• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Wease and Lonsberry

This may be one of the things that radio should do to re-energize itself and re-connect with (potential) listeners. One of the radio stations in Erie has a (nearly) storefront studio. You can walk by or stand outside it for hours on end and you won't see a live body, only the lights of a computer screen connected to a 500 gig computer spewing out the hits and voicetracks. Better to have a live body working in that studio (although, a body in a coffin, an apt commentary on the state of the business these days, might get attention.) Some will argue that radio is boring, "Aside from the morning show, what's there to see but a not-so-attractive DJ wearing jeans and a station hoody re-arranging audio files and surfing the net?" And yes, it can be argued that Main street studios only bring out the freaks 'n creeps, stalkers and nut-jobs. Still, NBC-TV and Fox-TV have storefront studios and they make them work quite well. Sure, these days most radio stations are in commercial malls or industrial parks and Main street (Buffalo) is a boarded up ghost town with a train running down the center of the street. But perhaps radio needs to return to storefront studios, rather than doing tiresome remotes that few listeners care about, much less listen to. Performing in a fishbowl would take some getting used to, but in this You Tube, WebCam, MySace, FaceBook, blogosphere "hey everybody, look at me, look at me" world, radio might benefit by stepping away from the Wall Street jungle and spending more time in Main street store front studios. In a serious note, it would be wise to make sure the glass is bullet-proof. Nothing to joke about there.
 
I can't decide which phrase is more apt:

1. "Cage Match"

2. "Giant Mud Pit"

3. "Sound and Fury"

4. "Some times you feel like a nut, some times you don't"
 
I have to concur with E9. Storefront studios actually used by live hosts would be a step in the right direction for building connections with the public. Main Street may or may not be the best location. How about a studio in a mall or a busy shopping plaza?
 
Where I work, our on-air studios are visible to the public. We are located in a suburban area on a street corner. Even though our studios are on the second floor they are low enough for people to see while they drive by. On those rare occasions when our shows are voicetracked the PD insists the shades be drawn. Also, if you're working in that kind of environment it's best not to pick your nose! BTW, I ran into a listener over the weekend who told me he drives his bus by there everyday and shoots a wave.
 
What a joke this studio is....conceptualized and built by a dating line company? Yeah that sounds very classy. I hope they remember to put sound-proof and bullet-proof and damage-proof glass on the wall to the outside. I can see it now....some downtown nut job decides he hates Lonesberry and starts taunting him and kicking the window an flipping him off. It will happen...trust me...there are a lot of nut-jobs out there that are violent. I can also put money on the fact that someone damages the window overnight and creates a big star crack in it.

They said they wanted to create a NBC feel....WHAM ain't no Today show. At least the big boys in NYC have taken precautions like security guards/police presence and heavy bullet-proof glass and roped off steel fences to keeps the nutties back.

One more thing...now I know where Newsman Bill's salary went to. I would gladly taken him back over this dumb idea any day. Another stupid "hot-trend" idea from clearchannel over-mgmt.
 
ExPhotog said:
Now I know where Newsman Bill's salary went to. I would gladly taken him back over this dumb idea any day. Another stupid "hot-trend" idea from clearchannel over-mgmt.
Isn't it sad that someone like Bill Lowe had to lose his job just so that Sleaze and Looneytoonesberry can have a nice new studio?
And I agree that the studio windows better be reinforced with heavy-duty glass. Just wait until the weather gets warmer and the downtown "slugs" start roaming the streets begging for drugs. Want to bet that the Rochester Police will have to station officers outside this studio just to protect these two?
Another waste of taxpayer dollars.
 
Those of us who are in radio and on the air, know one sad truth...It's often better to have listeners create their own mental image of us, than for them to know the reality of the face that accompanies the voice.

Knowing the truth is often very disappointing. :(
 
From a photo caption: "Lonsberry and Brother Wease will sometimes do their shows from the studio."

"Sometimes" is a proportion between 0 and 100%. Any over/under on the actual percent of use vs. potential use in the next 3, 6, 12 months? I predict a generally downward sloping line.

Meanwhile, I thought the D&C piece was pretty snarky, even for them.
 
You look at a station's website and you'll find pictures of on-air talent. This is true for most stations.
 
qman said:
You look at a station's website and you'll find pictures of on-air talent. This is true for most stations.

You've never heard of Photoshop, glamor shots, and scanning that resume picture from the last millennium?
 
I think that both Wease and Lonsberry would say that if you don't like their shows....then don't listen.

But, IMHO, these personal attacks just go away over the line.

As for the D&C coverage; I can remember when the newspaper never printed word one about the electronic media in Rochester. At least now the paper acknowledges there are people who work on radio and television.

MG
 
Take a page from "professional sports" - if you don't like the way you look on the radio, stick a syringe full of HGH in your keister daily for a few weeks- poof! "All Ready For Showcase Studios!" And "certain parties" might also get "a more resonant voice" as a side benefit!

BTW - I'm no fan of corporate radio or their heartless, and unnecessary, personnel cuts. But how do you draw a cause-and-effect relationship between the firing of Bill Lowe and the construction of some remote studio?

Especially since, if I understand it correctly, the studio was built by a subscription date-rape company, not Clear Channel.

Just wondering.... ??? :p
 
Savage said:
But how do you draw a cause-and-effect relationship between the firing of Bill Lowe and the construction of some remote studio?
Especially since, if I understand it correctly, the studio was built by a subscription date-rape company, not Clear Channel.

The line can be drawn, as you mentioned, is that the studio is not being built by Clear Channel but by another company. Thus Clear Channel can claim they didn't spend a dime on this project. ::)
 
Ummm...you lost me.

I thought what you were suggesting was, that Clear Channel used the money they saved by axing Bill Lowe to build the new Wease vs. Lonsberry Radio Professional Wrestling Studio.

Or did I read your original post INcorrectly?? ???

I ain't much fer fancy book-learnin' but thought over here in the remedial-reading row, that's what you meant.
 
Savage said:
Ummm...you lost me.

I thought what you were suggesting was, that Clear Channel used the money they saved by axing Bill Lowe to build the new Wease vs. Lonsberry Radio Professional Wrestling Studio.

Or did I read your original post INcorrectly?? ???

I ain't much fer fancy book-learnin' but thought over here in the remedial-reading row, that's what you meant.

I wanted to find out who was truly paying attention to what I wrote and you were the only one that caught on.
I do think that it's shame Mr. Lowe and others were recently fired from Clear Channel on the basis of budget cuts, yet the company has the money to build a new studio for two of their "stars."
I was being sarcastic when I stated that Clear Channel can say they didn't build the studios, but that another company did. CC might not have built the studios, but they paid to have them built. Good catch! ;)
 
Just FYI the studio is located where the old Atlanta Bread company Express used to be on Main street. I wonder if the place smells like pumpernickel and soup??
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom