Maybe the folks at Entercom/Buffalo would have found this bit of research helpful before embarking on their new "alternative" format:
Why would they consider a study about non-commercial radio?
Maybe the folks at Entercom/Buffalo would have found this bit of research helpful before embarking on their new "alternative" format:
Maybe the folks at Entercom/Buffalo would have found this bit of research helpful before embarking on their new "alternative" format:
Admittedly, I haven't checked the start date on the next book, but what's the rush? And this does seem rushed.
God only knows why they paid so much for a stick that will never get them more than a 2 share doing anything, ever.
That $10.5 million figure bought more than just the Sabres rights, which might well have ended up on WGR anyway for lack of other plausible options once WNSA was gone. It also was the result of a bidding war against Citadel, which at the time was thought likely to try to go up against one of Entercom's cash-cow FMs, Kiss and Star. Outbidding Citadel (back when the market was at its peak and $10.5 million didn't seem quite so outlandish) not only got the Sabres in house, it also protected Kiss and Star.
Too bad those big, fancy companies didn't bother to buy a plane ticket to Buffalo and rent a car to drive around in for a few days. Maybe they would've realized how crappy the signal truly is---no matter what format you decide on. Perhaps the bidding war would've been less dramatic and costly.
Considering the amount of listening that happens in cars these days, and on interstates and major highways during drive times, any signal that covers those areas has value. .
Although I can see some of the reasoning behind the move, this is an example of short term decision making, unless Entercom wants to get out of the AM news-talk business in five years. Flank the Edge? All the Edge has to do is make some modest adjustments, like stop playing AC/DC and Zeppelin. What's to say this format doesn't draw listeners away from Entercom's highly successful $tar 102.5? They could have stuck with news-talk, transferred the heritage of the AM brand to FM and evolved, but instead chose to go with a format that "worked in Portland." Sure. Buffalo and Portland have lots in common. Maybe Portland MAINE. Another two year format in the making, if it lasts that long.107.7 has put up some pretty good numbers in its history. I'm still not convinced that Entercom is using it to its best advantage, but it could earn its keep, even at its inflated price, if it was programmed properly. To me, this is a "ho-hum" move, but it's better than an error.
They could have stuck with news-talk, transferred the heritage of the AM brand to FM and evolved, but instead chose to go with a format that "worked in Portland."
So just coast til the fuel and momentum runs out. That may be five years.
In car represents about 32%-33% of all listening.
BTW, haven't you guys heard about the "AM Revival"? It was big news at NAB/RAB. The FCC wants it to happen. That means it's a sure thing, right?
ETM shareholders should be very concerned if that's the prevailing attitude within the company. Just accepting a more rapid depreciation of a valuable asset is worrisome and demonstrates poor long term business sense.
Heh. Most stations these days only program for 32%-33% of the day - drive times. 7P-6A is considered throwaway. Mid-days gets automated because it's not considered to be as important as morning and afternoon drive.
It's still a viable signal. History in the area has shown that. Sales people and, more importantly, buyers here know that. It will never be a major player, but it can work for those seeking an alternative to standard commercial fare.