I have to get my 2 cents worth in on this discussion. As somebody who has programmed a small AAA station, I think I can make some viable observations.
Why is it that most of the radio biz is obsessed with being Number 1? Can't you be #6 and still bill better than #3? I don't know if S-T is struggling with WTTS' billing, but I have a suspicion that they're OK. If a station is reaching 25-54 year olds, then sales ought to be able to pitch it.
Unplugged... I feel your pain, and I too think WTTS is a great station. I don't think voice-tracking is the death of radio, but it is certainly a growning cancer that needs some attention. With that said, I do believe for a AAA station, voice-tracking would be a death knell.
How can WXRT keep the same jocks, the same program director and the same news people for years??!!! Either they pay them a crapload of money, or the jocks love what they do and where they work. I have a sneaking suspicion Terri Hemmert isn't exactly rich. It is a great station (although I would love to hear more newer stuff) and will probably always be my favorite.
I was having a discussion about radio with an old college buddy earlier this week. My question for rock radio is, "When the hell are we planning on growing up?" I don't party every night. I have kids, a decent job and I actually go to church every once in awhile. I coach my son's football team, I volunteer to do video work for my daughter's basketball league. I don't give a crap how drunk the jock was the night before, and for God's sake, how many times and how many ways must we refer to male or female genitalia?
If you never read Steve Van Zandt's (Little Steve/Miami Steve/Silvio Dante) speech at the Jacobs Media Summit in 2005, I highly suggest it. It is, for the most part how I feel about radio... but I think it can be changed!
http://www.littlesteven.com/keynotespeech.html
"Grampa, where were you WHEN THE ******* ******* TOOK OVER?"