Shawn O'Domski said:
From reading other television related blog/gossip sites, the word is the WHDH Meltdown was caused by their new computer system crashing. The station recently went "tapeless." Meaning, the stories are being played on the air via some type of computer system. Word is the new system crashed about 40 minutes before the 11:00 show, and they weren't able to get it back up and running properly. I'm not saying this is the truth...it's just what I have read on other "gossip" sites.
That's what I've been trying to figure out since I first heard about this story a few days ago. The station I work for went tapeless about 18 months ago. We've had occasional serious problems but never came anywhere near cancelling a newscast!
Generally, two separate computer systems are involved: one contains the audio & video, a separate system handles the text functions of script editing, ordering of stories, and timing. The latter system tells the former system which video clips it wants when, and sends the command to roll them. This latter system also feeds scripts to the teleprompter.
A crash of the latter system would cause serious problems. It would deny access to all scripts. It would prevent the teleprompter from operating. It would make it impossible to roll video clips via the normal method. This includes the little banners & intros that I suspect most of us don't notice but that eat up a fair bit of the show. It would deny access to the planned list of stories & their lengths. Trying to operate without it would be pretty chaotic.
On the other hand... at least in our case, scripts are printed before the show, so that the anchors can review them for errors. (but not 40 minutes before the show, so if the system crashed that early they may not have been printed yet) There are alternate methods for rolling video clips, and if worse comes to worse our editors can dump their stories out to tape & bring the tapes down to master control. We'd have to drop a LOT of video (because the alternate methods are a lot slower & the operators couldn't keep up) but we'd sure get a show on the air. Timing on paper would be pretty poor - we might well clip the subsequent program or have to dump out in the middle of a package. It'd be pretty ugly but it would work.
I wonder if...
- There was a meltdown in a basic piece of infrastructure that affected multiple systems? Like the feed to a breaker panel failed? Or an Ethernet router died, breaking the connections between computer systems?
- There were multiple unrelated failures? (Murphy's Law!)
- The failure wasn't in a computer system at all, but in some other piece of technical gear, like maybe the video switcher?
- It was (as suggested by someone else) a human failure rather than a technical one? I.e., a director didn't show up and the non-director who tried to fill in wasn't up to the job?
- WHDH had additional equipment automated beyond what we do. Newer automations are able to control the video switcher and even the audio console - stations that have automated these functions have probably laid off the people who used to do them - if the automation fails there simply isn't anyone there to operate the backup, and since the director can't be in two places at once (s)he can't run the show manually.
I'd imagine there are lessons for a lot of us here, not just for the folks in Boston!