• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Well that didn't take very long...

According to the Wall Street Journal...

Roth to Exit CBS Morning Radio

NEW YORK -- In a sign of the struggles some broadcast-radio stations face in the absence of Howard Stern's popular morning show, Mr. Stern's successor in New York and other markets will leave CBS Corp.'s airwaves, to be replaced by the duo Opie & Anthony, according to people familiar with the matter.

The duo would replace David Lee Roth, the former rock star who has failed to attract a big audience in the months since Mr. Stern left CBS for Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. The multiyear deal for Opie & Anthony, still in final stages of negotiation, would be a coup for XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc., which currently broadcasts the duo's show. Gregg "Opie" Hughes and Anthony Cumia would continue to air on XM, and they would promote XM on air to CBS's listeners in cities where Mr. Roth's show airs.
 
It really should come as no surprise that David Lee Roth’s brief career in radio came to a screeching halt. Mr. Roth’s background is a musician, not a radio personality, where as Opie and Anthony have been in broadcasting for a number of years and have a proven track record. Even critics of Howard Stern have to admit that Stern was a tough act to follow, no matter who was selected to replace him. And that appears to be the bigger problem for those terrestrial radio stations that used to carry Stern’s show. Depending on the market, there are a number of stations carrying different morning hosts. So far, here in Rochester, “The Rover” on the “Nerve” hasn’t made much of an impression, at least according to the ratings I’ve seen and people that I’ve spoken with. Perhaps the CBS stations in Rochester should consider hiring local talent for their early morning show. But then they risk eroding Wease’s numbers, which is something Infinity managers do not want to happen.
 
CBS Capitulates

Here's the take from Inside Radio, Thursday, April 20th
<blockquote>
Signs are that Opie & Anthony make a triumphant
return to CBS.

And won't Howard Stern be frosted? O & A always wanted to battle him head-to-head are apparently going to wind up with his old shift on a number of key CBS stations. The New York Post, Philadelphia Inquirer and Wall Street Journal all pick up the scent - with the Journal suggesting that O&A would be allowed to promote XM on their new CBS affiliates.</blockquote>

About time they sent Diamond Dave and his Gargantuan ego packing.

I view this as CBS finally coming to its senses. I'm no fan of some of Opie & Anthony's stunts, but they're entertaining; in many ways, more than Howard. Their St. Patrick's Cathedral episode, for which they ultimately got canned, was inexcusable. Maybe they got a dose of reality from that experience. The question is, how will their "anything goes" XM show be modified to accomodate their presence on terrestrial radio?

This appears to be a cunning, if not altogether smart move by CBS, which turns their Free FM ship around AND sticks it to Howard and Sirius. Corporate warfare can be entertaining at times.

I may just borrow my friend's Sirius receiver to hear Howard whine about how he's getting screwed. Talk about gargantuan egos.

Heaven knows I would PAY to hear him.

-9-
 
> It really should come as no surprise that David Lee Roth’s
> brief career in radio came to a screeching halt. Mr. Roth’s
> background is a musician, not a radio personality, where as
> Opie and Anthony have been in broadcasting for a number of
> years and have a proven track record.

This is further proof that someone who's a good guest on a show (as Roth usually was) doesn't always make a great host. A host is someone who knows when to step in and make his own personality front and center, and when to step back and draw out either his teammates on the show (if he has them) or his guests, or his callers if it's a listener participation show. A host also knows how to use all the elements to bring focus to the show and move it forward, making it easy for the listener to join in and follow along.

It takes time, and/or training, to figure all that out. It's a specialized skill. It doesn't come naturally, even to people who are bright and articulate in other venues (such as actors, musicians and politicians). It wasn't fair to Roth to plunge him into that without at least giving him some coaching and letting him get his feet wet with some weekend and/or guest-hosting appearances. He might have eventually become a really good performer on the air--he has a lot of the personality and smarts, just needs to establish a sense of how to control and direct a show like Howard used to do so well. But now, he's probably been burned by it, and most likely won't try again even if someone asks him.

> Even critics of Howard
> Stern have to admit that Stern was a tough act to follow, no
> matter who was selected to replace him. And that appears to
> be the bigger problem for those terrestrial radio stations
> that used to carry Stern’s show.

