I see in Radio & Records that WFNX has moved to a new tower downtown and doubled its power ... to 6 KW, bygosh!
(http://www.radioandrecords.com/Newsroom/2006_03_30/wfnxboston.asp)
This would seem to be a good move for WFNX, would it not?
The question did occur to me, though: To what extent has low power hampered WFNX in the ratings?
The R&R piece includes an interesting quote from WFNX GM Andy Kingston:
"A huge number of WFNX's listeners either work or live in or around the city of Boston. The No. 1 complaint we get from these people is that they can't receive our signal in their home or office. I am thrilled to finally have a solution for them. Hopefully the only complaint will come from their neighbors asking them to turn down the music!"
(http://www.radioandrecords.com/Newsroom/2006_03_30/wfnxboston.asp)
This would seem to be a good move for WFNX, would it not?
The question did occur to me, though: To what extent has low power hampered WFNX in the ratings?
The R&R piece includes an interesting quote from WFNX GM Andy Kingston:
"A huge number of WFNX's listeners either work or live in or around the city of Boston. The No. 1 complaint we get from these people is that they can't receive our signal in their home or office. I am thrilled to finally have a solution for them. Hopefully the only complaint will come from their neighbors asking them to turn down the music!"