Ha.WABC has a petition on change.org to "Save AM Radio"by requiring car manufactures to keep AM radio in their cars. It's a banner ad on their website too. wabcradio.com
Ha ha.
Hahahahaha!
Ha.WABC has a petition on change.org to "Save AM Radio"by requiring car manufactures to keep AM radio in their cars. It's a banner ad on their website too. wabcradio.com
Grant wasn't as much a demagogue as Limbaugh. He was too educated for that. Savage is so nasty it's actually funny.Don't forget WABC talk legend Bob "Get off the phone, you creep!" Grant, who was Limbaugh and Savage all rolled into one long before either of those two came to AM.
That would be yer cuzin."Which one of these is not like the others?"
Talkradio could've extended AM radio's relevance by maintaining a mixed audience, but as you say, they "purified" the programming and drove away anybody left of nuts. Now it's thoroughly predictable and boring.We started with Randy Michaels at WKRC and then "teaching the Grand Old Lady to dance" at WLW with at-times outrageous (though not all political) talk, and more talk stations at least trying for a general audience. Even Limbaugh affiliates wanted both the "We love Limbaugh" and "We hate Limbaugh" listeners. In recent years it's become "Republicans are pure and holy, Democrats are evil Socialist pedophile groomers" as a constant mantra
What's interesting was in one AM radio Facebook groups, someone posted an old KZIM Cape Girardeau billboard that said "Rush is Right" with the "right" crossed out and "not" beside it. He seemed to be angered that an affiliate would do that. Of course some of us explained that back in that day, KZIM wanted listeners from both sides of the aisle.Talkradio could've extended AM radio's relevance by maintaining a mixed audience, but as you say, they "purified" the programming and drove away anybody left of nuts. Now it's thoroughly predictable and boring.
Literally there's one guy who's entire schtick is "everybody who doesn't think exactly like me is a Communist" like we're in 1950.Talkradio could've extended AM radio's relevance by maintaining a mixed audience, but as you say, they "purified" the programming and drove away anybody left of nuts. Now it's thoroughly predictable and boring.
Most remaining talk radio listeners were born at or before 1950 so it’s a daily affirmation for them.Literally there's one guy who's entire schtick is "everybody who doesn't think exactly like me is a Communist" like we're in 1950.
A station with both sides of the issue is more interesting,less predictable, and MORE HEALTHY for the country.What's interesting was in one AM radio Facebook groups, someone posted an old KZIM Cape Girardeau billboard that said "Rush is Right" with the "right" crossed out and "not" beside it. He seemed to be angered that an affiliate would do that. Of course some of us explained that back in that day, KZIM wanted listeners from both sides of the aisle.
I've heard people say that. I don't know if I buy it. If you're playing music you play songs along the lines on one format. You don't play a CHR format and throw in some country to try and include everyone. If you play one side of the street and build a large audience of enthusiastic followers, you may lose them when you play a guy with opposite views. I don't know if airing guys from both teams will hold the talk audience. I may be wrong, but I think you need talk consistency just as you need music consistency in formats. Rush was right about one thing. The job of the broadcaster is to build the largest possible audience to hear the commercials. It is a business. Whether it is fair or not we can argue, but I don't think playing both sides of the street would have helped maintain AM's importance. I think narrowcasting probably gave it the extra years it enjoyed once FM completely took over music formats. Our friend is at the end of it's life. It's time to say a prayer and unplug the transmitters from life support.Talkradio could've extended AM radio's relevance by maintaining a mixed audience, but as you say, they "purified" the programming and drove away anybody left of nuts. Now it's thoroughly predictable and boring.
Some of them could mix in non-political subjects like men and divorce, finances, goofy subjects, not all "don't those Satanic Democrats make you sick?"A station with both sides of the issue is more interesting,less predictable, and MORE HEALTHY for the country.
Agree you have to "play the hits" and Rush knew it as well as anyone. There was a time before it was all partisan "hooray for my team" though. You probably couldn't re-create that today, though it still exists in some areas (I don't mean 4 hours liberal, 4 hours conservative but still mixing in community topics, humor, lifestyle).I've heard people say that. I don't know if I buy it. If you're playing music you play songs along the lines on one format. You don't play a CHR format and throw in some country to try and include everyone. If you play one side of the street and build a large audience of enthusiastic followers, you may lose them when you play a guy with opposite views. I don't know if airing guys from both teams will hold the talk audience. I may be wrong, but I think you need talk consistency just as you need music consistency in formats. Rush was right about one thing. The job of the broadcaster is to build the largest possible audience to hear the commercials. It is a business. Whether it is fair or not we can argue, but I don't think playing both sides of the street would have helped maintain AM's importance. I think narrowcasting probably gave it the extra years it enjoyed once FM completely took over music formats. Our friend is at the end of it's life. It's time to say a prayer and unplug the transmitters from life support.
AM had a very good life. I'll call the funeral home and get flowers.
The problem with that is that younger, and even middle-aged people, are turning to podcasts on-demand for their spoken-word programming.The only way I know to revive talk radio, and I mean this is a LONG shot, is to have 20-something hosts describing how they see the world, and even include late teens. Obviously, they would all have to be extremely prepared, and incorporate every element laid out in a previous post, focusing on community. Otherwise, the current tribal warfare wins out (or loses out). However, a relatively-new AM in our area that plays oldies is more than holding its own, ratings-wise. It does have two FM translators, however, for full disclosure.
True, and I was thinking about podcasts-I was wondering if folks that age would want their podcast on AM-IF promoted enough, there might be a flicker of hope in making an antique somehow relevant, at least for a little while. On demand is a game-changer; just consider how many of us DVR our favorite shows to watch when it’s convenient for us.The problem with that is that younger, and even middle-aged people, are turning to podcasts on-demand for their spoken-word programming.
That generation doesn't even watch live TV, I doubt they're going to rush to the car at lunchtime to catch 15 minutes of a podcastTrue, and I was thinking about podcasts-I was wondering if folks that age would want their podcast on AM-IF promoted enough, there might be a flicker of hope in making an antique somehow relevant, at least for a little while. On demand is a game-changer; just consider how many of us DVR our favorite shows to watch when it’s convenient for us.
I would hope so! Earl Pitts was supposed to be a comedy segment!I always thought the guy who played Earl Pitts was funnier than Rush
In response to your third sentence, this song recently topped the Hot 100 and receives regular airplay on CHR and if it isn't Country, I don't know what is:I've heard people say that. I don't know if I buy it. If you're playing music you play songs along the lines on one format. You don't play a CHR format and throw in some country to try and include everyone. If you play one side of the street and build a large audience of enthusiastic followers, you may lose them when you play a guy with opposite views. I don't know if airing guys from both teams will hold the talk audience. I may be wrong, but I think you need talk consistency just as you need music consistency in formats. Rush was right about one thing. The job of the broadcaster is to build the largest possible audience to hear the commercials. It is a business. Whether it is fair or not we can argue, but I don't think playing both sides of the street would have helped maintain AM's importance. I think narrowcasting probably gave it the extra years it enjoyed once FM completely took over music formats. Our friend is at the end of it's life. It's time to say a prayer and unplug the transmitters from life support.
AM had a very good life. I'll call the funeral home and get flowers.
That of course was Gary Burbank, who had a repertoire of many more charactersI always thought the guy who played Earl Pitts was funnier than Rush