• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

U93 (South Bend) now back streaming

After a long period of switching streaming providers, U93 is back streaming. But the quality remains pretty poor:

http://www.streamaudio.com/stations/asx/WNDV_FM.asx<P ID="signature">______________
Searchable list of stations streaming from the USA
www.thestreamcenter.com</P>
 
> After a long period of switching streaming providers, U93 is
> back streaming. But the quality remains pretty poor:
>
> http://www.streamaudio.com/stations/asx/WNDV_FM.asx
>
Yeah, thats usually the way it goes. I wonder what is wrong with their stream procesing, and why they dont fix it. Do they figure most people wont care?
 
> > After a long period of switching streaming providers, U93
> is
> > back streaming. But the quality remains pretty poor:
> >
> > http://www.streamaudio.com/stations/asx/WNDV_FM.asx
> >
> Yeah, thats usually the way it goes. I wonder what is wrong
> with their stream procesing, and why they dont fix it. Do
> they figure most people wont care?

Are they running a separate processor for their stream or are they just feeding it directly from the airchain? Because if the latter is the case, that would probably explain it. I love the heck out of this station, but that processing... just... YOWZA! Put some midrange in there, folks!<P ID="signature">______________
radiodude.jpg

http://theradioblog.blogspot.com</P>
 
> Are they running a separate processor for their stream or
> are they just feeding it directly from the airchain?
> Because if the latter is the case, that would probably
> explain it. I love the heck out of this station, but that
> processing... just... YOWZA! Put some midrange in there,
> folks!
>
I used to only remember U93 sounding horrible if I used Winamp, but it's horrible with any audio program, using a Windows 2000 OS at work, on a T1.
 
> > Are they running a separate processor for their stream or
> > are they just feeding it directly from the airchain?
> > Because if the latter is the case, that would probably
> > explain it. I love the heck out of this station, but that
>
> > processing... just... YOWZA! Put some midrange in there,
> > folks!
> >
> I used to only remember U93 sounding horrible if I used
> Winamp, but it's horrible with any audio program, using a
> Windows 2000 OS at work, on a T1.
>
its not there fault, its streamingaudio all of their streams sound horrible<P ID="signature">______________
http://natedoggairchecks.6x.to/
sfradio (at) gmail (dot) com</P>
 
> > > Are they running a separate processor for their stream
> or
> > > are they just feeding it directly from the airchain?
> > > Because if the latter is the case, that would probably
> > > explain it. I love the heck out of this station, but
> that
> >
> > > processing... just... YOWZA! Put some midrange in
> there,
> > > folks!
> > >
> > I used to only remember U93 sounding horrible if I used
> > Winamp, but it's horrible with any audio program, using a
> > Windows 2000 OS at work, on a T1.
> >
> its not there fault, its streamingaudio all of their streams
> sound horrible
>
Very true.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom