trusty said:
CJ_Jackson said:
920 is usually a pretty quiet channel compared to some, so overall it gets out decently at night.
Yup. Sounds almost like an X-bander here. 640 is a hash of stations at night. 750 is WSB over 2 other stations.
Also, 680, 970 and 1080 are pretty clear Louisville stations at night (besides 840, of course). 790 is a mess of stations. 590 - forget it.
590 is indeed a mess after dark. When I'm not in the car with the XM, Radio Disney after sunset--or even near sunset--is a mess on the northeast side. Yes, I know their snow angel pattern points from Powder Springs to the SE, but still. I would expect more from their 4500W night (third strongest night signal in the ATL, behind You Know Who and WCNN).
640 has to protect CBN out of Newfoundland (too bad they couldn't move their tower to Sweat Mountain or some other northern point in the metro and go directional southerly at night. Heck--I wonder if they could use the WDWD field to throw a directional signal?).
1080 has KRLD in Dallas and WTIC in Hartford.
WSB has gotten harder to DX cleanly over the years. Getting WSB in Indiana--not that far to DX a class A clear--is next to impossible.
I remember when 96 Rock was simuled on 970. They would sign all they way off at dusk--none of this "lightbulb power" stuff after dark. I seem to remember them signing off one time in the late afternoon, before sunset--is it possible that they would not have been licensed at that time to broadcast during critical hours, or did the AM guy just want to knock off early? They would sign off with the Looney Tunes "Merry Go Round Broke Down" ("That's All Folks!)" closing, go to dead air, and then you'd hear the Tx cut off and static from elsewhere come in.
Why do so many stations now run small power at night (versus signing off altogether)? I know that the FCC won't license any new daytimers. What is the rationale for that? Covering the city of license 24/7? It seems that these stations pollute the airwaves a great deal for what is probably minimal listenership.