rankings as it has been absolute trash. Cryer used to be the perfect foil for Charlie. Now he is just a sniveling wimp and no one else in the current cast deserves mention.
As for the musical (which I did not watch), I happened to catch a "news" item on the 'Net a few days ago which featured Cryer talking about why they did it and his explanation was that "they were just having fun". I assume he meant the cast because it appears the audience didn't.
I suspect the milking will end at the season's end. Cryer and Jones certainly have enough money that they never have to work again if they don't want to and Kutcher can go back to his usual pile of crap productions.
Here is the thing... unless the cast does not want to do the show, it is going to be renewed. CBS has to love the numbers it is pulling in - it is keeping most of the audience from Big Bang Theory. I read somewhere that 2 1/2 Men (love it or not) is CBS' number 2 scripted show in the key 18-49 demo.
I agree the show is not as good as it once was... I don't even think the writing is as good as it was when Charlie Sheen was a cast member. But television, like it or not, is a numbers game and as long as the numbers are good and the cast is willing to do the show it will get renewed.