Some of those stations depended so totally on Stern to establish their brand identity that they never had other people on the bench ready to step in. Bad idea. Always program with the idea that you have not one, but a number of stars in different dayparts. Successful stations in varying formats, from 1960-80 WABC and the 1958-78 version of 'KB to today's 97 Rock and WBEN, have done that.

> Depending on the market,
> there are a number of stations carrying different morning
> hosts. So far, here in Rochester, “The Rover” on the “Nerve”
> hasn’t made much of an impression, at least according to the
> ratings I’ve seen and people that I’ve spoken with.

He's not making much impression anywhere except his former home market of Cleveland. He's been a bust in his new HQ market, Chicago, and virtually no one notices him in Rochester. The show sounds small-market and a lot less focused and directed than shows like Wease's or Larry Norton's, which rule the 25-54 morning hot-talk roost in their respective cities.

> Perhaps
> the CBS stations in Rochester should consider hiring local
> talent for their early morning show. But then they risk
> eroding Wease’s numbers, which is something Infinity
> managers do not want to happen.

Wease has shown he doesn't need protecting in Rochester because he actually knocked off Stern when they were going head to head, so Rover isn't enough to even make him break a sweat by comparison.

But the Zone 94.1 has bigger problems, including signal problems (it's arguably the poorest commercial FM signal in the city, coverage-wise). No English language programming format is likely to do much with that signal as of now. It's currently a marginal property for CBS' local cluster, and would be for anyone else operating it as an English language station, though it doesn't have to be. If I were in charge of the cluster I'd be thinking about doing something no one in the market's doing that super-serves a population within the city and inner-ring suburbs where the Zone's signal is good. The Hispanic population in the market, which lives largely within the city and inner suburban ring, is rapidly reaching the critical mass needed to support its own station (it's about where the market's black population was 35 years ago when WDKX was being planned). It currently has no one serving it fulltime. CBS should really consider making 94.1 the first 24/7 Spanish language outlet, programming it primarily for the local Hispanic population (which comes mainly from Puerto Rico and the Caribbean now). If they don't do it with that FM, someone else is going to do it with one of the market's AMs (Entercom's 950 signal would be a good candidate).
 
> If they
> don't do it with that FM, someone else is going to do it
> with one of the market's AMs (Entercom's 950 signal would be
> a good candidate).

Forget it and a convenient way to take out the market's libtalk competition to WXXI. :)

I would think a full time Latino station in this market would likely be music-driven, which is cheaper than some news/talk operation (unless it was entirely taken off satellite), and if people under 40 can't find the AM button on their radio now, I can't imagine a Spanish language outlet locally doing much better. Would that not be the audience you'd want to target with your ads?

When Spanish does come full time here, it will likely be on FM on a station that doesn't exactly burn up the ratings book, or as a sub-channel when HD Radio becomes relevant, if it ever does.
 
CBS sticking it to themselves? Maybe.....

> I view this as CBS finally coming to its senses.
The question is, how will their
> "anything goes" XM show be modified to accomodate their
> presence on terrestrial radio?

I couldn't disagree more. If this actually plays out it reminds me of that commercial that boasts of "sticking it to the man".

You've all seen it: (paraphrasing)

Guy #1: But aren't you "the man"?
Guy #2: Yes.
Guy #1: So, you're sticking it to yourself?
Guy #2: .....(long pause)......Maybe.

I find it mind-boggling that CBS Radio has lost most of its Stern listeners, and now the suits think it's a great idea that they might encourage the rest of their audience to subscribe to XM? BRILLIANT! (with props to the Guinness Beer commercial)

O&A's show will be so heavily modified that I could see people being tempted to tune in to XM to hear what REALLY happened.

> I may just borrow my friend's Sirius receiver to hear Howard
> whine about how he's getting screwed. Talk about gargantuan
> egos.

Actually, Howard seemed to echo my points above more or less. If O&A make it back to local radio they won't have any editorial control. Someone is going to heavily edit their content. Not to mention the fact that listeners and/or advertisers who found the church scandal deeply offensive are going to FREAK!!!!


I could go on.......
 
another thought

Freely thinking here.

If O&A are allowed to promote XM on CBS Radio? Why is Howard Stern being sued for the same thing? If it's because XM & CBS have entered into some sort of an agreement, why wasn't Howard/Sirius afforded the same opportunity?

If I'm a lawyer, I make that point in my motion to dismiss the suit.
<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by ThePickleReport on 04/20/06 10:50 PM.</FONT></P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom