• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Where are the rock hits?

Modern English-I Melt With You got little or no CHR airplay when it was a current in 1983. It did get a lot of rock airplay, especially on the Burkhart-Abrams "Superstars" format which was heavily modern rock in that era.

The ironic thing is even if AOR was basically the only format to support the song as a current, few if any classic rock stations have played it over the decades. Instead it has been a Hot AC retro lunch kind of song. For my personal tastes it was amazingly fresh as a current and totally burned now.

Getting back to today ,when I saw the list of rock hits some CHRs are playing my impression is that most are not getting active rock airplay, the songs are too young sounding to be taken serious at rock. If there is a whole genre of "teen rock" (including the emo bands) that gets CHR but limited rock airplay this would be the opposite of the 70s and 80s when most Top 40 rock crossovers got their start at rock radio (and were respected by rock fans). One exception was a band I loved at the time, Sweet, who had a bubblegum rock image, they seemed to get more airplay at Top 40 than rock radio.

Another difference between the 70s and today is that rock music was HUGE back while pop was looked down on by many. Today pop is more popular and get's much more media attention. Pop music is the soundtrack of the popular culture while rock is a smaller segment. The vast majority of Americans would not know a Godsmack song if they heard one even if they have been a rock radio staple for a decade.
 
Charles....I don't think you understand CHR. Your asking me how or why certain songs did or didn't make it. How come this, How come that. I'm explaining and answering your questions. Were talking Top 40 and where is or what is a Rock hit...correct?
Maybe you should explain and start all over again..... What is CHR? Then I'll take it from there.
 
Jay F said:
Modern English-I Melt With You got little or no CHR airplay when it was a current in 1983. It did get a lot of rock airplay, especially on the Burkhart-Abrams "Superstars" format which was heavily modern rock in that era.

I don't agree with you at all. The markets I was in, and the first time I ever heard this song was on a top market CHR. Yes It got more popular as it got older like the Romantics "What I like About You." That didn't chart well when it was released...but the First time I ever heard ...especially when it debuted on the Hot 100 was on KFI- Los Angeles. Then we can go back to the 50's and give you an example like "In the Still Of the Nite" - 5 Satins. As big as the song was...it only peaked at 29. It was played and rotated as a number 1. It was a heavy oldie back in the 70's. It was an airplay hit, and it doesn't mean it has to score well on the charts. Over a period of time , it can sell a million records, not a just a million as a current. It still makes it a hit. Plus it was released again on the chart and re-charted the next 5 years.

The ironic thing is even if AOR was basically the only format to support the song as a current, few if any classic rock stations have played it over the decades. Instead it has been a Hot AC retro lunch kind of song. For my personal tastes it was amazingly fresh as a current and totally burned now.


Getting back to today ,when I saw the list of rock hits some CHRs are playing my impression is that most are not getting active rock airplay, the songs are too young sounding to be taken serious at rock. If there is a whole genre of "teen rock" (including the emo bands) that gets CHR but limited rock airplay this would be the opposite of the 70s and 80s when most Top 40 rock crossovers got their start at rock radio (and were respected by rock fans). One exception was a band I loved at the time, Sweet, who had a bubblegum rock image, they seemed to get more airplay at Top 40 than rock radio.

Tell me what is an EMO band?....I hope it's not a Brian Eno or something. I loved the Sweet...and yes Little Willy, Ballroom Blitz were top 40. Love is Like an Oxygen is a classic rock hit. And it was a CHR/Top 40 hit as well. Andy Priest and Brian Connolly said they would dissolve the band if they had to continue to record songs like Little Willy or Blockbuster again. Even if it cost him their career. That's why their sound changed.

Another difference between the 70s and today is that rock music was HUGE back while pop was looked down on by many. Today pop is more popular and get's much more media attention. Pop music is the soundtrack of the popular culture while rock is a smaller segment. The vast majority of Americans would not know a Godsmack song if they heard one even if they have been a rock radio staple for a decade.

>>>>I agree with you.
 
Starbucks said:
Charles....I don't think you understand CHR. Your asking me how or why certain songs did or didn't make it. How come this, How come that. I'm explaining and answering your questions. Were talking Top 40 and where is or what is a Rock hit...correct?

Nope, wasn't me who started this thread, and it wasn't me who asked where are the Rock hits or how or why certain songs didnt make it.
I did however question the validity of the statement that certain Classic Rock bands were also at one time considered mainstays at CHR.
I will definitely agree with you that back in the day Top 40 radio playlists were less homogenized, and some songs became huge regional hits.
 
