MsMusicRadio said:Who is that? ???
According to the only map (the new contour map) on the FCC website and comparing the two maps on Radio-locator, it looks as though as improvement to the south will be minimal.ai4i said:At least, a CP to do so.
Just letting out their null toward Tampa to the south.
Antenna will remain at nearly the same height.
For WUSF-HD2 and WSMR.Cedric said:It's WUSF FM's translator.
I would guess that they have purchased a new omni-directional antenna with more bays (elements) which allow the use of less transmitter power for the same ERP, but with the top bay at the same height as the old top bay, the center of radiation will be somewhat lower. In this early configuration, the center of radiation was only about half the tower height. Of course, NINE-FM also had other issues.drt said:I am wondering why WUSF HD2 is lowering the antenna by approximately 4 meters...lowering it seems counter-productive.
drt
There are three reasons that I can think of that WFLA's translator is going to have a stronger signal in most parts of Tampa proper than WSMR's translator.MsMusicRadio said:Why does 105.9 seem stronger in Tampa than 103.9?
They are way south, but will not cover the USF campus well..drt said:1) 105.9's antenna is located in a more central location
I have not found a signal problem with 105.9 at Haley's. In fact, I am quite pleased with the coverage of the translator. My only criticism is that the complaints to the North of the Market for the 970 signal and the translator does not address that issue.ai4i said:Mostly, #1...
They are way south, but will not cover the USF campus well..drt said:1) 105.9's antenna is located in a more central location
druidhillsradio said:My question is: Why does 970 WFLA "need' a translator? I think I know the answer. :-\