It appears that North Texas Public Broadcasting has applied for a digital translator on channel 25 in Tyler, presumably for KERA-13. http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/tvq?list=0&facid=183447.
Greg Branch said:It appears that North Texas Public Broadcasting has applied for a digital translator on channel 25 in Tyler, presumably for KERA-13. http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/tvq?list=0&facid=183447.
dhett said:https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/w...t=25&appn=101335324&formid=346&fac_num=183447
Scroll down to Section III - Engineering Data
azumanga said:dhett said:https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/w...t=25&appn=101335324&formid=346&fac_num=183447
Scroll down to Section III - Engineering Data
Section III tells nothing -- the above link is a blank form, other than the facility number.
easttxtv said:Dumb question while we're on the subject..... Would N.T.P.B. have the capability (if they're even wanting to do it) to have locally-relevant (i.e., courses offered at Tyler Junior College if it's Tyler) telecourse programs from each translator, or would it be easier/better/whatever for all translators to be exact-same copies programming-wise?
tested said:easttxtv said:Dumb question while we're on the subject..... Would N.T.P.B. have the capability (if they're even wanting to do it) to have locally-relevant (i.e., courses offered at Tyler Junior College if it's Tyler) telecourse programs from each translator, or would it be easier/better/whatever for all translators to be exact-same copies programming-wise?
That's not going to happen. KERA ditched the telecourses when it sold off KDTN a few years back. If they don't have the money to do Dallas Co. telecourses, they're not going to do something like that in Tyler. You can bet that the programming on all the translators will be identical to KERA.
tested said:easttxtv said:Dumb question while we're on the subject..... Would N.T.P.B. have the capability (if they're even wanting to do it) to have locally-relevant (i.e., courses offered at Tyler Junior College if it's Tyler) telecourse programs from each translator, or would it be easier/better/whatever for all translators to be exact-same copies programming-wise?
That's not going to happen. KERA ditched the telecourses when it sold off KDTN a few years back. If they don't have the money to do Dallas Co. telecourses, they're not going to do something like that in Tyler. You can bet that the programming on all the translators will be identical to KERA.
Greg Branch said:I can remember in the 70's seeing a dual station id for KERA 13 and 24. IIRC, the calls of the WF repeater were KIDZ.
txchipk said:Non-full power TV stations are either LPTVs, translators, or boosters. Translators (which is what this is for) and boosters cannot originate programming; they can only relay their parent station. LPTVs can be operated as their own entity (i.e. the KLPN-LP/KTPN-LP).
Greg Branch said:Those interested in television history would like to read the Wikipedia entry for KERA. It gives a history of the Wichita Falls repeater, originally on channel 24, now on 44.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KERA-TV
I can remember in the 70's seeing a dual station id for KERA 13 and 24. IIRC, the calls of the WF repeater were KIDZ.
w9wi said:It later surrendered the KIDZ full-power license and took out a translator license as K24AA. (I'm not 100% certain the K24AA calls are correct. The Wikipedia article is my only source for those calls, and the article is flawed in some other ways.) That's the same license that was eventually modified to channel 44 and finally to digital.
dhett said:w9wi said:It later surrendered the KIDZ full-power license and took out a translator license as K24AA. (I'm not 100% certain the K24AA calls are correct. The Wikipedia article is my only source for those calls, and the article is flawed in some other ways.) That's the same license that was eventually modified to channel 44 and finally to digital.
The calls were K24AD, and I'd be surprised if the station has gone digital already, as they were just granted the flash cut CP last month. I've corrected both in the KERA article, but the section on the Wichita Falls translator service is very poorly researched and not reliable at all.
Greg Branch said:tested said:easttxtv said:Dumb question while we're on the subject..... Would N.T.P.B. have the capability (if they're even wanting to do it) to have locally-relevant (i.e., courses offered at Tyler Junior College if it's Tyler) telecourse programs from each translator, or would it be easier/better/whatever for all translators to be exact-same copies programming-wise?
That's not going to happen. KERA ditched the telecourses when it sold off KDTN a few years back. If they don't have the money to do Dallas Co. telecourses, they're not going to do something like that in Tyler. You can bet that the programming on all the translators will be identical to KERA.
They certainly would have the capability to do it on a sub-channel, but I suspect that it would be more of a situation where KERA would lease a sub-channel to TJC or UTT and the educational institution would produce and foot the bill for everything.