The problem with today's rock music is that the Blues have almost completely been stripped out of the sound. This is an unfortunate trend that began with the 'alternative' explosion of the '90s. ALL great rock music is based in the Blues. Consider what is arguably the most popular and best-known rock song of the last decade, 'Seven Nation Army.' There's a song that could have been released in any era - completely unaltered - and been a classic. John Mayer, while generic & boring to the point of tears (IMO), is successful because he does incorporate the Blues and classic rock into his sound. Most of the rock music today is still stuck in the 'post-grunge' era, and that style is completely and utterly played out. Then there's the emo crap, and there's only so much of that whiny garbage that can be played before it gets old even to its target audience. Seriously, why are we still talking about Weezer in the year 2010? There's a reason we still talk about Led Zeppelin or any number of timeless classic rock artists, but Weezer? Green Day (who, admittedly, came a long way from 'Dookie')? Come on, people! Of course, Nickelback and the like disgusted me from day one, so I may not be the most unbiased observer here. Still, I think the general public - that is to say us grown-ups, but also the teeny-boppers to some extent - are underwhelmed with the state of today's rock music, and that's why more & more of us are listening to stuff like Lady Antebellum and the like when we do check out new music. I also believe that many teenagers & twenty-somethings who are listening to rock are not all that into newer stuff. No, they're listening to their parents' Led Zeppelin and Pink Floyd CDs. And with good reason: Those artists made music for the ages, music that transcends all else. Today's artists, with a scant few exceptions, are incapable and/or unwilling of doing that. What we need now is more rock artists who seek a return to Blues-based sounds, who look to Zeppelin, Floyd, as well as Buddy Guy, John Lee Hooker, etc., as inspirations, and at the same time can create songs accessible enough for a general audience. We also need a wholesale purge of the entire post-grunge era. It's over, it's played out, there is nowhere else that style can go. It is literally sucking the life out of so many rock radio stations, it's just that the PDs of these stations are apparently too dense & set in their ways to notice! Nickelback and their ilk are EXACTLY to rock what Poison, Tesla & the like were in the late '80s/early '90s, only without the spandex, makeup, & big hair. When audiences, program directors, and (most importantly) the artists & record labels finally get the hint rock will make a major comeback. Until then, expect us grown-ups to continue getting our new music fix on Country stations, and also expect teenagers to keep on listening to hip-hop (another genre that is completely played out, but I digress) or to their parents' music. Plain and simple, modern rock is just not cool or even that modern these days, and that is truly a crying shame. In any walk of life, sometimes it's necessary to go back to basics in order to move forward. That is what rock desperately needs now more than anything, getting back to the basics.
 
RedWingCJS278 said:
The problem with today's rock music is that the Blues have almost completely been stripped out of the sound. This is an unfortunate trend that began with the 'alternative' explosion of the '90s... There's a reason we still talk about Led Zeppelin or any number of timeless classic rock artists, but Weezer? No, they're listening to their parents' Led Zeppelin and Pink Floyd CDs. And with good reason: Those artists made music for the ages, music that transcends all else. Today's artists, with a scant few exceptions, are incapable and/or unwilling of doing that. What we need now is more rock artists who seek a return to Blues-based sounds, who look to Zeppelin, Floyd...

You brought up some interesting points, but you also mentioned Pink Floyd. Have you ever listened to their first album? Sounds pretty Alternative Rock, if not College Rock. Yes, their later albums were masterpieces, but Floyd or guys like David Bowie influenced all sorts of acts with some of their early stuff.
You also mentioned Weezer whose singer is currently finding success with B.O.B. on the track "Magic". Their biggest 90s hit, "Buddy Holly" was a throwback to older Rock N Roll, although it was a huge hit on commercial Modern Rock radio. They also had a hit a few years ago with the catchy "Beverly Hills". Basically, they're a band that knows how to entertain and doesn't always take themselves too seriously. That was the problem with some of the 70s Rock bands - they took themselves wayyy too seriously so when Punk Rock came along it sounded fresh, youthful, and simple.
I also believe Modern Rock is what SAVED Rock music in the early 90s when younger Hard Rock bands were too caught up in Heavy Metal, Thrash metal, and even Death and Doom Metal. Most of the harder bands just didn't have the same caliber of talent as Metallica or Pantera, or 80s pioneers Iron Maiden and Judas Priest. They just sounded loud.
Meanwhile Modern Rock acts applied some hard Rock techniques, along with 60s and 70s Rock sounds, 80s New Wave, and socially concious lyrics. All the cool stuff was coming from Modern Rock - Nirvana, Beck, Pearl Jam, Ten Thousand Maniacs, Rage Against The Machine, Toad The Wet Sprocket, New Order, Garbage, Blur, Soundgarden, Jesus Jones, Sublime, Red Hot Chilli Peppers, Green Day, Smashing Pumpkins, Radiohead, Collective Soul, Nine Inch Nails, Tori Amos, Faith No More, and others.
 
