Re: WAWZ, a New Jersey station
>
> Metropolitan areas are defined as contiguous locations
> that share common interests, be they economic, demographic,
> or political.
Actually, the Bureau of Managment & Budget defines Metropolitan Statistica Areas and Consolidated Metropolitan statistical Areas. The keyword is "Budget." The definition is purely economic, and takes into account commute patterns, distribution of goods and services, and many other items related to economic activity.
The criteria has nothing to do with local politics, and the demographic data is a result of the market definition, not a cause.
> While New York City borders such places as
> Bayonne, Elizabeth, Jersey City, Union City, etc. it
> shares little in common with them other than the weather.
It is, economically, part of the NY metro.
>
> The federal government defines metropolitan areas and
> recognizes several in the region, including the Newark
> Metropolitan Area.
Just as San Jose is a separate metro, but embedded in the NY metro.
> The criteria for such determinations
> are the ties that bind urban and suburban areas together.
No, they are not. What binds a metro together is purely economic. Trade, commuting, etc.
> Certainly, the counties in New Jersey do not share a
> common political interest with New York City.
Which is why polital distinction are not part of the metro definition.
> The vast
> majority of people in northern New Jersey work in other
> locations in New Jersey, not New York. Shopping and
> other aspects of the economy also are not shared.
That is just wrong. How many Manhattan companies have warehousing, branches and offices in NJ, Westchester, Long Island and even out to Bridgeport? They are all interlaced. The local economies support the regional economy.
> The issue of the radio or TV market is another thing. It
> has to do with the way the FCC has allocated broadcast
> services.
No, it has to do with how people listen to radio or watch TV. Aribtron often has separate radio MSAs based on listening patterns that are bigger, smaller or different fromt he BMB definition.
> Frankly, for many decades there was just one..just
>
> one...television assignment in all of New Jersey. That was
> Channel 13, which, as we know, was effectively taken away
> from the state in the 1960s. The distribution of those TV
> allocations in the 1940s was anything but fair and
> equitable,
> but the FCC has long been able to rule without supervision
> by Congress.
The allocations in the 40's had to do with existing population and were fair at the time.
> The broadcast tail wags the FCC dog to this
> day. The media interests in New York City will not allow
> any competition for the viewers and audience in northern
> New Jersey and the FCC has long been willing to comply
> with their requests.
Wrong. There is no way of shoehorning in more FMs and TVs. The band is already overcongested. What happened in the 40's can not be changed.
>
> As an aside, it's interesting to consider the bogus
> phrase "Tri-State Area," that is so often used by
> the New York media. New Jersey and Connecticut have
> little connection with each other. Indeed, they are
> considered to be in different parts of the country
> (Mid-Atlantic and New England).
Economically, they are what used to be called a "trade area" and are interlocked like no other area in the US.