scottsvb5 said:
PDs and the suits are killing Rock radio cause they just don't understand the listener and alot (but not all) of the DJ's fall into that category also. Right now.. talk radio on FM is bringing in the ratings.. and why is that? Cause people are tired of hearing the same songs over the past 25 years on the radio
I've fought this battle for over 20 years. The fact is you, and I are wrong.
Time after time, the audience of Rock radio station around America, tell radio what to play. And time after time, the same 2 dozen songs come back as audience favorites. Could there be more *depth?* Absolutely. But, the argument that people are tired of the same songs, simply a proven falsehood.
scottsvb5 said:
1. Rock is Rock music..meaning hard (not meaning metal) with a good beat, guitar, vocals...
Again, respectfully disagree. There are many down-tempo songs that "rock." Rock is a lifestyle. A mindset. This is where Rock radio is failing. The age of AOR has returned. Rock fans like their favorite songs. No matter from whom, and what sub-genre you can toss. Look at the most popular downloaded songs every week. More often than not, you will see "Don't Stop Believing" in the top of songs that are considered "rock." Limiting the menu, always limits the potential audience. The secret to success in Rock; play hits. That's what the audience wants.
Now, how to preserve the future of Rock? That's the trick. I won't spell it out here. But, it can be done. You just have to have the right people in place on your station, and execute the plan with the proper mindset. This often contradicts conventional "business." However, Radio...is far from the typical business model.
scottsvb5 said:
Just play Active Rock and the "Best" modern rock bands. We don't need alternative stations anymore. It kills the ratings.
Prove this. Or, at least classify it as your opinion. *You* don't need alternative stations in your life. However, Alternative is a viable niche format in some areas. It will never be mass-appeal because it's not supposed to be. In fact, Rock radio will never truly be mass appeal. The fact is; *not everyone likes rock music* Everyone likes *some* rock music. But, the masses will never look at Rock as their primary choice. It's like eating Pizza every day. You can't do it. Sure, there are different toppings of Pizza. Just as there are different sub-genres of Rock. But, in the end, it's still just Pizza. And not everybody will want it all the time, every day. Your assertions re: Alternative stations fall under this logic.
scottsvb5 said:
After Alternative music started to come out in the early-mid 90s.. there was 2 markets for Rock... Alternative and Active Rock heading into 2000. This is giving too much diversatey(sp?) to the selection of music.
Funny, I hear people talk about Alternative's heyday being "the early-mid 90's" all the time. All of whom forget that MTV played "New Wave" since the beginning. Which is also "alternative." Bands like Missing Persons, Thompson Twins, Thomas Dolby, Eurythmics, and yes, U2 are *all* Alternative bands. We can even go back to the 70s with Lou Reed/Velvet Underground, Elvis Costello, The Police, The Clash, Patti Smith, Blondie and Talking Heads. Alternative bands who got airplay. Many of those bands moved forward in to the 80's and opened doors for R.E.M., Violent Femmes, and a whole host of one-hit-wonders that were commonplace on Rock radio.
There was a time when *Rock* radio played The Allman Brothers, Ozzy, AC/DC, REM, and Prince on the *same* station. And, it worked. So, listening to people claim "alternative" had it's best years in the early-mid 90's, makes me feel like the speaker has little understanding of what Alternative really is.
scottsvb5 said:
Back in the 70s-80s.. Rock music was different but all out in a happening way. So what I'm saying is.. just play Active Rock.. most of todays kids that listen to Rock music want to hear todays bands like Disturbed,Shinedown,5 FingerdeathPunch,Avenge Sevenfold..
No. They don't. They actually love Beastie Boys, Metallica, Black Sabbath Guns n' Roses & Led Zeppelin. That's the hard truth. Because that's what you're hearing on Rock radio. If people wanted to hear those bands en masse, they'd be dominating Top 40 Radio. That's where "most" of today's kids are listening.
scottsvb5 said:
They are tired of the Pearl Jam, Smashing Punkins,,, stuff from the 90s that has been played Non-Stop in most markets for almost 20 years. Give it up!
Here you have a legitimate point. The number of songs from those bands that people say they want to hear has diminished. Unfortunately, preferences haven't move toward newer Rock. They've gone backward toward *better* Rock. We must accept this truth; Led Zeppelin are better than Disturbed. The audience have dictated it to be true. Whether you, or anyone wants to refute it, that's not our business. Our business is to *play what the audience wants*
They want Zeppelin.
scottsvb5 said:
2. Bring back some of the hair bands that made music fun to listen to... Yes it was very glammy...but there is a reason they went Gold and Platinum.. they had the best ballads. Bands like Tesla,Poison,Firehouse,MotleyCrue,Kiss,Iron Maiden,Anthrax,Megadeth,Whitelion,Queensryche,... I can go on and on but PD's are afraid to play most of this type of music.
Not true. There are Rock stations around America that play the best of the Hair Bands that people care about, every day. That is an extremely limited list as well. But, it exists, and is being executed daily. Perhaps not in your city.
scottsvb5 said:
If you want older 70s classic rock...expand your 70s-early 80s playlist.. people listen to radio about 20-30 min 2 times a day in their car.
Again, your assertions as to *how* people use radio are clearly speculative at best. We as an industry don't really know how *everyone* uses radio. It's impossible. So, we must create a product that is a desirable choice when people want aural entertainment.
scottsvb5 said:
they DONT want to hear the same songs over and over again..
Yes. They do. They tell us this repeatedly. Go to a bar with a jukebox. Look at the choices that people *spend money* to hear. Sit there for a few hours and count how often you hear the same songs, by the same bands.
scottsvb5 said:
so they listen to Talk radio instead...
No. They don't. Show me a market where Talk is the dominant station overall.
scottsvb5 said:
if you PDs want better ratings... make your station Fun..
Couldn't agree more.
scottsvb5 said:
and give the listener music that was popular but isn't heard that often
Couldn't disagree more. There is a balance. Finding it, is the path to a stronger station.
scottsvb5 said:
And if your station is more of the Active Rock format.. Play more New Music.. People want to hear New Music ... not the same 90s songs over and over and over and over and over ............
When this becomes more than your personal opinion, it might become the norm. Until then, it's simply your opinion.
Appreciate the conversation.