Hi All,
I've read the posts here over the last week or so with emotions ranging from bemusement to bewilderment. So, for what it's worth, I thought I set the record straight to the extent that I deem it appropriate at the present time.
Yes, I was discharged, fired, sacked, et al. In short, it was not my decision to leave but given the background and circumstances as I know them all should know who care that I bear no ill will. In the final analysis, creative differences were very much at the heart of the issue - and really - that was all.
I must take issue here with some of the posts with regard to compensation. KAAM was the best paying job I'd ever had in my 19 years in broadcasting. I was not being asked to pay for my programs, nor did I ever pay to work there. It was a job that I did to the best of my ability and I was paid well for the priviledge.
In my nearly three years there this last time, I have nothing but praise for owner and GM, Don Crawford, Jr. and most of the staff at KAAM. I had a great time there and Don was always fair and equitable to me over this period of time. We parted friends and I told him if there was ever anything I could do for him or KAAM - just pick up the phone. Yes! I meant it.
In any case and in all likelihood, my broadcasting days are now over. And that's just fine with me. In my view, what passes for "personality driven" radio today is just a bunch of half-way decent broadcast quality voices reading generic liner notes and regurgitating the same 300 song playlist as created by Program Directors with shorter attention spans than a 3 year old, sandwiched in between the next 10 spot stop set.
REAL RADIO - with variety in music - and DJ's who let you know what music you're listening to, and occasionally imparting stories behind the songs and the artists, for the most part, is dead. KAAM still comes closer than anyone else in this miserable market to this standard and their last rating was a .3 - so I supoose I'm wrong again.
As Paul Berlin at KQUE in Houston used to say, "Be informative; Be entertaining; Or be quiet." Oh well, a philosophy for another era.
Permit me one more as I close, and I'm paraphrasing Edward R. Murrow when he was talking about television. But, it's inclusion is appropriate here for the condition of radio in 2009:
"This instrument can teach, it can illuminate - yes - and it can even inspire. But it can do so only to the extent that humans are determined to use it to those ends. Otherwise, it is merely wires and lights in a box."
I wish you well,
Cary Richards