I'm not sure what to tell you. Hendrie was a brilliant topical parodiest.
No, the advent of successful FM created this change. Instead of a single broad Top 40 format, we got urban leaning, AC leaning (Hot AC) and traditional Top 40 as well as Superstars Top 40 rock formats. The 15 shares a top 40 might get in the 60's became a 4 or a 5 share by the end of the 70's.And with the FM dial's CHR stations topping out at measly 5.0 shares, those geniiuses stand to be on go-fund-us sites soon.
Corporate/political garbage invited this condition. They're stuck with it.
They're still listening to pop music, just not what's on the radio. It "inspires" them to listen to media other than over-the-air radio. You (and I) may not understand that music, or may think it's garbage, but the opinions and tastes of their elders have never mattered much to any generation in its teens and twenties.Pop music for youth has to improve greatly, and inspire that young and recently apathetic demo, before any radio dial is 'saved'.
12-17's have been replenishing radio's reach for over 60 years now. Kids from sock-hops to Greasers to surfers to Brits to anti-war Vietnam protestors to disco to .... whatever ..... have kept the AM and FM dials alive. Not anymore, though.
Trying to appease all appeases none in the talk and opinion arena.A station with both sides of the issue is more interesting,less predictable, and MORE HEALTHY for the country.
Just truth, not fiction.Not everyone wants the socialist nightmare, um, dream.
Cleveland especially is a market that has and had only one good AM signal which covers the entire market around the clock, that being 1100, now WTAM. All others had structural deficiencies or were never built to accommodate suburban sprawl, so when the likes of WMMS, WDOK, WQAL and WGCL burst onto the scene, AMs like WJW, WIXY, WHK, WGAR and WERE slowly fell into irrelevance. WGAR effectively moved their call letters and legacy from the AM dial onto 99.5 in the late 1980s before selling off their once-venerable AM signal. Not even talk radio could save a deeply impaired signal like WERE, which went all-brokered in 1992.No, the advent of successful FM created this change. Instead of a single broad Top 40 format, we got urban leaning, AC leaning (Hot AC) and traditional Top 40 as well as Superstars Top 40 rock formats. The 15 shares a top 40 might get in the 60's became a 4 or a 5 share by the end of the 70's.
Markets that had only 6 to 8 good signals... New York, LA, Detroit, Chicago, Cleveland and so on... suddenly had 12 to 15 good, full FM signals plus the AMs that survived for a while so shares were spread across 20 or so stations instead of five or six.
Yes, anything other than far-right fascism is "socialism". But I suppose if you don't owe a hospital $150,000 to a hospital you aren't even an American.Not everyone wants the socialist nightmare, um, dream.
I didn't like Leno's interviews of people on the street who were so dumb I thought maybe they were putting us on just so they could get on TV. As for Imus, some of his stuff was okay. Steve Allen did funny pretend interviews. I don't think it's funny when you make fools out of your listeners/viewers, it's just mean.😊 I’ll play devil’s advocate here for a moment. How is this shtick any different than what Imus did, or Jay Leno’s interviews of stupid people on the street, or even going all the way back, when Steve Allen used to do pretend interviews with people like Foster Brooks, who played a convincing drunk guy?
Most of the audience realizes it’s a parody, right? If not, they’ll figure it out pretty quickly.
When I was 12, Eliot Field at KFWB had a pretend sidekick named Tex, and even at 12, I figured out it was a parody.
AM radio is perfectly suited for all sorts of comic bits using voices.
Not to get political but isn't that the whole point of Fox News?I didn't like Leno's interviews of people on the street who were so dumb I thought maybe they were putting us on just so they could get on TV. As for Imus, some of his stuff was okay. Steve Allen did funny pretend interviews. I don't think it's funny when you make fools out of your listeners/viewers, it's just mean.
I guess you weren’t a fan of Candid Camera.I don't think it's funny when you make fools out of your listeners/viewers, it's just mean.
Cleveland especially is a market that has and had only one good AM signal which covers the entire market around the clock...
Hendrie’s free podcast (The World of Phil Hendrie) is great, and he sometimes has old radio show clips as part of it. Also there are great mp3 segments on archive.org like these:Well, what if the callers are participants in their own ignorance? Some of Hendrie's topics were so outlandish that it's amazing people would fall for it. That's on them for having no critical thinking skills. You hear on WBEN everyday. Hendrie was a master at parody.
Rember, folks - This is "entertainment" which means that it's often not 100% unrehearsed reality. Anyone who's actually worked in the business, especially in the studio during some of the more outlandish and creative "bits" knows that magic does sometimes spontaneously happen and there are some callers who truly are as dim or eccentric as they sound on the air, but in many other cases some of the best stuff is not spontaneous, the caller is in on the bit, it's someone known to the hosts who's playing along, or in the case of stations that used (or I guess still maybe still use) a show "prep service", it's completely pre-recorded and scripted.Some of Hendrie's topics were so outlandish that it's amazing people would fall for it. That's on them for having no critical thinking skills. You hear on WBEN everyday. Hendrie was a master at parody.
And how long ago was that Rubber Duck?I will say REACT on channel 9 bailed me out of car breakdowns a few times
So far, nobody has found a profitable way of streaming advertising sponsored music programming. "Moving" and AM to FM, even a low power one, can be very profitable... particularly in geographically small and medium markets. Streaming costs more than it can produce, so there is no profitable way to move the "one for many" free to the user model to streams.If radio companies spent less time trying to buy translators, and constantly de-emphasize AM radio, we wouldn’t be where we are today. Companies spent so much money on FM sticks that offered no guarantee of higher listenership. Instead they should’ve invested more into mobile radio streaming and trying to profit from that. I still can’t believe the major radio groups haven’t profited from streams, when my company did it 10 years ago
But Loverofradio says his company has been doing so for 10 years. I can only assume it is with programming that uses absolutely no music, not even as bumpers or beds. Otherwise... COULD ... YOU ... BE ... WRONG!?!?!?So far, nobody has found a profitable way of streaming advertising sponsored music programming. "Moving" and AM to FM, even a low power one, can be very profitable... particularly in geographically small and medium markets. Streaming costs more than it can produce, so there is no profitable way to move the "one for many" free to the user model to streams.