CHRles said:
You brought up some interesting points, but you also mentioned Pink Floyd. Have you ever listened to their first album? Sounds pretty Alternative Rock, if not College Rock. Yes, their later albums were masterpieces, but Floyd or guys like David Bowie influenced all sorts of acts with some of their early stuff.

Yeah, I'm quite familiar with the Piper at the Gates of Dawn, though it's not my favorite Floyd album, and you're absolutely right that they, David Bowie, T. Rex, & so many others influenced later generations. That record, as weird as it is, is chock-full of vintage Blues riffing from Syd Barrett, while the experimental stuff on college radio today skips the Blues and just delves right into weird.

CHRles said:
You also mentioned Weezer whose singer is currently finding success with B.O.B. on the track "Magic". Their biggest 90s hit, "Buddy Holly" was a throwback to older Rock N Roll, although it was a huge hit on commercial Modern Rock radio. They also had a hit a few years ago with the catchy "Beverly Hills". Basically, they're a band that knows how to entertain and doesn't always take themselves too seriously. That was the problem with some of the 70s Rock bands - they took themselves wayyy too seriously so when Punk Rock came along it sounded fresh, youthful, and simple.

Truthfully, I don't know what B.O.B. is. 'Buddy Holly' was a fun little song back around 1996 or whenever it came out, and is easily their finest hour. Still, I think they helped create a monster where seemingly thousands of copycat bands - self-consciously geeky and goofy - flooded the airwaves. Enough already; maybe getting back to that '70s ethos you referenced where musicians actually took their work seriously would be a good thing. These are very serious times we are living in and one would think that would be reflected in the music we hear. Yet, whenever I turn on a station that plays contemporary music, it's all partying and escapism. I guess that works for some people, but its all gotten very tiring to people like me. Country radio has some exceptions, but even there most of the material is just plain fluff. I guess I just want to hear some substance again. I'm tired of nerds with guitars.

CHRles said:
I also believe Modern Rock is what SAVED Rock music in the early 90s when younger Hard Rock bands were too caught up in Heavy Metal, Thrash metal, and even Death and Doom Metal. Most of the harder bands just didn't have the same caliber of talent as Metallica or Pantera, or 80s pioneers Iron Maiden and Judas Priest. They just sounded loud.
Meanwhile Modern Rock acts applied some hard Rock techniques, along with 60s and 70s Rock sounds, 80s New Wave, and socially concious lyrics. All the cool stuff was coming from Modern Rock - Nirvana, Beck, Pearl Jam, Ten Thousand Maniacs, Rage Against The Machine, Toad The Wet Sprocket, New Order, Garbage, Blur, Soundgarden, Jesus Jones, Sublime, Red Hot Chilli Peppers, Green Day, Smashing Pumpkins, Radiohead, Collective Soul, Nine Inch Nails, Tori Amos, Faith No More, and others.

Yes, that first wave of '90s groups were for real & took their craft seriously, and the hair metal had run its course. That was healthy & good, the purging that took place around 1992, and it hasn't been repeated in quite the same way since. But just as the hair bands bastardized Led Zeppelin, the post-grunge that emerged bastardized Soundgarden &, especially, Alice in Chains (I love Alice in Chains & their recent comeback album is great, but I hate what the bands that have followed in their wake have done.) Today's 'Indie' rock is merely doing the same thing a group like Pavement did back in the day - dull, nerdy music without any style to it. Shoegazers, so to speak. Yawn. Back to post-grunge, about '94, '95, artists like Live, Bush, Candlebox, Creed, et al. came about and just watered down the entire 'alternative' scene. And then more & more bands, to this very day, just kept playing along, not a lick of originality to them. Then, to add insult to injury, in the late '90s Metal of the variety you described above came into fashion. Korn and all that utter crap. Just plain noise, with rapping & hip-hop beats thrown into the mix just to make it even more annoying & dreadful. Thank God that whole thing has largely disappeared. Post-grunge pablum has stuck around, though, and for about 15 years too long. Again, this is not timeless music like the best of what is heard on classic rock. Something has to give, because modern/active/whatever rock radio - & CHR, as well, because the pop stuff is equally redundant - does not have much of a future if the music scene doesn't move forward somehow, and soon. As I said in my prior post, a large-scale return to Blues-based sounds might go a lot way toward sparking a rock revival. I'm not (yet) familiar with all of their music, but there's a group called Wolfmother that has had some buzz the past couple of years, and they are a throwback to the Cream, Hendrix era. Slash recently recorded with the group's lead singer, and the resulting single is one of the best things I've heard on rock radio in years. There are probably more young artists out there doing such a thing than I realize, but are they radio-friendly (in other words, can they write catchy hooks)? 'Seven Nation Army' is the blueprint that should be followed and expanded upon. Do they have big label support (and does that even matter all that much anymore?) If so, then smart and proactive PD's need to respond. That's another angle to all this, that stations of all varieties today play it way too safe most of the time. If a CHR tried out some of Slash's new material, they may discover that their audiences like it and find it a refreshing change. I also propose a permanent retiring of the moniker 'Alternative,' but I digress, this is the CHR board. For the record, I'm in my '30s, so I'm not some middle-aged man or old fogey reminiscing about the good old days here.
 
