radio_radio said:
Lafayette Unplugged said:
Obviously even 10 years ago, radio was a PERSONALITY-driven business and not a SALES-driven business.
Now it's 80-90% sales and 10-20% air talent (if they bother to get around to on-air content that's live, interesting, or compelling).
Most jocks really really really STINK now, but it's okay because the sales dept. is so ruthless and relentless to build revenue.
Maybe in one horse markets like Lafayette radio was a personality driven business, but every place I have ever worked...it was always a sales driven business. And yes, I am one of the most relentless revenue seeking missles you have ever met. I was also pretty good on the air.
You (accidentally) hit the nail on the head. It's Lafayette and nobody from OUT OF TOWN will ever figure it out. Relying on consultants and "how well the big markets do" is what kills/killed Lafayette radio. It's all copycat, counter-programming and grasping for straws now and whatever format the "fancy big city" satellite companies and consultants advise the owners to use. If ALLLLL of this wonderful research and format-a-go-go was worth the investment, wouldn't SOMEBODY have figured out a way to knock WKOA off the top after ALLLLL this time? They either don't want to take the risk or roll up their sleeves, or they are happy to let WKOA win by default and not figure out that country works in this market with veteran trusted personalities and TRY TO DO SOMETHING SIMILAR. Would WAZY become a 50K Watt hot-country blow torch that carries all the Purdue games, court some of the WKOA people away with more money and bury WKOA once and for all? Probably not because it's (sniff) too hard and would cost (sniff) too much money.
[/quote]
As for ratings, it's a shame Shurz let 1450 deteriorate as a simulcast of their oldies station. If you look at similar "graveyard" frequency stations like WDWS and WJBL in Champaign and Bloomington, IL respectively (University towns with healthy economies) those stations have double digit 12+ ratings...which equates to top 1,2 or 3 in 25-54 and 35-54. They also have revenue well in excess of $1MM on their AM stations.
So your "It's the AM for cryin' out loud!!! I'm sure all 6 of their listeners will enjoy the local content." comment shows alot of your ignorance.
[/quote]
Well, at least you're not making it personal. But there's that "Hey, AM's are big elsewhere!" mentality. This isn't elsewhere, Mr. Good in Sales
and On the Air, it's Lafayette! Nobody seems to want to figure that out or accept it, I guess. At least not the owners and some of the programmers.
[/quote]
Thank goodness someone at Shurz is bright enough to rescue the station from certain death with a dedicated sales staff as opposed to a bunch of lazy transactional FM sellers trying it in combo.
[/quote]
A day (actually a year) late and a dollar short on FINALLY switching WASK-AM to "something" versus "nothing" (simulcasting), but I wish them luck. I bet those other AM's actually PROMOTE their product, right? Another "unique" quality of Lafayette radio: Other than WGLM, when's the last time you saw heavy market coverage of billboards, newspaper/magazine ads, and television/cable ads? Yeah, that's what I thought. How hard and how much budget would it take to promote ESPN radio on, saaaaaaay, ESPN on Comcast Cable!!!!? "We'd rather have people just FIND us and then we'll build on that". WHAAAT???
[/quote]
Now onto your ratings comment....last I checked WKOA, WTHI, WWKI, and WASK-FM had pretty decent ratings. I think I saw where WTHI had a bunch of 30 shares again in many demos....Terre Haute has more radio stations than gas stations.
[/quote]
Terre Haute, Terre Haute, blah blah blah other markets blah blah blah. When did I say WKOA-
FM and WASK_
FM DIDN'T have good ratings???
WTHI and WWKI aren't in the Lafayette market and don't even show up to be considered serious players in the Arbitrons (much like WASK-AM because not many are writing down in their diaries that they listen to AM radio in Lafayette ALTHOUGH I'm sure it's ignorant to suggest THAT, right?
Arbitron is totally wrong, I'm totally wrong, and your non-ignorant data from other bigger markets is what we should probably go with) .
Lafayette Unplugged said:
Everyone's waxing poetically about how big their ratings were and how jocks were making $60K. That's before they had any type of competition from another radio station OR MP3's, satellite radio, computers, etc.
When you're the only (no talent) game in town, you're going to have the highest ratings. It's called "winning by default". It's like when they say WLFI is the best local station. No kidding???
I hate to wax poetically, but do you really have any idea what you are talking about?
[/quote]
You can get on here and speculate but I can't? Thanks, Fidel. We all come on here to comment on something we have an informed opinion about and then disappear for awhile when people get too personal about their comments and just want to go after someone and say "you're ignorant" (So next I call you a poo-poo head and then we exchange another 2 or 3 posts before they tell us to go stand in the corner and take a time out).
The fact that I'm talking about Lafayette radio and you've got some lovely entertaining numbers to back up Terre Haute, Kokomo, and Timbuk 3 makes me wonder why you didn't just read and then keep scrolling down to something that applied to what I was writing about?
After you add Lafayette to your growing list of "all the places you've worked" come back with something we can use . Your speculation about AM radio in other markets compared to what I actually KNOW about the Lafayette market don't match and you go off on ME for being ignorant?
Agree or disagree but please don't make your posts accusatory.