• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WAAF sold to EMF....

David wants to believe that EMF is totally pure and philanthropic. Does anyone question where they got the $10 million to buy WAAF? They are a calculating corporation that makes big money for its top management. Do any of these "Christians" ever read the historical quotes attributed to Jesus and his thoughts on money & extreme wealth? EMF is a business.

If people want to support this type of product, they are free to do so. EMF will gladly take their money...

The EMF financials are available online. They are audited by an independent accounting firm. They are quite detailed, and likely rank in the top quarter, at least, of non-profit financials that are available.

$10 million is a small amount. They paid $50 million in LA for an FM, and appear to have spent around $200 million in the last 14 months on properties that were for sale at bargain prices since nobody else wanted them. They are also rapidly increasing their outreach and counseling programs and other non-radio activities.

The top management is considerably underpaid by industry standards.

On the other hand, we have public TV & Radio operations with near million dollar salaries. In these cases, non-profits compete to hire the best fund-raising administrators possible in an area where the best have multiple choices to consider.

Personally, I am quite professionally envious of the EMF management. They are doing something endurable with radio as a base, but extending into other areas such as Internet options and personal services for their members.

I once programmed a pair of stations for Cardinal Rickets Landazuri of Peru, and found it very satisfying doing a format that was intended to be both entertaining and a reminder to Catholics of the tenets of their faith in little 30" messages. So doing religious radio can be rewarding beyond the income.
 
Plenty of heritage stations do this, especially before being sold to EMF. Think WPLJ, WCCC, WLUP, etc.

In LA, they did a similar "goodbye" period. The PD, one of the best AOR programmers I have known, was present all the time and everyone was given guidelines on how to be proud but not offensive.
 
Hearing that WAAF was to re-position itself, add new local jocks etc, as of March 2 (re-launch). Then EMF came in and said, here's some money, and the deal was quickly put together...(@bostonradiotweet: "Mistress Carrie mentioned during today’s eulogy that March 2 was going to be WAAF’s relaunch date. Told from sources with direct knowledge of the situation,’relaunch’ would’ve included a revised playlist/positioning and brand new line-up with local staff."

Now it'll be gone in a little over 24 hours. And the streaming of "WAAF" on the HD2s and radio dot com? No DJs. All automation.
 
Now who said that EMF has wealth? They use their resources for the kingdom.

The Kingdom? What is that? No one in EMF management has any Wall Street investments or personal wealth of any kind? They all have taken the vow of poverty, right?

When is that Rapture thing happening? After all the believers are gone, maybe some good music will return to Radio...
 
The Kingdom? What is that? No one in EMF management has any Wall Street investments or personal wealth of any kind? They all have taken the vow of poverty, right?

When is that Rapture thing happening? After all the believers are gone, maybe some good music will return to Radio...

Bach and many others composed entirely, or nearly so, for the church -- farewell, Jesu Joy of Man's Desiring, so long, Messiah. But then, those masterpieces would only be lost to noncommercial stations.

Oh, and poor old Charlie Daniels, before being taken up in the Rapture, will have to re-record "The Devil Went Down to Georgia" so Johnny goes to hell and Satan keeps his fiddle!
 
After all the believers are gone, maybe some good music will return to Radio...

Not unless someone who likes good music buys some radio stations. Otherwise those stations will be bought by the someone else. Perhaps wealthy lovers of Polka music.

Remember: Every time EMF buys a station, that means it was available to anyone with ready cash. That could have been a rich rock star. Instead it was EMF.
 
"Non commercial" based on listener donations (and "educational" as in educating about Christianity) and their workers probably get a healthy cut of that.
It may be easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter the kingdom of God, but...no vow of poverty here.
 
The Kingdom? What is that? No one in EMF management has any Wall Street investments or personal wealth of any kind? They all have taken the vow of poverty, right?

When is that Rapture thing happening? After all the believers are gone, maybe some good music will return to Radio...

I really think that you have no idea what the true Gospel or Christianity is truly about! The Bible NEVER said that you had to take a vow of poverty! It only says not to be greedy and store up WEALTH for yourself, and to not only give, but give generously instead!

As David has pointed out, EMF is quite utilizing efficiently the resources that they have been given them. Now does NPR or other entities do the same? I am sincerely asking here.
 
Now does NPR or other entities do the same? I am sincerely asking here.

Take a look at how NPR stations are run. The bulk of their programming is national. Yes they have local staff, yes they create local content, but the bulk of it comes from a centralized place, just like EMF. NPR itself gets the bulk of its money from corporate donors, not individual listeners. In Boston, you have a couple of stations running the exact same shows.
 
