Link to it here-
http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2008/04/it_started_a_ye.php
While I think he's cutting the initial popularity of AC/DC short, it stands to reason.
When I first fell in love with WDVE in the late 80s, they played what was contemporary alongside Uriah Heep. If you could put Motley Crue beside "Easy Livin'" then, you can put "Home Sweet Home" beside Neil Young now.
Though why anyone would want to listen to Neil Young in the first place is another story. I'll give you "Downtown," but most of his stuff, in addition to being slow and difficult to listen to, is so dated you can't help but feel 60 when you hear it.
There's no more segregation. Troops aren't shooting students at Kent State. We've progressed as a society, but, if you're WDVE, not as a playlist.
By the way, to all you Baby Boomers out there- remember there's a big difference between BEING 60 and FEELING 60.
Which Mick Jagger, Brian Johnson, and Lemmy Kilmister all certainly do NOT feel.
Anyway, I'm off the subject. Point is maybe if they would embrace the decade instead of doing GOD KNOWS WHAT with Hair Band Idol and "Mullet Talk," the station might be listenable.
And don't give me that "they are still No. 1." If the Steelers go 4-12 next season they will still be the No. 1 team in town. Doesn't mean the product can't be improved.
On this thread and elsewhere, everyone jokes about how stagnant the station is. Mark Madden recently mentioned on his show that WDVE's playlist hadn't changed since 1982.
It is akin to listening to what people said about KDKA before they fell out of the top spot.
This isn't what Pittsburgh wants. This is what Pittsburgh gets because there is no rock competition in town.
I implore WDVE to start looking at what is going on nationally. We love you man! WDVE used to be one of the most cutting edge stations in the country (and the ratings were higher, too).
Be that again.
http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2008/04/it_started_a_ye.php
While I think he's cutting the initial popularity of AC/DC short, it stands to reason.
When I first fell in love with WDVE in the late 80s, they played what was contemporary alongside Uriah Heep. If you could put Motley Crue beside "Easy Livin'" then, you can put "Home Sweet Home" beside Neil Young now.
Though why anyone would want to listen to Neil Young in the first place is another story. I'll give you "Downtown," but most of his stuff, in addition to being slow and difficult to listen to, is so dated you can't help but feel 60 when you hear it.
There's no more segregation. Troops aren't shooting students at Kent State. We've progressed as a society, but, if you're WDVE, not as a playlist.
By the way, to all you Baby Boomers out there- remember there's a big difference between BEING 60 and FEELING 60.
Which Mick Jagger, Brian Johnson, and Lemmy Kilmister all certainly do NOT feel.
Anyway, I'm off the subject. Point is maybe if they would embrace the decade instead of doing GOD KNOWS WHAT with Hair Band Idol and "Mullet Talk," the station might be listenable.
And don't give me that "they are still No. 1." If the Steelers go 4-12 next season they will still be the No. 1 team in town. Doesn't mean the product can't be improved.
On this thread and elsewhere, everyone jokes about how stagnant the station is. Mark Madden recently mentioned on his show that WDVE's playlist hadn't changed since 1982.
It is akin to listening to what people said about KDKA before they fell out of the top spot.
This isn't what Pittsburgh wants. This is what Pittsburgh gets because there is no rock competition in town.
I implore WDVE to start looking at what is going on nationally. We love you man! WDVE used to be one of the most cutting edge stations in the country (and the ratings were higher, too).
Be that again.