Admittedly I like Korn but agree with a lot of what you said - some of the Rock music that came out in the second half of the 1990s was watered down, produced by big labels looking to push young acts with the right look and sound. You can't blame CHR or corporate Rock radio for playing along as that's exactly what their audience craves - stuff that is watered down enough for mass consumption. Top 40's job isn't to look outside the box, but rather to know whats hot inside the box, and understand where audience's tastes might be going.
The truth is that audience's tastes change gradually and people can't handle being exposed to too much new material, and especially to forward-thinking stuff...unless they're introduced to it on their time and schedule! We're all individuals so likely we'd want to listen to new stuff when it's convenient for us rather than have it shoved down our throats by someone else. Since that's normally the case, Top 40 radio shouldn't apologize for playing the big hits and plenty of fluff - that's what most of the CHR audience wants to hear when they tune into their local Top 40 station.
 
No, you're absolutely right, CHRles, CHR is for people who just want to hear the hits, and I wasn't trying to argue otherwise. I'm not a huge fan of the format, mind you, so it all sounds redundant to me, but it works. I'm just trying to determine how rock music can get back into that mix. Unfortunately, radio stations cannot force artists to make better music, they have to play with the cards that have been handed to them. Truth is, I really don't blame any CHR for not playing more rock music, because - as already established - 95% of today's rock is garbage, to put it kindly (but that includes the rock that CHR's do play.)
 
It seems to come down to a few simple things:

1. Not enough local PD/MD's...the regional hit has dissappeared for the most part and been replaced by the national add. We all know that certain regions have different tastes. I, honestly, don't think Pitbull is as popular in Boise as Miami or All Time Low is as popular in Mobile as Seattle. Unfortunately, this problem will probably just get worse and niche internet formats will steal away each little demographic.

2. Rock has struggled with finding new, lasting mainstream talent that doesn't go HotAC (Goo Goo Dolls, Matchbox 20, All-American Rejects). I like to see what VH1 is doing...if Black Keys and Mumford & Sons works next to Eminem and Katy Perry for them, why wouldn't it work for us?

3. Rock needs to be promoted more by the labels or promotions to get on more TV commercials & shows. Maybe this isn't an issue, because a lot of great rock-pop is on MTV, VH1, ESPN shows.

4. We need to realize that CHR is Contemporary Hit Radio...not Contemporary Rhythmic Radio. I didn't know it had to have a "beat" to be considered Pop? When did this happen? And I thought everything on commercial radio was considered "pop" and Top 40 stations just took the best of everything? Or at least isn't this the idea? CHR was the local mainstream ipod before the ipod.
 
As one of the sharpest posters on this board, CHRlesnailed it; homogenized playlists.

As Sean Ross has been pointing out for over a decade, both on this website via his indispensable newsletters as well as his decade-plus long stint as Billboard's CHR/Pop columnist (not sure about that), he wrote back in BB in 2003 that all or most of Clear Channel's CHR/Pop stations are patterned after WKFS/Cincinnati, whose template has best been described as fast adds on the rhythmic stuff and slow adds on the rock stuff after WKFS used that strategy to blow away long time Cincinnati CHR/Pop powerhouse WKRQ, aka Q102.

Aside from Green Day, Nickelback & Rob Thomas, the just aren't many rock acts that top 40 radio will even consider; Bon Jovi's 'We Weren't Born To Follow' was ignored by the format, as opposed to his 2000 top ten anthem 'It's My Life', which remains a staple in the libraries at Adult Hits, Hot AC & Adult Top 40 stations everywhere a decade later.
 
BTW there is a 100.3 THE SOUND in Saint Louis as well,, Im assuming that is what I was picking up duing the summer months. Its 100kw at 200 miles, so that makes sense.. I did hear vegas and Phoenix stations this summer at the same time,, but I doubt that will happen ever again.
 
Mid West Clubber said:
BTW there is a 100.3 THE SOUND in Saint Louis as well,, Im assuming that is what I was picking up duing the summer months. Its 100kw at 200 miles, so that makes sense.. I did hear vegas and Phoenix stations this summer at the same time,, but I doubt that will happen ever again.


WSDD is not 100kW. It's 50 on a short stick. HIGHLY doubt, even in the best of conditions, that you could hear it at that distance.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom