> CC Akron is doing Lib talk b/c they also have a conservative
> talk as well. They've got both sides. I'll bet the lib
> talker isn't making $$$. It's there to be a blocker, not a
> money maker. Better CC have it than someone else. It doesn't
> cost much to run.
Well, yeah, I would think WCWA would have that on their to-do list, but in the absense, I can't imagine it would be entirely cost prohibitive for a group like the one in Buffalo (or the liberal groups that brokered daily hours on WERE in Cleveland) to pony up some cash as an ideological cause. Besides, I can't see this WTOD thing going very far, especially with the weak lineup (yes, I know, my oft-criticized Dave Ramsey is #1 IIRC).
> Lib talk would work in Toledo. It would get ratings, but it
> wouldn't sell. Not as well as a conserative. That's just the
> plain simple truth. I've worked for stations that did well
> ratings wise, but didn't bring in the $$$. Revenue is more
> important. WPLJ is a good example. Numbers aren't
> impressive, but it's a cash cow. Money talks. Ratings are
> for bragging at the bar.
Steph Miller and Ed Schultz are easier sells that much of the AAR lineup, but there's always a weekend with no real compelling libtalk programming (outside of best ofs) that could be whored out at $250/hr to both local clients and national shows. You could simulcast a TV morning show or evening newscast and get cash from the station. Find local liberals to pay a fee to host a weekly evening talk show. I know you're aware of these ideas, but there are plenty of creative ways to bring in revenue that stations with 0.0 have, and they're not going broke.