• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

What exactly DOES Atlanta need in radio?

Radio K! said:
Well, some one should realize that "Taking a risk is needed"! Radio is in such bad shape because the old formulas are not working. Taking that risk, and developing new talent, and new concepts might be what it takes to produce revenue in the future. The big boys need to be looking at the next decade instead of the next fiscal quarter. There are a of of untapped ideas, and resources out there.

What you explained, though, is the old formulas. The new formulas are what the corporations have brought to radio, blaming iPods and satellite radio for their demise. That's not the problem. The problem is that, even in other industries, that the people have become a liability instead of a resourceful entity. I know I'm preaching to the choir on this, but we, as listeners, turn to a radio station in the first place because of the genre of music appeals to us. We stay there because we enjoy the personalities, people who relate to the listener and vice-versa. People that make us feel we're not alone while we're stuck in traffic, or working in our office, or trying to stay up at night at work, or if we can't sleep.

Yeah, my last sentence is directed to one of the most neglected shifts in radio: overnights. One of my fondest memories on air (on the overnight shift) is having my listeners call in and have a good chat. I kept them awake during their overnight shifts at work. I was their friend they called when they couldn't get to sleep and needed someone to talk to. It's a great shift to groom new talent, to give them much needed experience to interact with some of the most interesting kinds of people (yeah, Whodini was right that "The Freaks Come Out At Night" too), yet that shift is neglected by the higher ups since Arby doesn't rate it.
 
Radio is in such bad shape because the old formulas are not working. Taking that risk, and developing new talent, and new concepts might be what it takes to produce revenue in the future. The big boys need to be looking at the next decade instead of the next fiscal quarter. There are a of of untapped ideas, and resources out there.

OK name five untapped ideas.
 
What does radio really need to survive?

1. Something entertaining
2. Something informative
3. Something local and stimulating
4. Something that makes money
and the most important thing radio needs to survive...
5. Radio needs a way to make itself become the preeminent entertainment media in the country by activitating listener's imaginations with content that hasn't been done before and can hold the attention span of the average 2-year-old.

(I say "2-year-old" because that's my analogy as to how short the average American's attention span has become.)

Can radio recover it's glory...yes, but only by doing something that doesn't go for a quick, cheap and easy buck.
 
well, one out of five.
Your suggestions (1-4) are currently being done.
Number 5 is still out as I believe Howard Stern is proving THAT isn't important.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom