• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

What Are The CW's Strongest Affiliates?

I'm being serious here. In recent years, even stations owned by Tribune, such as WPIX in New York (and yes, WTXX in Hartford, MarcB) have shed the CW branding of their on air identities.

So which CW affiliate is indeed the strongest these days, in spite of this?
 
DToTheJ said:
I'm being serious here. In recent years, even stations owned by Tribune, such as WPIX in New York (and yes, WTXX in Hartford, MarcB) have shed the CW branding of their on air identities.

So which CW affiliate is indeed the strongest these days, in spite of this?

IMHO, I would say WPSG in Philadelphia.
 
The Hartford reference should read WCCT-TV Waterbury/Hartford. This station only survived because it became a sister of WTIC-TV (FOX) channel 61 of Hartford.
 
I'm only counting stations with local news so I would say...

WPIX NYC
KTLA Los Angeles
WGN Chicago
KBCW San Francisco
WPSG Philadelphia
XETV Tijuana (serving San Diego)
KWGN Denver
 
While they don't have local news, I've always heard WGNT, channel 27 in Portsmouth, Virginia (Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News, VA-NC market) is one of the CW's strongest performers along with WJZY, channel 46, Belmont, NC (Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC market)
 
The CW is such a mess. How to take two small networks, put them together and make an even smaller network. Maybe it's just me but at times I thought the WB and UPN were pretty good.
 
Mike Sheridan said:
The CW is such a mess. How to take two small networks, put them together and make an even smaller network. Maybe it's just me but at times I thought the WB and UPN were pretty good.

They were. The CW took all the diversity out of the merger and threw it in the trash while making up mostly crap in the process. The only decent shows on there these days is the Vampire Diaries and Supernatural.
 
Robnoxious said:
KTLA was at it's strongest as an independent (which I pray it returns back to).
As The CW, not so much.

KTLA started to do Hard hitting stories when the Bell Robert Rizzo Scandal Surfaced.
 
I think outside of the KTLAs of the world (WGN, etc.), news really doesn't matter in this mythical contest of "strongest CW affiliates".

VERY few CW affiliates do news of any sort, outside of either the very largest markets, or some who run secondary casts produced by other network affiliates.
 
OhioMediaWatch said:
VERY few CW affiliates do news of any sort, outside of either the very largest markets, or some who run secondary casts produced by other network affiliates.

Remember, starting this year, CW affiliate KIAH in Houston (owned by Tribune) is debuting a new local news "format" (in quotes because the new format looks like a trainwreck).
 
WCWG Greensboro, NC was a big CW affiliate (and WB before that, as WTWB) in the days of analog TV. Supposedly they had the strongest digital signal in the market, but I get four other stations perfectly and have frequent pixillating with them now. It didn't happen when DTV first started, and I was told they would upgrade when the shut down the analog station. Nope, no change. So I watch WJZY on cable. I suppose since they have a WBTV-produced newscast they are stronger.
 
kilamanjero said:
Mike Sheridan said:
The CW is such a mess. How to take two small networks, put them together and make an even smaller network. Maybe it's just me but at times I thought the WB and UPN were pretty good.

They were. The CW took all the diversity out of the merger and threw it in the trash while making up mostly crap in the process. The only decent shows on there these days is the Vampire Diaries and Supernatural.
Not "Smallville"? The quality seems to be going up.
 
musicman3355 said:
I'm only counting stations with local news so I would say...
Snip.....
KWGN Denver
Where the news is produced by KDVR 31, the FOX affiliate? I think not.

Not only that, but they time shift CW primetime to a 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM block, which is hybrid for a Mountain Time Zone station. That would be like KMGH 7 running ABC primetime from 8:00 PM to 11:00 PM because they have the #3 newscast (Which of course ABC would never let them do even if they wanted to).

But getting back to KWGN 2, it is one of THE WORST rated stations in town. Only KTVD 20 (MyNetwork TV), KRMA 6, KBDI 12 (Both PBS), KCDO 3 (RTV) & the Godcasters are worse off than KWGN is. In fact, DARE I SAY IT but I would venture to say that even the Latin stations get more viewers than KWGN does (Univision affiliate KCEC 50 MOST CERTAINLY would).

The only reason why Local TV even bothers with KWGN is because it's a good place to dump some cheap programming on & makes them more $$$. KTVD 20 does the same thing for Gannett.

KWGN even has the local OTA rights to the (Now) World Champion Colorado Rapids MLS regular season games. That's how hard up the station has become.

Just my opinion.....

Cheers :D
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom