And?![]()
Distinguished Visiting Research Fellow
Ambassador Susan E. Rice served President Barack Obama as National Security Advisor and U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations. In her role as National Secu...www.american.edu
And?![]()
Distinguished Visiting Research Fellow
Ambassador Susan E. Rice served President Barack Obama as National Security Advisor and U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations. In her role as National Secu...www.american.edu
It does nothing of the sort, but if it comforts you, have at it.This story basically confirms my view
And?
Looks like Ellison wants to keep CNN’s status quo as it is…
![]()
David Ellison Vows CNN Will Operate Independently as Paramount Buys Warner Bros.: ‘We Want to Be in the Truth Business’
Paramount Skydance's David Ellison maintained that CNN will remain an editorially independent news organization after his company closes its deal for Warner Bros. Discovery.variety.com
"...editorial independence will absolutely be maintained. It’s maintained at CBS."
Sure. How she trotted out outright lies about the Libya tragedy to the media while NS Advisor, the obvious incompetent execution of foreign policy in general during that same time, the rise of ISIS and their taking of territory is a key example. The complete ineptness of multiple domestic policy initatives while she served as Domestic Policy Advisor in the Biden Administration.That doesn't read like a bad reputation, but rather a very accomplished woman. Got something to counter it---ideally something that people of all political views might find damaging to a reputation?
Sure. How she trotted out outright lies about the Libya tragedy to the media while NS Advisor,
the obvious incompetent execution of foreign policy in general during that same time, the rise of ISIS and their taking of territory is a key example.
The complete ineptness of multiple domestic policy initatives while she served as Domestic Policy Advisor in the Biden Administration.
Even The Atlantic, hardly a right wing source, had to note her utter failures.
DR: ...right now, under President Obama and Susan Rice, we are in the midst of a particularly dysfunctional period for the NSC.
JG: So this is really about Obama, in your mind?
DR: If Obama had any material management or foreign-policy experience prior to coming in to office or if he had the character of our stronger leaders on these issues—notably a more strategic than tactical orientation, more trust in his team, less risk aversion, etc.—she would be better off, as would we all. But his flaws are compounded by a system that lets him pick and empower those around him. So, if he chooses to surround himself with a small team of "true believers" who won't challenge him as all leaders need to be challenged, if he picks campaign staffers that maintain campaign mode, if he over-empowers political advisors at the expense of those with national-security experience, that takes his weaknesses and multiplies them by those of the team around him.
And whatever Susan Rice's many strengths are, she is ill-suited for the job she has.
Rice, it must be said, was cheated out of a job for which she was well-qualified by a broken political system in Washington. She became a pawn in the campaign battle between the president she has ably served at the U.N. for the past four years and Republicans who sought to make her a scapegoat for the tragic mess that took place in Benghazi on September 11.
She did nothing wrong except to do what an administration spokesperson is supposed to do, present the unclassified facts of the case as they were known and as her colleagues in the White House, intelligence and diplomatic communities concluded they ought to be presented.
Sen. John McCain led the effort to block her possible nomination as secretary of state with the assistance of colleagues like Sens. Lindsey Graham and Kelly Ayotte. The fact that this forced Rice to submit a letter to the president withdrawing her nomination reflects the amount of power our system gives even one or two senators who are intent on blocking or dragging out a nomination.
It may be a testimony to McCain’s influence and his tenacity. It will certainly not be seen as a high water mark in his distinguished career. His opposition was petty, partisan, disproportionate to the facts of the Benghazi case that he used to frame his opposition, and inconsistent with the spirit that should prevail when a president presents or even floats his choice for a job as one of his top advisers.
Sure. How she trotted out outright lies about the Libya tragedy to the media
That all depends on whether you believe this essential pull-quote from the Ellison interview:
www.dailykos.com
Its more than that now given that the Ellisons are letting Bari Weiss run the news coverage while the war in Iran takes place.And, as Daily Kos notes in an editorial, Ellison's past actions belie his words.
![]()
How CBS’ owner is trying to gaslight America
David Ellison, chair and CEO of CBS’ parent company Paramount Skydance, is as delusional as ever. During an interview Thursday, Ellison said that he’s in the…www.dailykos.com
Newsroom critics are reportedly unhappy with CBS News’s handling of the Iran war so far, accusing recently installed editor-in-chief Bari Weiss of carrying out a “propaganda-palooza” on behalf of the Trump administration’s military campaign.
Insiders told the news site Zeteo they’ve been concerned over multiple instances, including Weiss tweeting a fire emoji above a segment where a guest slammed leftist New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani for criticizing the war.
Another source told the site that a recent summary of U.S.-Iran relations from CBS News anchor Tony Dokoupil, which neglected to mention the 1953 U.S.-backed coup in the country, was the “craziest s*** I’ve ever seen.”
Sadly, it seems like we have about a quarter of our population who does think it is "strident or inflammatory" to suggest such a thing -- or, to the point, they are deeply offended by the idea that the law is anything other than whatever the Trump administration says it is at the moment.Suggesting the law will be upheld isn't strident or inflammatory and exercising her right to free speech isn't an awful decision or horrible judgement. And no government that isn't engaging in bribery or extortion should find her comments concerning in any way.
For the time being. Likely not for too much longer.Regardless, she remains a director at Netflix
For the time being. Likely not for too much longer.
It's an analysis of what is likely to occur, not a wish one way or the other.Why would you wish bad things for people?
When a Director exhibits such poor judgement, the Board has no choice but to consider that.
It's an analysis of what is likely to occur, not a wish one way or the other.
When a Director exhibits such poor judgement, the Board has no choice but to consider that. Her personal views or politics matter not to me. Were I a Netflix shareholder and/or Board member, I would be very concerned about her clear inability to consider her activity in the midst of a strategic merger that requires Government approval.
“You know, companies already are starting to hear they better preserve their documents. They better be ready for subpoenas. If they’ve done something wrong, they’ll be held accountable, and if they haven’t broken the law, good for them,” Rice said.
"The Clinton dealings" is more than a little vague. Wanna do specifics?Dead silence on the Clinton dealings....