• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

What will/should Fox do with My Network TV?

Fox owns WWOR-TV in NYC but they are not using the Fox+ branding. I wonder if Fox has other plans for this station. I know they have been taking a lot of heat lately because WWOR is licensed to NJ yet covers very little, if any, local NJ programming.
 
WJZY and WMYT both transmit from a tower in Dallas, N.C., about 20 miles west of Charlotte. Based on any terrain issues, they should both be receivable.
 
It won't happen WWOR has a traditional of those call letters alone and who knows WNYW will eventually add a traditional newscast on WWOR (just not in competition with WNYW's newscasts).
 
Will MyNetwork TV continue after next year or will it be scrapped?

That will depend on how many affiliates are still interested in paying the affiliate fees and how much ad revenue it brings in on the network side There are so many similar 'dot' channels out there now for stations to choose from, there is a lot of competition.
 
Will MyNetwork TV continue after next year or will it be scrapped?

The two main affiliates of MyNetworkTV are the Fox duopoly stations WWOR and KCOP. Fox obviously needs prime time programming for those stations. So strategically, the programming on those stations will likely determine the future of the network. Having said that, when Fox sold assets to Disney, it retained MyNetworkTV. So they must have a plan of some sort.
 
The two main affiliates of MyNetworkTV are the Fox duopoly stations WWOR and KCOP. Fox obviously needs prime time programming for those stations. So strategically, the programming on those stations will likely determine the future of the network. Having said that, when Fox sold assets to Disney, it retained MyNetworkTV. So they must have a plan of some sort.

I must respectfully disagree considering for a few years both affiliates moved the MyNet programming to later in the night so they can show syndicated programming. They have since moved it back to primetime (as of right now). Here in Minneapolis WFTC (another FOX O&O duopoly) has pushed MyNet programming back to 10-midnight Central time so they could show a 7pm news and then syndicated programming. They have been "off pattern" for 3 years now. I know there are some other larger MyNet duopolies do the same.

They dont even brand it as MyNetwork or "My__" anymore. Its FOX9+ here in Minneapolis. Phoenix is My10Xtra, Dallas is Fox4More, DC is Fox 5 Plus, Portland is Fox 12 Plus. Some larger affiliates just use their callsign for branding (KRON) or have a cute name like "22 the point", "Star 64", "The ATL"
 
Last edited:
Not a duopoly market, but for 2018-2019, WPHL in Philly dumped the My Network shows to the middle of the night. They'd dipped their toes in that previously, pushing an hour of programming two times per week to overnight to make way for Celebrity Name Game, but this year, the whole thing got moved to the insomniac special to make way for the likes of Mom, Blackish and Goldbergs. Concurrently, the branding went away, though it still maintains a similar box and color palette.

To Kelly A's point, is there a value to what that costs vs. just filling those hours with more low-budget reruns? Chalk enough markets off the list, and naturally that calculus begins to shift.
 
IF local stations would go back to syndicated reruns, movies, and sports then I would be for dropping My Network or ending it completely. But there are too many stations that would probably go to more trash talk, courtroom shows, and infomercials, and in those cases I'd rather see them stay with My Network even though I might not watch it.
 
I must respectfully disagree considering for a few years both affiliates moved the MyNet programming to later in the night so they can show syndicated programming.

Part of the confusing nature of MyNetwork programming is the titles in 2019 are familiar as either NBC or CBS shows. Law & Order, Dateline, CSI, and others in the schedule could be confused as off-net reruns or syndication. But they're part of the network program offering.
 
I don't know about other "Fox+" stations but the Phoenix version (OTA 45.1 or Cox 9) is a loser. The only program of any value it airs occurs at 10AM local when it goes to a streaming version of "current" news. Usually that means it just locks on to a sat feed of some politician (usually You-Know-Who) bleating his or her version of what happened lately. They tend to join the speech already in progress and unless it contains some inflammatory language they depart before it is over. Mostly worthless except to employ their news readers for another 2 hours per day.

The rest of their programming is even worse than the mother ship if that is possible. Given the generally terrible programming and/or signals of the LP subs in this market "Fox+" could provide much more quality programming. Why it doesn't is a huge question.
 
KTVU+ is the Fox Owned secondary Fox Affiliate in San Francisco and they are the first Fox O&O to use the Fox Plus name and they were never an affiliate of My Network TV. KTVU Plus simply airs reruns and pre-empted Fox Programming whenever KTVU Fox 2 the Primary Fox Owned station has to go to breaking news or air Fox Sports programming.

But there is one Meredith station out in Portland, Oregon where they renamed their Secondary station Fox 12 Plus after the primary Fox Affiliate in the Portland area and they are the first known Non Fox Owned station to name their secondary station as Fox Plus.

Nexstar in San Francisco currently has an affiliation deal with My Network TV for now but KRON does not emphasize My Network branding or programming in the area for some reason though. KRON mainly does promos for their newscasts and syndicated programming that airs on the station but rarely my network programming even though they are an affiliate of mntv.

KICU-TV also airs Fox 2 News at 7 that's produced by the main Fox O&O's KTVU Fox 2 News.
 
WMYT is an O&O yet they bump the programming to 11pm-1am in favor of Modern Family and Big Bang Theory reruns...and I can’t say I blame them. Basically another independent to rival WAXN.
 
Part of the confusing nature of MyNetwork programming is the titles in 2019 are familiar as either NBC or CBS shows. Law & Order, Dateline, CSI, and others in the schedule could be confused as off-net reruns or syndication. But they're part of the network program offering.
Who is the hot blonde on "Dateline"? My 12 shows a photo with a black guy and a blonde girl when advertising the show.
 
The two main affiliates of MyNetworkTV are the Fox duopoly stations WWOR and KCOP. Fox obviously needs prime time programming for those stations. So strategically, the programming on those stations will likely determine the future of the network. Having said that, when Fox sold assets to Disney, it retained MyNetworkTV. So they must have a plan of some sort.



https://deadline.com/2019/08/fox-en...burgers-animation-house-bento-box-1202662814/

You gotta consider another thing though Fox Corp (The Murdoch) owned outlet just had a deal with Bento Box Studios. How that affects Fox and My Network is yet to be seen though.
 
As they’ve termed themselves as a syndication service as opposed to a traditional network, My Network TV isn’t recognized in network programming ratings books. The stations rebranding as Fox+ are where Fox owns them as well as the regular Fox affiliate. Our My Network TV affiliate, owned by Tegna, brands themselves as “The ATL.” Could Fox change MNTV’s name? Perhaps—a syndication service using the word “network” in its name seems rather contradictory. I wouldn’t use Fox+ as that would confuse some over that and regular Fox.

I would label it FOX AMERICA like WGN AMERICA executives give me credit if you use that please thank you.
 
To Kelly A's point, is there a value to what that costs vs. just filling those hours with more low-budget reruns? Chalk enough markets off the list, and naturally that calculus begins to shift.

It depends: Ten years ago stations were taking a chance with running old classic TV shows and movies on their 'dot-two, or three' channels. Most of the costs were co-op, so local stations had very little downside being able to sell several breaks in an hour. After a couple years, stations started to see actual revenue from their low/no cost ancillary digital channels, so they added that revenue to budget predictions. This became even easier when the FCC forced dot-two must carry on local cable and satellite providers. More recently stations re-play their syndicated and paid programs on their 'dot' channels, because they're getting more bang for the syndicated buck by airing the same show on multiple channels. If stations are able to re-purpose programming that they've already paid for, then classic TV and movie networks are less relevant.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom