• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WABC iboc aircheck Imus first hour

I noticed this morning that the webcast audio of IMUS (from the WABC website) is actually VERY good. Surprisingly so...better than anything I've (yet) heard from AM HD!

Yeah, I know "wi-max" will kill HD Radio. Earth to people who believe that...you need a flash-based platform, which includes almost no pocket devices (phones, pdas, etc) for the player. You have to "jump through hoops" to access the stream. And that's true of more and more streaming audio. Not nearly as convenient (or even AVAILABLE) as a radio, where you just turn the damn thing on, and hit a pushbutton for the right preset.
 
Mike Walker said:
I noticed this morning that the webcast audio of IMUS (from the WABC website) is actually VERY good. Surprisingly so...better than anything I've (yet) heard from AM HD!

Yeah, I know "wi-max" will kill HD Radio. Earth to people who believe that...you need a flash-based platform, which includes almost no pocket devices (phones, pdas, etc) for the player. You have to "jump through hoops" to access the stream. And that's true of more and more streaming audio. Not nearly as convenient (or even AVAILABLE) as a radio, where you just turn the damn thing on, and hit a pushbutton for the right preset.

I have an idea Mike. Since your wife is wondering what to get you for Christmas, may I suggest a Roku Internet Radio? I think you'd actually like it. It IS a radio. It receives the stream wirelessly from any standard 802.xx wireless router, or you can plug it directly into an Ethernet port.

Mine does work just like a radio. It even has a very easy to use remote control. You can also use it to play audio files stored on other computers on your network. It's like having your own radio station, if you want to do that.

Many short-wave broadcasters simulcast their programming on the web. This sounds a lot better than receiving them off the air and is easy to use. If after using it for a while, and you think it is junk technology, then at least, you will have made your mind up by trying it.


I'll bet you like it. If not, it can become a "collector's item" right along with the HD version of the BA Receptor.
 
I'd LOVE to have a Roku, Chuck. But they're WAY more expensive, aren't they? Something like 300 bucks? YIKES! And people complain about the cost of HD Radio!
 
Mike Walker said:
I'd LOVE to have a Roku, Chuck. But they're WAY more expensive, aren't they? Something like 300 bucks? YIKES! And people complain about the cost of HD Radio!

The tuner only version starts at $129.00 on the Roku web site. They are also found in stores like Fry’s, sometimes for less than the web site price. I got an older version (M-500) for $69.95 at a store in Dallas. It works fine. Note, I said these are tuners only. They have RCA and optical outputs. I have found that they have enough poop to drive some reasonably efficient headphones with the appropriate adapter cable, but a quick fix is to use a set of powered computer speakers. You may have some sitting around. Of course, you could just plug it into your stereo or even you mixer in your studio area.
 
Thanks Chuck. You've definitely given me something to consider!
 
Is it just me, or are the artifacts on this WABC aircheck sufficient that wideband reception on something like a SuperRadio III, or Sony SRF-A100 (mine still has the "It's a Sony" sticker, and that "new radio smell) would sound quite a bit better?
 
Mike Walker said:
I'd LOVE to have a Roku, Chuck. But they're WAY more expensive, aren't they? Something like 300 bucks? YIKES! And people complain about the cost of HD Radio!

You also might consider these WiFi digital radios:
http://www.sangean.com/category.php?category_ID=12
http://www.robertsradio.co.uk/pages/wm201.html
http://www.pinnaclesys.com/PublicSite/uk/Products/Consumer+Products/Digital+Media+Adapters/Digital+Media+Player/SoundBridge+Radio.htm
http://www.justclickradios.co.uk/Internet-WiFi-Radio_B2VG0.aspx
There are others also.

Multicast radio streams
Internet multicast is a very efficient way to distribute live radio and TV streams compared to the way streams have been distributed up to now using 'unicast', where each listener or viewer is delivered with their own individual stream. With multicast, only one stream is sent to each ISP, and the ISP then forwards the streams to their customers. Therefore, instead of having to send tens of thousands of streams in parallel (the bandwidth required for unicast = number of users x stream bandwidth), the broadcasters only have to send one stream per channel to each ISP, therefore making an enormous percentage saving in the bandwidth required, and this allows the broadcasters to provide higher bit rate levels, so the audio quality is higher. Multicast is also expected to be used to deliver HDTV streams within the next 2-4 years. HDTV streams will typically use bit rate levels of about 10 Mbps, which is about 80-times higher than the 128 kbps bit rate levels being used at present, so the bit rates of the radio station streams should increase a lot in future as well.

Source:
http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/broadband_internet_radio.htm
 
SUPERCASTER said:
You also might consider these WiFi digital radios:
http://www.sangean.com/category.php?category_ID=12
http://www.robertsradio.co.uk/pages/wm201.html
http://www.pinnaclesys.com/PublicSite/uk/Products/Consumer+Products/Digital+Media+Adapters/Digital+Media+Player/SoundBridge+Radio.htm
http://www.justclickradios.co.uk/Internet-WiFi-Radio_B2VG0.aspx
There are others also.

Multicast radio streams
Internet multicast is a very efficient way to distribute live radio and TV streams compared to the way streams have been distributed up to now using 'unicast', where each listener or viewer is delivered with their own individual stream. With multicast, only one stream is sent to each ISP, and the ISP then forwards the streams to their customers. Therefore, instead of having to send tens of thousands of streams in parallel (the bandwidth required for unicast = number of users x stream bandwidth), the broadcasters only have to send one stream per channel to each ISP, therefore making an enormous percentage saving in the bandwidth required, and this allows the broadcasters to provide higher bit rate levels, so the audio quality is higher. Multicast is also expected to be used to deliver HDTV streams within the next 2-4 years. HDTV streams will typically use bit rate levels of about 10 Mbps, which is about 80-times higher than the 128 kbps bit rate levels being used at present, so the bit rates of the radio station streams should increase a lot in future as well.

Warning. Wind now blowing other direction. Go Soup...

SUPERCASTER said:
It seems the biggest selling point for the [...] radio is that you never need new batteries, just use a very long extension cord.

Clouseau
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom