Scheld says he will help with the transition and be out by the end of the year.
He points to a new SAG-AFTRA agreement behind the combining of resources.
He points to a new SAG-AFTRA agreement behind the combining of resources.
Interesting..And his comments in that article certainly aren't written like the usual "I'm getting tossed out, but to save face I'm going to tell you all here that I'm just departing in order to spend more time with my family" BS that usually comes if someone is leaving a company in an unhappy way. He seems upbeat, supportive of the transition and even mentioned that he was involved with helping to think it through. The longer-term question, of course, is what does it look like after the "combining of resources" which normally always comes with a reduction in staff as they combine multiple agencies and resources into 1.Scheld says he will help with the transition and be out by the end of the year.
He points to a new SAG-AFTRA agreement behind the combining of resources.
“Thanks to our new agreement with SAG-AFTRA, our company is about to roll out a forward looking and positive strategy to combine the resources and power of the two best radio news brands in America. It is a plan I have endorsed and frankly helped design. That new strategy is my opening to step away from a job I have loved for the past 19 years.”
And 880? Another sports betting blowtorch?IMO the ultimate end product will be news/talk on 1010 and simulcast on 92.3. When that happens, we don’t know, but it seems to be the most likely outcome scenario.
1010 was designed to be the Manhattan focused news station, while WCBS covered Jersey, Long Island and upstate. WINS is very directional and not the better of the two signals. But it dumps far more power over Manhattan and the Boroughs because of its pattern.IMO the ultimate end product will be news/talk on 1010 and simulcast on 92.3. When that happens, we don’t know, but it seems to be the most likely outcome scenario.
And 880? Another sports betting blowtorch?
1010 was designed to be the Manhattan focused news station, while WCBS covered Jersey, Long Island and upstate. WINS is very directional and not the better of the two signals. But it dumps far more power over Manhattan and the Boroughs because of its pattern.
I think these AM transmissions will be long gone by 2037.Thinking long term, I think that WCBS will be the one to go. WCBS is successful partly because of the CBS brand that is associated with its current call sign. Once the station gives up the WCBS call sign in 2037, would a new brand or a new call sign catch on? On the other hand, 1010 WINS is a well-established brand that Audacy (or its successor) will be able to use well beyond 2037. It would be interesting to see what would be the elements of WCBS that 1010 WINS would adopt.
Thinking long term, I think that WCBS will be the one to go.
It would be interesting to see what would be the elements of WCBS that 1010 WINS would adopt.
I guess there’s nothing to rule out 880 being the one that would eventually get an FM, but WINS seems to generally be the stronger brand and station despite the signal.1010 was designed to be the Manhattan focused news station, while WCBS covered Jersey, Long Island and upstate. WINS is very directional and not the better of the two signals. But it dumps far more power over Manhattan and the Boroughs because of its pattern.
WCBS 880 has had baseball for 20 years. They had the Yankees first. Then in 2014 WCBS and WFAN essentially flipped baseball teams, as the Yankees went to WFAN and the Mets came to WCBS.Format-wise, WCBS has already shifted away from all-news to news with the Mets. WCBS is also the lower rated of the two.
Mets spent a few years at WOR between their 'FAN and 'CBS stints.WCBS 880 has had baseball for 20 years. They had the Yankees first. Then in 2014 WCBS and WFAN essentially flipped baseball teams, as the Yankees went to WFAN and the Mets came to WCBS.
I guess I'm a bit skeptical that a decision 20 years ago reflects a shift relevant to combining the news resources of two all-news stations in the same market.
I guess I'm a bit skeptical that a decision 20 years ago reflects a shift relevant to combining the news resources of two all-news stations in the same market.
No way!!! I don't want to lose another alternative station!!! We already lost 101.9 WRXP 10 years ago to the WFAN simulcast!!!!IMO the ultimate end product will be news/talk on 1010 and simulcast on 92.3. When that happens, we don’t know, but it seems to be the most likely outcome scenario.
It is probably because of WCBS' stronger signal due to its lower frequency.However, there had to be a reason why they put baseball on 880 and not 1010.
News/talk and not just news? You predict there will be no all news radio station in NYC?IMO the ultimate end product will be news/talk on 1010 and simulcast on 92.3. When that happens, we don’t know, but it seems to be the most likely outcome scenario.
Every once in a while I can pick up 1010 in NE Ohio. Signal usually pretty faint but I can hear it. Think it'd be CFRB out of Toronto seeing as how it's closer to me but the nighttime signal shows even the distant fringe ends just about the PA/OH border and the nighttime signal for WINS barely covers 1/2 of NJ. Both WINS & CFRB have 50,000 watts although CFRB is supposed to be the "clear channel" freq.1010 was designed to be the Manhattan focused news station, while WCBS covered Jersey, Long Island and upstate. WINS is very directional and not the better of the two signals. But it dumps far more power over Manhattan and the Boroughs because of its pattern.
Well, the New York metro area already has five news/talk stations, so 1010 WINS won't become that. In my many years of living in NYC, I don't remember 1010 WINS ever airing anything other than news. Therefore, I would be shocked if 1010 WINS were chosen to provide live play-by-play coverage of a sports team.IMO the ultimate end product will be news/talk on 1010 and simulcast on 92.3. When that happens, we don’t know, but it seems to be the most likely outcome scenario.