• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WGBH has acquired Public Radio International

They had the cash laying around to do this, but they cut back on their Jazz programming for economic reasons. You got this one right, it’s all about clout and influence.
 
It's amazing how "public" radio (and television) always seems the ability to "throw the cash around" and to be able buy multiple stations in a given area, or total networks. Somehow, they always seem to have the best equipment money can buy. They have plenty of "underwriters" of major importance. (They are so close to being "commercial" it's mind boggling.) Check out the closings of some shows on "public" radio or TV and you'll see. Yet, they still have beg-a-thons. I honestly don't think any one "public" broadcaster is in any danger of being taken off the air, even if the individual "donors" decide to forgo sending "pledges". Even if the economy tanks, they will still find a way to make it. Somebody's really doing their homework.
 
Yes. Would they survive without listener contributions? Maybe, maybe not but who knows. Of course someone like me would rather see the FCC allow them to run ads instead of taking public funding (they're close enough to commercial already). Though yes it's quaint to think of stations taking donations from their listeners---like WJIB which COULD run commercials, but Bob B. doesn't want snake oil remedies, etc. "Commercial free" thanks to listener donations.

Great equipment and signals. Big money donations from corporations (oil companies, Hollywood, car rentals,
manufacturing concerns)

And Now A Message From Our Corporate Sponsors: The NPR Donor List, 2008
and yes I'm talking NPR here not so much 'gbh)
http://www.npr.org/about/aboutnpr/annualreports/NPRSponsorsDonors08.pdf
(GM, Progressive, Pabst, Fox Broadcasting,Citibank, UPS, Paramount...)
 
raccoonradio said:
Yes. Would they survive without listener contributions? Maybe, maybe not but who knows.

It's really very simple: Listener contributions influence their programming. So if their listeners stopped donating to their news programming, they'd shift gears to something else. That's what happened to jazz.

Purchasing radio stations or syndicators are investments towards increasing their donations, their footprint, and their ability to raise money. You need to spend money to make money. When I ran a public radio station, we couldn't do any fundraising until we were on the air. That cost us hundreds of thousands of dollars. Our first fundraiser netted about $30,000, which was less than 5% of our debt at the time. But within a few years, we came up with programming that attracted more money. That's what WGBH is doing. They spent a few million to buy WCRB, and that's afforded them the ability to diversify their programming offerings, specialize one station for classical and the other for news. That helps them attract financial support.

With PRI they can go to their funders and say they can deliver larger audiences in more places than Boston. Boston is a lovely town, but if they could reach people in other places, that would be better. That's what PRI gets them, and why it's worth a few million to get it. They're betting that they will make that money back through increased donations and grants in a few years. Until then, it's another loss that offsets their income and keeps the place from making a profit. So yes, if you've ever had to go to someone and ask for money, it's not easy. And you want to make your case as desperate as you can. But nobody is going to donate money to an organization that is in danger of disappearing. That would be a waste of money. So while they are on their knees asking for support, these moves make it evident that they aren't in danger of shutting down, and therefore are a good risk for people who like what they're doing to give money.
 
Improv said:
What are the ramifications of this for WBUR's pick-up of PRI shows?
No doubt, WBUR is a big thorn on WGBH's side. After all, WBUR has had a much longer history in the news/talk genre than WGBH does. They are truly outstanding in the work they do over at 'BUR. There's an old saying, "If you can't beat 'em, buy them"! So, that's what WGBH has done with the acquisition of PRI. And if you think for one minute that WGBH would deliberately pull PRI as one of WBUR's primary sources for programming...... ask yourself this question ....what do YOU think they WOULD do? It's truly a "dog-eat-dog" world out there in news/talk, even in the "non-commercial" side of things. This should be interesting.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom