• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

What SNR Should Do

O

ocradiofreak

Guest
If SNR is really strapped for cash maybe they should just consider syndicating Bruno and maybe one or two other shows during the week, and the weekends. That way they will save money. I don't know maybe something like that...
 
> If SNR is really strapped for cash maybe they should just
> consider syndicating Bruno and maybe one or two other shows
> during the week, and the weekends. That way they will save
> money. I don't know maybe something like that...
>

SNR may or may not be hemorrhaging money (as Chet Coppock told the Chicago Tribune). SNR is wholly owned by Paul Allen, the country’s third richest man. The changes being made by SNR seem to be consistent with increasing pro forma cash flow in anticipation of a sale. Are there any real buyers out there for the radio network? For the NY/Boston/LA stations? Or even the Portland stations? I have no idea. Allen has much bigger problems with his other investments such as Charter Cable.<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by longpets on 03/13/06 02:12 PM.</FONT></P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom