I know the WOAI sidebands were really strong in Dallas, it is a wonder 1190 didn't complain.
1200 and 1190 are both CC stations.
I know the WOAI sidebands were really strong in Dallas, it is a wonder 1190 didn't complain.
stacker said:I know the WOAI sidebands were really strong in Dallas, it is a wonder 1190 didn't complain.
1200 and 1190 are both CC stations.
MarioMania said:I don't get it if WBZ interference is in Pittsburgh at night, Why is no one complaning?
MarioMania said:I don't get it if WBZ interference is in Pittsburgh at night, Why is no one complaning?
That would do it. But if it's voluntary, AND the pure HD method is totally contained within +/-10khz like analog AM is, the overall result may well be less interference to neighboring signals and better coverage for the stations who are in such bad shape that they have little to lose. We have learned from HD television that interference--even minimal interference--is a deal breaker. And with the nature of nighttime AM, I can't see any way that this could ever work to any meaningful degree at night...hybrid or pure HD unless error correction on steroids were to break out from the research labs.Bongwater said:From what I'm hearing, one of the ideas being floated around is to convert the ENTIRE AM band to HD.
Personally, I can't think of a FASTER way to KILL AM radio altogether.
Bongwater said:From what I'm hearing, one of the ideas being floated around is to convert the ENTIRE AM band to HD.
Personally, I can't think of a FASTER way to KILL AM radio altogether.
schmave said:Bongwater said:From what I'm hearing, one of the ideas being floated around is to convert the ENTIRE AM band to HD.
Personally, I can't think of a FASTER way to KILL AM radio altogether.
You know some anti-AMers would love that.But that is one of the worst ideas I've ever heard in anything. So many AM stations here in the Midwest have turned off HD the past several months, and the band sounds better than it has since probably 2005.