cspotrun said:i too wish KTXT would have tried your listener based model, it would have proven my point about this...i don't think the younger demo would have had enough money to spend supporting a radio station if it was listener based to save KTXT, and the older audience for KOHM would not have supported it over what you're getting...
I don't think KTXT would have survived as a listener-supported station either, not because of a lack of money to donate, but because for the younger demos, radio is thought of as being old-fashioned. Too many iPods and cellphones competing, and the format wasn't what most students would listen to- I repeatedly heard from many Tech students that the format did not appeal to them.
And as for KOHM donors supporting KTXT, they likely would have if they were given that opportunity as several have told me so. But I agree that in general, the KOHM donor base probably wouldn't have, not so much because they already gave it all to KOHM, but because once again they didn't find the format that appealing. It's hard for me to imagine much of a crossover audience from KOHM to KTXT, but there were a few.
my only problem with you DG is your idea that commercial radio should try somehow to be listener supported instead of what they're doing, 1st, it will never happen, and it would never work, if someone wants to try, see how fast they fade from the air, and it wouldn't be for bad programming, although there is some bad programming out there for sure.
I'm not suggesting that commercial radio should somehow try to be listener supported. I'm suggesting that they COULD, and provoking the question as to why they DON'T. I merely offered and defended that there are alternatives to the traditional advertising revenue that has been the mainstay for radio since the early 20th Century. Unfortunately, as you have well stated, that method doesn't seem to be working as well as it used to. So what else to try then?
I agree with you: no commercial station in its right mind would dare ask its audience for money. But why not? Commercial radio fund-raised a ton of cash after 9/11. They did the same for the Red Cross and Salvation Army following Katrina and Rita. But they wouldn't try doing the same for themselves? Why is that?
if its working for you GREAT, just leave the rest of us alone. you can't be us, and we can't be you. lets leave it at that. now stop posting, you are driving me nuts.
I didn't realize I was pestering anyone else other than you Cspot- but if you review this thread, you'll see that you were the one that asked.
Ahh but I can be YOU. I WAS you many years ago. Gulfstar taught me that commercial radio is all about the advertisers and the listeners be damned. I couldn't understand why they would destroy a well-established brand in the market, but once I learned it was always about making a quick buck, it became very clear.
It wasn't always that way. And only a few stations are left that think and operate under the old premise of serving listeners. They seem to be doing well despite the hard times.
I'll continue to post where I see an opportunity to further the discussion or clarify a point, and I'm sure many have enjoyed the entertainment this thread has become.
My apologies to Crow for hijacking it...