Thank you for the kind words. I think these kinds of discussions can be extremely beneficial. I honestly believe radio as an industry really loses sight of how much fun this all can be because we're too busy looking at charts. Which are completely unrelated to what the audience wants to hear on their favorite station. The debate now, appears to be how do people use us. We're told we're unimportant-background-appliances. If that's the case, this whole performance royalty thing should be an issue for the RIAA. But, that's another discussion.
MoLarryMoLarry said:
Paul - thanks for the response. First intelligent conversation I've ever had in the eight years of posting on this site. The Living Colour debate will always go on and I look forward to your insight in the matter. Perhaps the two of us will enlighten a few with our thoughts and experiences.
First, let me clarify something. The band did not come to us and thank us for being first to ever play them. They came to us because they realized that at that time, FNX was a leading alternative station in the country, and that other stations would read our playlist and follow. that's they way commercial alternative radio formed back then. a format filled plenty of ex-chr programmers suddenly having to play alternative music and completely unsure what to play until they saw the FNXs and the KROQs and the HFSs make the move first. THAT'S what got LC on the 'modern rock' charts and those very intelligent guys in that band knew that. hence, the personal thanks from them. I'm not saying and would never say that FNX was responsible for their success - I'm saying we were instrumental in getting them exposure to an alternative audience that embraced them as an alternative band.
And I think that's something missing from ALL formats today. And there's no debate...the guys in LC are extremely smart...and in Vernon/Doug's case, slightly crazy.
MoLarryMoLarry said:
The songwriting and viewpoints musically of LC make them alternative. Vernon Reid is a founding member of the Black Rock Coalition, an organization quoted as being made up "of artists and producers dedicated to furthering the cause of black alternative music". LOTS of alternative bands toured with Metal or Rock bands to get the break they needed. Nirvana toured with Guns and Roses - was Nirvana metal or was Guns and Roses alternative? I'd say the fact that LC is part of the Lollapalooza legacy (they were on the very first tour) tells me they enjoy being considered alternative.
Lollapalooza would be a fantastic barometer had Metallica not once headlined.
I would agree that LC presented music with lyrical substance far beyond what was the norm at the time. And that also speaks to the disappointment that they're never given their proper respect as a genius band. Musically, lyrically, and socially. Like a (sorry for the categorization) Hard Rock Public Enemy.
MoLarryMoLarry said:
Remember that "alternative" is a relative term. It encompasses so many genres of music, that every one, from the english pop synth groups to ska bands with black and white kids to the flavor of the month american punk bands, owes something to someone preceding them. What sucks about the label "alternative" is that people believe that to be one definitive form of music created by three punky smelly white guys in a garage. FNX embracing of the Kinks, the Who, MC5 etc. is awesome. But there is still so much more to explore within the genre that could make FNX shine.
You're right. I am disappointed that alternative came over and grabbed extremely non-alternative music in the mid-90's. Godsmack? Metallica? No. And Rock radio has done the same. The cross-formatic dilution is (IMHO) a result of radio programmers becoming lazy and/or allowing record companies and independent promoters too much influence over their playlists in order to manipulate the charts. Which we all know has nothing to do with
good music, but only
how many spins a song receives.
So, the labels told their artist that the song was blowing up on several formats and used that "promotional expense" to write a larger artist charge back bill and increase their profits. Meanwhile some stations damaged their brands over the long term because of foolish decisions, not made in the best interests. And confused the audience.
Which brings us back to Living Colour. It doesn't matter what tour they were on, or what station claims to be part of their story. Because, in the end, the audience remain the only legitimate arbiter. If the FNX kids think Living Colour is an alt-rock band, then they are. I don't
think they do. I
think Living Colour are viewed overall by the FNX audience as not belonging on the same stations as the Tings Tings, or Smiths, or Manchester Orchestra. But, I could very well be wrong. And again...
it doesn't matter what I think.
The
audience decides. They are the consumer. This remains a consumer-driven marketplace.
And someone must've asked the audience right? You'd hope so.
Thanks again for the discussion. I bet we've hit a few hot buttons that might set off legitimate tangential discussions related to radio. I believe that was part of Doug's initial vision for these boards.