• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WGBH-FM Getting Serious About HD

> The Boston Globe's music critic, Richard Dyer, doesn't write
> about radio very often, but today (04/14) he ran a lengthy
> column about WGBH-FM's plans for HD radio's 2nd channel. I
> have a suspicion that WGBH's publicity department sent Mr.
> Dyer a press release so he would in turn provide this
> information to the people most affected by it. Read all
> about it at:
>
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/living/artic> les/2006/04/14/offerings_on_wgbh_expand_via_high_definition/
>
Ooops...make that

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/li...erings_on_wgbh_fm_expand_via_high_definition/

(forgot the _fm_ part)
 
> WGBH is putting themselves in a good position. Lots of WCRB
> listeners will be buying HD radios when WCRB goes away.
>

wcrb will stay in hd. it's not going away in that sense.<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by RadioHand on 04/19/06 02:23 AM.</FONT></P>
 
> > WGBH is putting themselves in a good position. Lots of
> WCRB
> > listeners will be buying HD radios when WCRB goes away.
> >
>
> wcrb will stay in hd. it's not going away in that sense.

I doubt that WCRB will remain on 102.5-2. Isn't that what WTKK-2 is for?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom