Though this post was about a revival oldies show on 101.1 FM, I will take your bait.
I do not doubt that the system you mention is workable, feasible and potentially profitable. The problem is that no one in the public knows what it is or recognizes AM stereo as being any more feasible than picture telephones (which are also there but not used). You can have a wonderful system or product, but if no one buys it, it is not an economic success. I hope that great things happen with AM stereo and that the providers of it, make a lot of money with it. I am totally a Capitalist.
> > AM-Stereo is not a failure. The stations that fail to
> > recognise and promote it, are. AM-Stereo is alive and well
>
> > on WWKB in Buffalo WREF in Ridgefield, CT, and WICC in
> > Bridgeport, CT., and they all sound great. C-QUAM capable
> > radios are easy to come by, I own three of them. I tried
> to
> > make this argument on another New York radio board we all
> > know. I was shot down mercilessly. Fools.
> >
> > NO IBOC!!! I repeat: NO IBOC!!!!! (now if someone would
> > actually listen to reason....)
>
> Which one sounds better marketing-wise; Stereo or Digital?
> That's why this is done for. I'm a tad sad we didn't use
> the other worldwide standards, but it's too late now.
>
<P ID="signature">______________
[email protected]</P>