Take a look at how NPR stations are run. The bulk of their programming is national. Yes they have local staff, yes they create local content, but the bulk of it comes from a centralized place, just like EMF. NPR itself gets the bulk of its money from corporate donors, not individual listeners. In Boston, you have a couple of stations running the exact same shows.

Well, that's not entirely true. At least once a year NPR (or the local stations of them) have fund raisers or telethons asking listeners to donate.

But what is good for the goose is also good for the gander! People give to their local NPR Stations because they value and want that content!

The same is true for Educational Media Foundation Stations also, except their content just so happens to be Christian Music instead.
 
The Kingdom? What is that? No one in EMF management has any Wall Street investments or personal wealth of any kind? They all have taken the vow of poverty, right?

Nearly everyone who has a 401k or retirement program from their union or the government has "Wall Street" investments in that plan.

I do not know, but I would guess that the EMF staff has some kind of retirement program; the most common among smallish businesses is a 401k that offers various mutual fund options.

I know of several commercial radio professionals who have joined EMF. They did not have, if at all, a significant increase in income. They joined because they believed in the project and, of course, saw a better future in listener-supported radio than in commercial radio.
 
Well, that's not entirely true. At least once a year NPR (or the local stations of them) have fund raisers or telethons asking listeners to donate.

NPR by-laws specifically prohibit it from asking listeners to donate. Only member stations are allowed to fundraise that way. They may use NPR hosts to help, but the money is raised by the stations.
 
Hearing that WAAF was to re-position itself, add new local jocks etc, as of March 2 (re-launch). Then EMF came in and said, here's some money, and the deal was quickly put together...(@bostonradiotweet: "Mistress Carrie mentioned during today’s eulogy that March 2 was going to be WAAF’s relaunch date. Told from sources with direct knowledge of the situation,’relaunch’ would’ve included a revised playlist/positioning and brand new line-up with local staff."

Now it'll be gone in a little over 24 hours. And the streaming of "WAAF" on the HD2s and radio dot com? No DJs. All automation.

I wonder if WODS if ratings don't improve try this WAAF relaunch attempt.
 
I wonder if WODS if ratings don't improve try this WAAF relaunch attempt.

It's certainly possible. WODS is getting its ass kicked by WXKS, and ditching a struggling CHR for the WAAF relaunch attempt might work, especially as Entercom just became $10 million richer. But WODS isn't down in the absolute doldrums that WAAF was either, so we'll see. I don't have access to the data Entercom has so I can only speculate on gut instinct.
 
It's certainly possible. WODS is getting its ass kicked by WXKS, and ditching a struggling CHR for the WAAF relaunch attempt might work, especially as Entercom just became $10 million richer.

$10 million is nothing to them... and, of course, the net is less after paying severance and other expenses such as legal.

The company bills an average of $130 million a month. Or $1.5 billion a year.
 
Not unless someone who likes good music buys some radio stations. Otherwise those stations will be bought by the someone else. Perhaps wealthy lovers of Polka music.

Remember: Every time EMF buys a station, that means it was available to anyone with ready cash. That could have been a rich rock star. Instead it was EMF.

I'm not entirely sure about this.

Isn't part of the point of commercial broadcasters selling to EMF to reduce competition? It's quite possible they would NOT want to sell to a local commercial (or locally focused noncommercial) broadcaster that might compete with them for revenues and audience share. Quite often, we never hear these stations being up for sale until they've already sold to EMF.
 
I'm not entirely sure about this.

Isn't part of the point of commercial broadcasters selling to EMF to reduce competition? It's quite possible they would NOT want to sell to a local commercial (or locally focused noncommercial) broadcaster that might compete with them for revenues and audience share. Quite often, we never hear these stations being up for sale until they've already sold to EMF.

I mentioned this as a side benefit of selling to a non-commercial operator when a broadcaster spins off a less desirable station. But this station only took about 2% of market revenues, so it will not make much of a difference.

Generally, EMF pays very low prices but takes advantage of the lack of buyers today to get even lower ones.
 
WAAF

WAAF got sold out cheap....The station should have sold for $107.5million and not $10.75million.

The question is...Why is WAAF billing itself in the Boston market when they are out of the Worcester area (Westborough)...<They are the in the top 5 in that market.
 
Entercom corporate has ZERO problem lying to airstaff to keep them in the dark regarding planned format changes or sales. In some cases, misinformation (unknowingly) is relayed by those same staffers to listeners.

Happened in Seattle (94.1). Happened in Detroit (98.7).

My suspicion is the supposed relaunch of WAAF was NEVER going to happen.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom